.
The US "has sold the Saudis $110bn worth of arms since President Obama assumed office, and recently approved
the sale of $1.15bn more. The US also supplies the Saudis with
necessary intelligence and logistics to prosecute its war."
Oct. 15, 2016, "The US just bombed Yemen, and no one's talking about it," UK Guardian, opinion,
What if the United States went to war and nobody here even noticed?
The question is absurd, isn’t it? And yet, this almost perfectly
describes what actually happened this past week.
While many Americans, myself included, were all hypnotized by the bizarre spectacle of the Republican nominee for president, a US navy destroyer fired a barrage of cruise missiles
at three radar sites controlled by the rebel Houthi movement in Yemen.
This attack marked the first time the US has fought the rebels directly
in Yemen’s devastating civil war.
The cruise missile salvo ramps up the already significant US military
involvement in deeply divided and desperately poor Yemen. While it’s
true that the US has launched drone strikes on al-Qaida targets in Yemen
for years, sometimes killing civilians and even US citizens, this
particular military engagement has the potential to drag the US straight
into a protracted and escalating conflict. And, as everyone knows,
America has an uncanny ability to enter protracted and escalating
military conflicts.
Yet we’ve heard absolutely nothing about this from our presidential candidates.
If we investigated, we would find that the Pentagon justified this
attack as retaliation. Last week, missiles were fired on two separate
occasions at another navy destroyer off of Yemen’s southern coast.
Those
missiles fell harmlessly into the water, but they were enough of a
provocation that the navy responded with its own bombardment.
But we would also find that immediately prior to those incidents, on
Saturday 8 October, a 500lb laser-guided US-made bomb was dropped on a
funeral procession by the US-sponsored Saudi-led coalition fighting the
rebels who, the Saudis say, are backed by Iran. This bomb killed more than 140 people, mostly civilians, and wounded more than 525 people. Human Rights Watch called the incident “an apparent war crime”.
That heinous attack led to a strong rebuke from the US, which has sold the Saudis $110bn worth of arms since President Obama assumed office, and recently approved
the sale of $1.15bn more. The US also supplies the Saudis with
necessary intelligence and logistics to prosecute its war. According to Reuters,
the US government is also deeply concerned that it may be implicated in
future war crimes prosecutions as a result of its support for the
Saudi-led coalition."...
[Ed. note: Who in the US government is "deeply concerned"? The current administration will be out of office in a few months. Unless you mean the permanent, unelected neocon parasites.]
(concerned): "This worry might explain why National Security Council spokesman Ned Price stated
that “in light of this and other recent incidents, we … are prepared to
adjust our support so as to better align [the Saudi-led coalition] with
US principles, values and interests, including achieving an immediate
and durable end to Yemen’s tragic conflict”. Sounds good. Then again,
the US bombed Houthi positions days later.
The situation in Yemen is already catastrophic and largely out of
view. Since the conflict began 18 months ago, more than 6,800 people
have been killed. Both rebels and the regime have committed atrocities,
though most of the dead are civilians and most have been killed by
Saudi-led airstrikes. Almost 14.4 million people are now “food insecure”, according to the UN’s World Food Program, and 2.8 million people have been displaced.
In 2015, there were 101 attacks
on schools and hospitals. After two Doctors Without Borders hospitals
were bombed resulting in 20 deaths – one in Taiz on 2 December 2015 and
the other in Abs on 15 August this year – the humanitarian group was
forced to withdraw from its six hospitals in northern Yemen. And the latest news is a cholera outbreak.
The Trump show has managed to bump all the serious and necessary
policy debates not just off the table but out of the room. Presidential
foreign policy discussions, for example, are now basically limited to
who hates Isis more, who said what 13 years ago, and who believes
Vladimir Putin is in charge of a roomful of hackers.
It’s not enough. All the current polls point to Hillary Clinton
winning the presidential election, and there’s a desperate need for
substantive answers regarding her policies. Will she merely continue
Obama’s Yemen strategy, which has not only failed to end the war but
could also soon escalate it?
The prevailing wisdom among many Democrats
has been to focus first on defeating Donald Trump before moving on to
what’s next, but that’s no longer fair to voters nor, really, to the
people of Yemen. We need to know not only what we’re voting against, but
what we’re voting for. As the last few days have shown, the world
doesn’t stop spinning while the US holds elections."
..................
Monday, October 17, 2016
US has just bombed Yemen and no one is talking about it. Yemen has potential of being yet another protracted US military engagement, ie transfer of US taxpayer dollars to war profiteers. With Hillary's vast track record, who in their right mind would wonder what her 'Yemen strategy' would be?-UK Guardian, 10/15/16
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment