Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Thanks to both political parties, US southern border has been erased, therefore US no longer exists. American people must address this reality by demanding cancellation of 2014 US elections

.
One US Senator speaks on behalf of the former United States. GOP E won't join him because they're thrilled about open borders:

7/29/14, "Jeff Sessions Can't Believe What He Sees," Rush Limbaugh transcript

"Jeff Sessions yesterday afternoon on the floor of the Senate spoke about President Obama and "immigration reform," and we have...sound bites.

SESSIONS: The president is preparing to assume for himself the absolute power to set immigration law in America....The absolute power to determine who may enter and who may work, no matter what the law says, by the millions. Our response now is of great import.  It will define the scope of executive and congressional powers for years to come.

RUSH:  Sessions then said that if Obama is allowed to do this, the moral authority for any border enforcement will forever be eviscerated.

SESSIONS:  If President Obama is not stopped in this action and he exceeds his powers by attempting to execute such a massive amnesty contrary to law, the moral authority for any immigration enforcement henceforth will be eviscerated. Anyone the world over will get the message: "Get into America by any method you can, and you will never have to leave." We're almost there, but it's not too late.

RUSH:  And then he issued a warning...

SESSIONS:  Let me state a warning. The American people are being roused to action -- and once activated, their power will be felt.  They will not be mocked. They have begged and pleaded for our nation's immigration laws to be enforced for 30 or 40 years.  The politicians have refused, refused, refused. There's one thing the powers in Washington fear; that is being voted out of office.  Before a member of Congress acquiesces to any action of this kind, they should consider their responsibility to their constituents.

RUSH:  And then he did something that few in Washington have the courage to do.

SESSIONS:  Mr. President, you work for the American people, they don't work for you, and they will not accept nullification of their law passed by their elected representatives. I'm calling on all members of Congress today to stand up to these lawless actions and sponsor legislation that will block them. I'm calling on every person in this body and in this house and in the House of Representatives to stand and be counted at this perilous hour.

RUSH:  Folks, I have to tell you: It's both appalling and astonishing that it has really come down to this. A United States Senator has to practically beg his fellow congressmen and countrymen to do something to stop these upcoming extra-constitutional executive orders. And he's right. They will effectively overturn what is left of our immigration law.  Now, the Drive-By Media ignored the speech totally. 

They don't want the American public to get riled up and kill amnesty like they've done so many other times in the past. But they're not gonna be able to stop it because Sessions also asked for the phone lines in Washington to be melted. Now, granted, it's near congressional recess time, and they're all gonna be leaving town. But not quite yet. 

The phones in Washington did indeed melt yesterday, despite the fact the Drive-Bys did not cover this. There's so much going on that it's hard for anybody to focus on any one single thing. The chaos, the deterioration, the disasters are numerous.  But here you have a United States senator, the only one standing up in opposition to this -- the erasure of the Southern border, for all intents and purposes. 

When is this gonna stop?  With a stroke of his pen he authorizes five or six million with amnesty.

Meanwhile, the trains keep coming from Central America, and there's no end in sight to that. None!

And nobody's talking about ending it. Some are obsessed with immigration reform, comprehensive or otherwise. But, I mean, it's just astounding. Here's the story on this from the Associated Press:

"Obama Mulls Large-Scale Move on Immigration." He's gonna expand the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals to include adults, which we predicted, by the way....It's been obvious from day one. "You can't have these kids arriving here unaccompanied! Well, you can't have them arriving without their parents! At some point, we're gonna have to track down their parents and bring them here. 

"That's the only humane thing to do. We must unite these children with their parents." So we'll find them and we'll fly them up here. It's a Democrat voter-registration effort. It'll further pressure on the welfare or whatever it is. None of it's any good. I don't care how cloaked in compassion you claim to be. We could be as compassionate as you want, but compassion does not require us to commit suicide as a nation.

How many of you remember that we shut down immigration from 1924 or '25 to 1965?  There was none.  Zip, zero, nada!  Every time I mention that, people are stunned. They think immigration is something that happens all year, every year, throughout the year. From 1925 to 1960, 35 years we suspended legal immigration. You know why?  So that the people who came here post-Civil War up to post-World War I could assimilate and become Americans.

They could learn our holidays, learn English, and become part of the American fabric and culture -- which, by the way, they wanted to do. That's not even a component anymore. Talk about assimilation and you get laughed out of the room. "Who are we to make people want to live like us?" Well, it's our country! 

"Well, what gives us the right to tell people they have to live like we do?" That's the catcall from the left. "These people have their own culture. Why can't they set it up here? Who are we to tell them how?" That's the justification for this, and running throughout all of it is: America has been to blame and must pay the price for all of our aggressive transgressions over all of these decades."

