6/21/14, US Chamber of Commerce, OpenSecrets.org
Chamber of Commerce has spent $700,000 in past two weeks in Mississippi for Thad Cochran and against Chris McDaniel (scroll down):
===========================
Comment: If the Chamber of Crony Capitalism is this desperate to silence the voices of Mississippi voters, Chris McDaniel must be ten times better than we already thought and Thad Cochran must be ten times worse.
Tom Donahue, C of C pres. |
============================
NY billionaires are even throwing cash at Cochran. They think he'll make them even richer:
6/13/14, "Two New York Billionaires Each Give $250K to Pro-Cochran Super PAC," Roll Call, Kent Cooper.
New York billionaire Mike Bloomberg gave $250,000 to "Mississippi Conservatives" which is a Thad Cochran Super PAC.
=======================
6/13/14, "Gun Grabber Michael Bloomberg Spends $250,000.00 to Get Thad Cochran Re-Elected," Erick Erickson, RedState
"Hey Mississippi. You know Michael Bloomberg right? He’s the guy who wants to take your guns away. He’s the guy who created a non-profit group to agitate against the second amendment. He’s the guy spreading lies about the number of school shootings in the country.
Michael Bloomberg is also the guy who just gave a pro-Thad Cochran Super PAC $250,000.00. Gun grabbing Michael Bloomberg is trying to buy Thad Cochran’s re-election.
Who do you think Thad Cochran will stand with the next six years if he gets re-elected. You people or the man who bought his re-election?
That’s 250,000 reasons to vote for Chris McDaniel."
==========================
==========================
4/21/14, "Can Michael Bloomberg’s Anti-Gun Millions Save the Democratic Senate Majority?" The Blaze, Fred Lucas
"Some Democratic strategists and aides are apparently hoping that former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s plan to spend $50 million on a new gun control group will help the party in the 2014 midterm elections."...
==========================
Mississippi favorite Chris McDaniel holds six point lead over Thad Cochran in June 24 Mississippi GOP Primary Runoff, latest Chism Poll, June 17-18
"We have continued to track the GOP Senate Primary runoff. On June 17th and 18th we surveyed 1192 GOP primary voters statewide. The MOE was +/- 2.85%. Our most recent survey confirms that McDaniel now holds a lead outside the margin of error.
On the following pages are the results of our tracking work. We include weighted top lines as well as tables that show results by age and gender.
Important points to remember:
1. While the surveys are consistent in showing McDaniel’s lead growing among voters from the June 3rd primary, our work does not measure for the potential growth in turnout.
- Cochran’s field efforts in the Delta, DeSoto County, Jackson County and other areas where he underperformed on June 3rd are much more extensive in the runoff.
- The GOP establishment is “all in” with TV ads by Governor Bryant, former Senator Lott, and campaign appearances by Senator John McCain.
- Cochran’s awkward appeal for Democrats to cross over is unlikely to produce huge results but with so few votes separating the candidates, all new votes are valuable.
- A 42 year incumbent GOP senator stumping for Democratic and union votes will certainly anger more conservative Republicans.
- Cochran’s assemblage of plutocrats has not gone unnoticed by the populists among McDaniel’s base.
*Example: At the writing of this memo there is yet another firestorm over a Cochran endorsement ad by NFL great Brett Favre whose brother was serving time for a manslaughter conviction before a pardon by former Governor Haley Barbour.
Other notes:
1. These surveys include only landline phones.
2. These surveys have a three-part screen for participation. We surveyed only phone households with a voter participating in all three of the 2008, 2010 and 2012 GOP primaries. We asked each participant if (s) he voted in the recent GOP Primary. We asked each participant if (s) he planned to vote in the runoff.
3. The sample is 95% Caucasian, 3% African American and 2% other ethnicity. The raw survey data over represents women and older voters.
4. Different assumptions about gender and age mix of the June 23rd
turnout will alter these results. The candidate support totals noted
above are made from a weighted sample that assumes turnout at 53% women;
36% ages 65 and older; ages 18 to 64 at 64%. These are the same
assumptions as in previous surveys.2. These surveys have a three-part screen for participation. We surveyed only phone households with a voter participating in all three of the 2008, 2010 and 2012 GOP primaries. We asked each participant if (s) he voted in the recent GOP Primary. We asked each participant if (s) he planned to vote in the runoff.
3. The sample is 95% Caucasian, 3% African American and 2% other ethnicity. The raw survey data over represents women and older voters.
5. With younger voters, the sample sizes are smaller and the charts show more variation from one wave to the next.
"Why is a Democrat surveying in the GOP Senate Race? This
is the most interesting race in the country and it’s happening in our
back yard. These surveys help us better understand the Mississippi
electorate and that’s helpful in our other work instate.
It’s an internal marketing expense. We’ve budgeted for public
surveys of this type for several years. This one just happens to be in a
very closely watched race.
Are IVR surveys reliable?
We do more of these IVR surveys than any other Democratic firm in
America and are always trying to improve our process. Our track record
is a strong one. But there are certainly some “robopolls” that are
poorly done. Imagine a twelve year old with a chainsaw. He can do a lot
of damage to himself and others if he doesn’t know how to use it.
There’s a mountain of research that confirms that when done the right
way, IVR surveys in the 2008, 2010 and 2012 elections measured up well
against live polls.
What about all the footnotes in your survey reports? We
want to be completely transparent about out methodology. We want
everybody -- from the armchair quarterbacks to the serious analysts --
to have all the info we have in the formation of their opinions. This
is a great country where anyone can be an “expert” in politics. We’re
confident enough in our product that we are willing to listen to
constructive criticism. We get better when other smart people—on the
left and on the right—offer their observations about our work.
What’s the best argument against an IVR Survey?
We cannot legally call mobile phone voters, so a portion of the
electorate — usually younger voters and minorities — are harder to reach
with this instrument.
Then why don’t campaigns always use live surveys?
IVR surveys cost less than half the expense of a live poll. But a
statewide campaign with plenty of money would be foolish not to utilize a
lengthy poll with live operators. We tell our clients that if you can
afford a live pollster, find one you like and listen carefully to their
recommendations.
Are you nervous about your predictions?
We aren’t making predictions. We’re just providing a snap shot of the
electorate on a particular day. Big expensive campaigns like this race
are never static. And we are careful to remind readers about the margin
of error in these surveys.
Does it bother you that both GOP Senate campaigns have questioned your numbers at different stages in this race? No. They
have a job to do in energizing their supporters and appealing to
undecideds. We’d be more concerned if only one campaign was complaining.
What if you are wrong with your assessments? If
we find on Election Day we’ve missed the mark, we look at our
assumptions about turnout and demographics and make sure our scripts
were clear and we weren’t “leading the witness” with our questions. And
we also look at the dynamics of the race to see if there were factors
that just couldn’t be measured in a survey. This humbling experience of
getting it wrong—however rare—helps us improve our tool." via Breitbart and Yall Politics
====================================
==================================
.
==================================
.
Beltway GOP says they're going to "crush" the voice of the people:
“I
think we are going to crush them everywhere,” Sen. Mitch McConnell said.
3/8/14, "Leading Republicans Move to Stamp Out Challenges From Right," NY Times, Carl Hulse
3/8/14, "Leading Republicans Move to Stamp Out Challenges From Right," NY Times, Carl Hulse
"Top congressional Republicans and their allies are
challenging the advocacy groups head on in an aggressive effort to
undermine their credibility. The goal is to deny them any Senate primary
victories, cut into their fund-raising and diminish them as a future
force in Republican politics.
“I
think we are going to crush them everywhere,” Mr. McConnell, the Senate
Republican leader, said in an interview, referring to the network of
activist organizations working against him and two Republican incumbents
in Kansas and Mississippi while engaging in a handful of other
contests. “I don’t think they are going to have a single nominee
anywhere in the country.”"...
.
No comments:
Post a Comment