.
10/9/13, "California Makes U.S. Citizenship Obsolete," FrontPage, Arnold Ahlert
"On Saturday, California Gov. Jerry Brown signed the
Trust Act. It prohibits illegal aliens from being turned over to U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) authorities for possible
deportation unless they have been charged with or convicted of a serious
offense. ”While Washington waffles on immigration, California’s forging
ahead,” Brown said. ”I’m not waiting.”
California is indeed forging ahead. Last Thursday, Brown signed a
bill allowing illegal aliens to obtain drivers’ licenses. ”Millions of immigrant families have been looking forward to this day,”
said Democratic Assemblyman Luis Alejo, who sponsored the bill....
Not “immigrant families.” Illegal immigrant families.
Brown was even busier on Saturday. In addition to the Trust Act, he
signed another seven bills aimed at blurring, if not eradicating the
distinction between law-abiding legal immigrants and their illegal
counterparts. The measures included imposing restrictions on those who
charge fees to help illegals gain legal status–and the ability to
criminally charge employers who threaten to report an individual’s
immigration status, if that threat is used to “induce fear.” Given that
it is against the law to hire illegals, Brown and his fellow Democrats
have essentially given illegals the power to threaten their employers.
Even more remarkably, Brown also signed a bill that permits the California Supreme Court to grant law licenses to illegal aliens.
Illegal-alien rights activists were ecstatic. “Today marks the dawn
of a new era in California’s immigrant communities,” said Reshma
Shamasunder, director of the California Immigrant Policy Center. Her
organization declared 2013 the “year of the immigrant” in California.
Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco) who sponsored the Trust Act, rationalized its passage in a September press release. “Federal
officials have held people whose worst alleged violation was selling
tamales without a permit or having a barking dog,” he explained. “Even
crime victims have been deported. We need to end that to bring back
trust between our communities and the local law enforcement agencies
supposed to protect them.”
That press release was a window into the mindset of the activist
American left, for whom the rule of law its little more than an
inconvenient impediment that can be ignored in pursuit of “nobler”
ambitions. It further noted that the Trust Act was crafted to defy a
federal immigration program known as Secure Communities, or S-Comm. The
release bemoaned the fact that more the 50,000 “contributing
Californians” had been deported “though they had not been convicted of
any crime, or only minor crimes.” In other words, being in the country
illegally is completely irrelevant.
For many California jurisdictions, federal immigration law has been
irrelevant for quite some time. Santa Clara, San Francisco and Los
Angeles counties have already embraced the provisions of the Trust Act.
In December 2012, LA County Sheriff Lee Baca announced he
would no longer honor federal immigration law. His actions, along with
those of the aforementioned counties, were based on a legal directive issued the
same month by California Attorney General Kamala Harris. Harris
contended that local law enforcement communities were not obligated to
comply with S-Comm.
ICE released a statement in reaction to Harris’s ruling. ”The federal
government alone sets these priorities and places detainers on
individuals arrested on criminal charges to ensure that dangerous
criminal aliens and other priority individuals are not released from
prisons and jails into our communities,” it said.
The federal government’s priorities are tellingly selective. When the
state of Arizona passed SB 1070, a law that allowed law enforcement
officials to inquire about proof of residence from those detained for
other legitimate reasons, Eric Holder’s Department of Justice (DOJ) sued the state. The DOJ won a partial victory when the Supreme Court ruled that
asking people to produce proof they are in the country legally if they
have been stopped for another legitimate reason is constitutional, but
Justice Anthony Kennedy determined that immigration law per se —
including the decision not to enforce the law — remains exclusively under federal jurisdiction.
The likelihood that the DOJ will file a similar lawsuit against
California for its decision to openly defy federal immigration law?
Zero. ...
”Californians, regardless of their immigration status, are now left
unprotected from deportable criminal aliens, and ICE agents will be
forced into unnecessarily dangerous situations trying to track down
illegal aliens who were already safely in the custody of state and local
law enforcement,” she said.
That’s assuming ICE has the impetus to do so. It is no secret that
the Obama administration has set the standard for selective law
enforcement, highlighted by the president’s unilateral decision to establish the Deferred
Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) by executive order. The DREAM
Act-like program provides de facto amnesty for thousands of illegal
aliens ostensibly younger than 30 who arrived in United States before
age 16, and have lived here for at least five years continuously.
The word “ostensibly” is critical. A Freedom of Information Act
request filed by Judicial Watch procured documents revealing that
comprehensive background checks will be replaced by
“lean and lite” checks aimed at accommodating the flood of amnesty
applications enabled by the president."...
[Ed. note: It's not just the president and California creating a third world toilet out of the US, the GOP has wanted this for a very long time. The Bush crowd wanted it badly. It's why the GOP has merged with the democrat party. They want permanent, dependent voters like the democrats have. They don't want the rest of us. It's just a matter of us dying off now.]
(continuing): "Those documents also reveal that
immediate relatives of DACA applicants could be approved for amnesty, a
concept known as “chain migration.” Chain migration substantially
increases the number of illegal aliens who can sidestep immigration law.
And while the nation remains distracted by the government shutdown
and the debt ceiling, five separate immigration-related bills are
surreptitiously working their way through
the Republican-controlled House, only one of which addresses border
security. Moroever, a consortium of business leaders, including New York
City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, are pressuring House
Republicans from Southern states to enact comprehensive immigration
reform.
Furthermore, the same national park the Obama administration
made off-limts to WWII veterans only a week ago, was opened up for
immigration advocates, who held a rally and concert there yesterday.
One of the historical hallmarks of tyrannical regimes is selective
law enforcement. In California, leftist Gov. Jerry Brown has signed
bills into law that have enshrined selective enforcement with regard to
illegal aliens, violating federal immigration law in the process. His
equally leftist Attorney General Kamala Harris has also decided the
state will do whatever it wishes in terms of complying with federal law.
Both of them do so with the utmost confidence that a compromised DOJ
run by a corrupt Attorney General is more than willing look the other
way. Eric Holder is confident he can look the other way because he has a
“kindred soul” in President Obama, who unilaterally and
unconstitutionally granted de facto amnesty to millions of illegal
aliens, bypassing Congress in the process–even as that same Congress
currently plots behind closed doors to reward millions of law-breakers
in return for cheap votes and cheap labor.
This is where America stands in 2013. If left unchecked, one of the
great ironies of all time may eventually be realized: millions of
illegal aliens who have come to America to escape a Third World ethos,
where the rule of law is supplanted by the rule of man, may discover,
for all intents and purposes, they are right back where they started."
=======================
Thousands from Central America try to get to the US each year through Mexico. Below, an El Salvador jail.
——————————————————–
5/20/11, “Despite danger, Central Americans migrate through Mexico,” CNN, by Catherine E. Shoichet
=========================
5/1/13, “All aboard for the American Dream: Desperate migrants ride the ‘Train of Death’ through Mexico to reach the U.S risking violent attack, rape and kidnap,” UK Daily Mail, ap photo
8/30/13, “Officials: Theft Caused Fatal Mexico Derailment That Killed 11,” AP via Huffington Post
MEXICO CITY: “Officials have determined that the theft of some parts from a southern Mexico train track caused a derailment that killed 11 Central American migrants.
The Communications and Transportation Department said Friday that the theft of a metal bar used to join rails and its screws were
the “decisive cause” behind the accident Sunday in a remote region of
Tabasco state. The rail company’s technicians carried out the
investigation.
The rails were not aligned, causing eight of 12 train cars to leave the tracks and flip over.
Authorities initially said six Honduran migrants died, but rescue crews
found five more victims this week while removing the wrecked railcars.
Thousands of migrants brave brutal conditions each year as they travel atop train cars on their way to the United States.”
=================================
9/18/2002, “U.S. Will Get Power, and Pollution, From Mexico,” NY Times, Tim Weiner
“Mexico’s environmental law enforcement is weaker, its government less transparent,
its desire for foreign capital bottomless. California’s energy demand
is enormous — as big as its citizens’ resistance to huge power plants.”…
=============================
"Beneath the thin veneer of Mexican elites
suing Americans in U.S. courts is one of the most repressive political
systems in the world."
7/2/13, "Liberal Apartheid
," NRO, Victor Davis Hanson.
"The elite mostly lead a reactionary existence of talking one way and living another."
"One
of the strangest things about the modern progression in liberal thought
is its increasing comfort with elitism and high style. Over the last 30
years, the enjoyment of refined tastes, both material and
psychological, has become a hallmark of liberalism — hand in glove with
the art of professional altruism, so necessary to the guilt-free
enjoyment of the good life. Take most any contemporary issue, and the
theme of elite progressivism predominates."...
.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment