6/25/14, "Open primaries: Time to close them?" Daily Kos, cjo30080
"You probably know by now that U.S. Senator Thad Cochran surprised State Senator Chris McDaniel in Mississippi’s Republican primary runoff yesterday. You also probably know that McDaniel’s Tea Party supporters are pissed.
Is it fun to watch Republicans fight amongst themselves? Yes it is.
But at the same time, I can empathize with McDaniel supporters.
Here in Georgia, we also have an open primary system where we don’t have to declare a party affiliation when registering to vote, and anybody can vote in either the Democratic or Republican primaries. So I can imagine being just as frustrated if a strong progressive candidate lost a close Democratic primary because the Republican-lite candidate recruited Republicans to swing the election his (or her) way.
Here in Georgia, we also have an open primary system where we don’t have to declare a party affiliation when registering to vote, and anybody can vote in either the Democratic or Republican primaries. So I can imagine being just as frustrated if a strong progressive candidate lost a close Democratic primary because the Republican-lite candidate recruited Republicans to swing the election his (or her) way.
The main arguments that I’ve heard in favor of open primaries are that they increase voter turnout and increase the likelihood of electing more centrist candidates. Clearly, open primaries sometimes succeed in meeting one or both of these objectives. But I don’t agree that these objectives are worth pursuing, at least not via open primaries.
If open primaries do increase the likelihood of electing more centrist candidates, then that can be a double-edged sword. For example, Democrats might be relieved when a less extreme Republican is nominated in a safe red state because of open primaries. But then again, it wouldn’t feel so good if a Republican-lite candidate defeated a strong progressive in a blue state for the same reason.
With regard to increased turnout, if a potential voter isn’t familiar enough with the issues to know the difference between a Republican and Democrat…or…is familiar with the issues, but doesn’t have enough in common to affiliate with either party, then I’d prefer that they stay out of the primaries…even if the result is lower turnout. Encouraging people to help nominate candidates for a party that they don’t participate in or, at least, affiliate with isn’t right.
Let registered party members select their own candidates. Close the primaries."
================================
Added: In 2014 Utah politicians agreed to "open" Republican primaries. Citations below.
=================
Mitt Romney helps Beltway millionaires and billionaires attempt to silence the Silent Majority once and for all:
2/23/14, "Big boost: Mitt Romney backs Count My Vote," Salt Lake Tribune, Robert Gehrke
Romney backed Utah's "Count my Vote" which is open primaries similar to what Mississippi has and which can be gamed by the rich to silence the voice of the ordinary:
Among comments to Salt Lake Trib:
============
"offroad999: Nothing
new here. More big money politicians trying to buy votes and power. If
you value your voice you must go beyond just not signing this petition,
you need to educate friends, neighbors and family members."
"orionspyramid
===================
Utah open primaries were championed by RNC lobbyist types Romney and Leavitt. The lobby class wants to get rid of Sen. Mike Lee and get Bob Bennett back or perhaps get Romney's son Josh in there:
Among comments to Deseret News about Utah open primaries:
.
.
"wjalden, Cottonwood Heights, UT
Sweet - the legislature has given us a primary without a runoff, per Buy Your Vote's demands. A candidate can now win with just 20-30% of the vote, if there are enough people in the race.
Sweet - the legislature has given us a primary without a runoff, per Buy Your Vote's demands. A candidate can now win with just 20-30% of the vote, if there are enough people in the race.
They have given us a system that will destroy More.."
==================
On Mississippi's recent "open primary:"
6/25/14, "Democrats Put Cochran Over the Top," John Fund, NRO
"You have to hand it to the GOP establishment. When their interests are threatened, they pull out all the stops. They demonstrated that in dragging GOP senator Thad Cochran across the finish line in tonight’s runoff in Mississippi....
Thad Cochran’s
allies performed a version of that ploy tonight by openly encouraging
liberal Democrats to vote in the primary. Turnout was up by some 15
percent from the June 3 contest between Cochran and Chris McDaniel. The New York Times
reported that “turnout increased by 92 percent in Jefferson County, the
county where black voters represent the largest share of eligible
voters in the country.”
.
.
Thad Cochran will continue in the Senate
only because the GOP establishment used “walking around” money to drum
up minority liberal voters for Cochran. In Mississippi, despite an
unenforceable law saying that only voters intending to vote Republican
can participate in GOP primaries, there was nothing preventing that kind
of primary manipulation....
Austin Barbour, a relative of former governor Haley Barbour, even went so far as to claim of the Cochran campaign:
Austin Barbour, a relative of former governor Haley Barbour, even went so far as to claim of the Cochran campaign:
“We’ve spent a lot of time bringing a conservative message to black voters, as well as to white voters, the old and young, men and women.” Actually, the message was the antithesis of conservatism — that only an aging 76-year-old incumbent can bring home pork-barrel projects that largely benefit a business elite while the state’s voters are saddled with more federal debt." image via NRO
.
===================
Among comments to John Fund, NRO article about recent Mississippi open primary:
===================
I won't vote for establishment Republicans ever again."
.