11/5/15, "'It's 'worse than anything we could've imagined': Progressives revolt against Obama's 'job-killing' trade pact and Sanders pledges to do everything he can to defeat it," Daily Mail, by Francesca Chambers, White House Corresp. for DailyMail.com and Reuters
"Progressives are in an uproar over the text of President Barack Obama's trade pact, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which finally became public today. Left-wing
group Democracy for America was among the first of the organizations
traditionally aligned with Obama but enraged over the trade agreement to
proclaim that the 'job-killing TPP is worse than anything we could've
imagined.'
Democratic
presidential candidate Bernie Sanders agreed it was 'even worse than I
thought' and promised to 'do everything I can to defeat the TPP.' The international accord now goes to Congress for consideration.
Unions,
lawmakers
and interest groups questioned the long-awaited text of the landmark
U.S.-backed Pacific trade deal that was released today, setting up
a potentially long and difficult path to ratification by the
United States, the biggest of the 12 partners.
GOP
leaders say they may push the legal limits and wait nearly a year to
bring it up, until after the 2016 elections have passed [meaning it could be passed in the "lame duck" session before the new president takes office].
Arguments over the agreement,
aimed at cutting taxes and tariffs on commerce in 40 percent of
the world's economy, focus on transparency and how
the pact affects workers and businesses.
'It's worse than we thought,' Lori Wallach, director of
Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch, told reporters on a
conference call.
U.S. labor representatives, who had already voiced
opposition to the deal, said the agreement contained weak,
poorly worded or unenforceable provisions.
'There are improvements, but we do not believe those
improvements are significant or meaningful for workers,' Celeste
Drake, trade and globalization policy specialist at the AFL-CIO,
said on the same call.
Democracy
for America Executive Director Charles Chamberlain said the 'agreement
would push down wages, flood our nation with unsafe imported food, raise
the price of life-saving medicine, all the while trading with countries
where gays and single mothers can be stoned to death.'
'That’s
what you get when you negotiate a deal with corporations behind closed
doors and keep the public and the press in the dark until the very last
minute.'
Democratic
Rep. Rosa DeLauro - a staunch opponent of the deal - noted the 'secret
negotiations' in her statement and declared the 'massive deal appears to
be even worse for the American public than we had feared.'
'Its
main problems can be simply stated: it would have us do more business
with several low wage countries that have undemocratic regimes and
rampant human and labor rights abuses, and it would cost Americans their
jobs and reduce wages,' she said.
Sanders
said in a statement posted to his Senate website, 'Outrageously, the
proposed agreement includes violators of international human rights,
like Brunei, where gays and single mothers can be stoned to death and
Malaysia where tens of thousands of immigrant workers in the electronics
industry are working as modern day slaves.'
Obama, who championed the deal, will
have to muster support among moderates in Washington to ensure
ratification.
'The TPP means that America will write the rules of the road
in the 21st century,' Obama said in a post online. 'If we don't
pass this agreement - if America doesn't write those rules -
then countries like China will.'
If ratified, the TPP will be a legacy-defining achievement
for Obama and his administration's pivot to Asia, aimed at
countering China's rising economic and political influence.
China has responded with its own proposed 16-nation
free-trade area, including India, that would be the world's
biggest such bloc, encompassing 3.4 billion people.
The TPP agreement would set common standards on issues
ranging from workers' rights to intellectual property
protection. Details have been under wraps during the more than
five years of negotiations, angering those concerned over its
broad implications.
On
Capitol Hill, where some Republicans and many Democrats have opposed
the deal, reaction was mostly muted. Former U.S. Secretary of State,
Hillary Clinton, the Democratic front runner for president, was mum, as
well.
That
perhaps was because the full text of the pact contains 30 chapters plus
add-on agreements, running into thousands of pages.
House
Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady said in a statement this morning
that he would 'study the agreement carefully, consult with my colleagues
and constituents in the coming months, and give the administration the
opportunity to answer all of our questions and address our concerns
before we vote on it.'
Paul Ryan, the new
Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives, reserved
judgment.
'I don't know the answer to what my position is on a trade
agreement I have not even yet read,' he told reporters. 'But again, I am pleased with the process we have
coming before us.'
The White House formally notified lawmakers this afternoon that the president intends to sign the deal.
It started the
90-day clock before his signature triggers the next step in a
process of seeking final congressional approval.
'It is vital that we use this 90-day review period -
established for the very purpose of evaluating the agreement
before the President signs it - to dig into the details and
engage in a vigorous back-and-forth,' said Representative Sander
Levin, ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee,
whose support will be vital for ratification.
The earliest the TPP could come before Congress is March,
just as the U.S. presidential primary season is heating up,
creating the risk that the deal becomes a campaign issue.
That's
why leadership in the legislative branch wants to wait the full 90
legislative days allotted before a vote is taken, until after the
November 2016 election during the lame duck period between the current
session of Congress and the next one.
The
White House noted today that it would be nearly a year before the
accord undergoes a formal review if leadership on the Hill goes that
route.
'We don't believe it's necessary to wait that long,' White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, whose support will also be
crucial for passage through Congress, said today that it looked forward to
examining the details, while U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman
warned that trying to reopen the complex deal could unravel the
whole package.
There was little immediate reaction from Asia.
Canada's new Liberal government said it would review the
deal, negotiated by the outgoing Conservatives and opposed by
some of the country's dairy farmers and auto workers.
'We are committed to reviewing the agreement...and,
crucially, to giving Canadians a chance to read it and to
respond to it,' said Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland.
If the deal goes into effect, Japan has pledged to ease trade barriers on imported french
fries and butter, which have been in short supply in the Asian
market, while Malaysia will eliminate tariffs on all imported
alcohol for the first time in a trade agreement.
Other firsts cited by the partners - Australia, Brunei,
Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru,
Singapore, the United States and Vietnam - include a prohibition
on subsidies to harmful fisheries [so currently "harmful fisheries" are being subsidized] as well as commitments to
discourage imports of goods produced by forced labor and to
adopt laws on acceptable working conditions.
Malaysia will have to implement reforms to combat human
trafficking, and Vietnam will have to allow independent labor
unions before they can reap benefits of the pact.
But the deal does not include measures demanded by some U.S.
lawmakers to punish currency manipulation with trade sanctions,
disappointing car maker Ford Motor Co, although members
pledged not to deliberately weaken their currencies.
The TPP would be a boon for factory and export economies
such as those of Malaysia and Vietnam.
Anticipated tariff perks
are already luring record foreign investment into Vietnamese
manufacturing, and both countries are expected to see increased
demand for key exports including palm oil, rubber, electronics,
seafood and textiles.
That could put pressure on several of Asia's major
developing economies, including the Philippines and Indonesia,
which have recently expressed interest in signing up to the
pact. Thailand said it was studying
the deal and might consider joining."
..........................
No comments:
Post a Comment