================================


============================

6/2/2007, "Too bad," Wall St. Journal column by Peggy Noonan
 
"What political conservatives and on-the-ground Republicans must understand at this point is that they are not breaking with the White House on immigration. They are not resisting, fighting and thereby setting down a historical marker -- "At this point the break became final." That's not what's happening. What conservatives and Republicans must recognize is that the White House has broken with them. What President Bush is doing, and has been doing for some time, is sundering a great political coalition. This is sad, and it holds implications not only for one political party but for the American future.
The White House doesn't need its traditional supporters anymore, because its problems are way beyond being solved by the base. And the people in the administration don't even much like the base. Desperate straits have left them liberated, and they are acting out their disdain. Leading Democrats often think their base is slightly mad but at least their heart is in the right place. This White House thinks its base is stupid and that its heart is in the wrong place.
For almost three years, arguably longer, conservative Bush supporters have felt like sufferers of battered wife syndrome. You don't like endless gushing spending, the kind that assumes a high and unstoppable affluence will always exist, and the tax receipts will always flow in? Too bad! You don't like expanding governmental authority and power? Too bad. You think the war was wrong or is wrong? Too bad.
But on immigration it has changed from "Too bad" to "You're bad."
The president has taken to suggesting that opponents of his immigration bill are unpatriotic -- they "don't want to do what's right for America." His ally Sen. Lindsey Graham has said, "We're gonna tell the bigots to shut up." On Fox last weekend he vowed to "push back." 
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff suggested opponents would prefer illegal immigrants be killed; Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez said those who oppose the bill want "mass deportation." Former Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson said those who oppose the bill are "anti-immigrant" and suggested they suffer from "rage" and "national chauvinism."
Why would they speak so insultingly, with such hostility, of opponents who are concerned citizens? And often, though not exclusively, concerned conservatives? It is odd, but it is of a piece with, or a variation on, the "Too bad" governing style. And it is one that has, day by day for at least the past three years, been tearing apart the conservative movement.
I suspect the White House and its allies have turned to name calling because they're defensive, and they're defensive because they know they have produced a big and indecipherable mess of a bill -- one that is literally bigger than the Bible, though as someone noted last week, at least we actually had a few years to read the Bible. The White House and its supporters seem to be marshalling not facts but only sentiments, and self-aggrandizing ones at that. They make a call to emotions -- this is, always and on every issue, the administration's default position -- but not, I think, to seriously influence the debate....
If they'd really wanted to help, as opposed to braying about their own wonderfulness, they would have created not one big bill but a series of smaller bills, each of which would do one big clear thing, the first being to close the border. Once that was done -- actually and believably done -- the country could relax in the knowledge that the situation was finally not day by day getting worse. They could feel some confidence. And in that confidence real progress could begin.
The beginning of my own sense of separation from the Bush administration came in January 2005, when the president declared that it is now the policy of the United States to eradicate tyranny in the world, and that the survival of American liberty is dependent on the liberty of every other nation. This was at once so utopian and so aggressive that it shocked me. For others the beginning of distance might have been Katrina and the incompetence it revealed, or the depth of the mishandling and misjudgments of Iraq.
What I came in time to believe is that the great shortcoming of this White House, the great thing it is missing, is simple wisdom. Just wisdom -- a sense that they did not invent history, that this moment is not all there is, that man has lived a long time and there are things that are true of him, that maturity is not the same thing as cowardice, that personal loyalty is not a good enough reason to put anyone in charge of anything, that the way it works in politics is a friend becomes a loyalist becomes a hack, and actually at this point in history we don't need hacks.
One of the things I have come to think the past few years is that the Bushes, father and son, though different in many ways, are great wasters of political inheritance. 
They throw it away as if they'd earned it and could do with it what they liked. Bush senior inherited a vibrant country and a party at peace with itself. He won the leadership of a party that had finally, at great cost, by 1980, fought itself through to unity and come together on shared principles. Mr. Bush won in 1988 by saying he would govern as Reagan had. Yet he did not understand he'd been elected to Reagan's third term. He thought he'd been elected because they liked him. And so he raised taxes, sundered a hard-won coalition, and found himself shocked to lose the presidency, and for eight long and consequential years. He had many virtues, but he wasted his inheritance.
Bush the younger came forward, presented himself as a conservative, garnered all the frustrated hopes of his party, turned them into victory, and not nine months later was handed a historical trauma that left his country rallied around him, lifting him, and his party bonded to him. He was disciplined and often daring, but in time he sundered the party that rallied to him, and broke his coalition into pieces. He threw away his inheritance. I do not understand such squandering.
Now conservatives and Republicans are going to have to win back their party. They are going to have to break from those who have already broken from them. This will require courage, serious thinking and an ability to do what psychologists used to call letting go. This will be painful, but it's time. It's more than time." via bizzyblog

===================================

GOP has merged with Democrats:

2/20/13, As Country Club Republicans Link Up With The Democratic Ruling Class, Millions Of Voters Are Orphaned,” Angelo Codevilla, Forbes
.
“Increasingly the top people in government, corporations, and the media collude and demand submission as did the royal courts of old.”… 

 
==================

Comment: It's fine if Republicans find their ideology compatible with Democrats'. They simply need to file paperwork making their Democrat status official. 


 

 

No comments: