Friday, September 18, 2015

Gov. Scott Walker says he knew before CNN Republican debate that narrative 'no matter what' would be that Fiorina had a big night-MediaIte

.
9/17/15, "Scott Walker: Media Would’ve Said Fiorina Won Debate ‘No Matter What’," MediaIte, by Andrew Desiderio

"Wisconsin Gov. and Republican presidential candidate Scott Walker went after the media following CNN’s GOP debate, telling radio host Glenn Beck on Thursday that members of the political press were going to spin the debate as a win for Carly Fiorina “no matter what.”

I think going in, we knew the narrative no matter what was going to happen was that they were going to say Carly had a big night, no matter what, and obviously they said that,” Walker said. “I think the other impression was — the feedback I got from folks, not just the press but from across the country we talked to, was a frustration that there wasn’t more talk...about issues.”

Walker, who once sat high atop the polls in Iowa but whose campaign has since faltered as Donald Trump rose to prominence among conservatives, also criticized CNN for “trying to pit people against each other for ratings, instead of talking about the issues.”

That’s what’s wrong with this campaign, we’re not actually talking about issues, we’re talking about personalities,” Walker said.

Prior to the debate, moderator Jake Tapper stated that his goal was to craft questions that force the candidates to distinguish themselves from one another."...

.............
........................

Added: LA Times reports poor results for Fiorina in latest California poll Aug. 29-Sept. 8, 2015 (Sa-Tu).
............ 

Only 5 points for Fiorina who "spent tens of millions to impress" Californians just 4 years. ago:

.........

9/13/2015, "California Republicans echo U.S. trends, favoring outsiders Donald Trump and Ben Carson," LA Times, Cathleen Decker 
.....................
[approx. 23rd parag.] "The voters' early verdict was perhaps most humbling for Fiorina. Just four years after she spent tens of millions to impress them, fewer than half of California Republicans surveyed would consider voting for her, and 23% said they would never consider it....


  











Added #2: How I got to above crosstabs chart:

1. "New University of Southern California Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences/Los Angeles Times poll," linked in above LA Times article in parag. 11.
2. Scroll to "Key Findings"
3. Click on USC Dornsife/LA Times Crosstabs
4. An Adobe Acrobat window appears

........................................................

9/12/15, "California Presidential Poll," LA Times

.....................

"The USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times poll was conducted Aug. 29-Sept. 8 among a random sample of 1,500 registered California voters, including 422 eligible to participate in the Republican primary, which is open only to registered Republicans, and 819 eligible to participate in the Democratic primary, which is open to registered Democrats and voters who decline to state a party. The margin of error for the Democratic subsample is +/- 3.6 percentage points. The margin of error for the Republican subsample is +/- 5.3 percentage points."

......................

No comments: