Friday, October 18, 2013

Radical left Obama and his GOP Senate partners in 'transformation' will need another so-called 'victory' 3 months from now-NY Times

.
10/17/13, "Obama’s Edge Over G.O.P. Is Still Unclear After Victory in Standoff," NY Times, Peter Baker

"By nearly all accounts, Mr. Obama emerged the winner of the showdown, having stared down attempts to undercut his health care program or force other concessions, but it is not clear what he actually won. Did he change the dynamic of his tumultuous presidency and break the cycle of Washington gridlock, opening the way to more meaningful legislation in months to come? Or did he merely kick the can down the road three months so he and Congress will be in the same place again, repeating a pattern that will define his remaining three years in office?"...(parag. 3), via Free Republic

============================

Comment: NY Times pretends the GOP and democrats are opponents. Everyone knows the GOP is, if anything, more eager to open US borders than democrats are. The GOP effectively joined the democrat party years ago. The GOP/democrat unit considers the Tea Party its only opponent:

10/16/13, "GOP Seeks to Rid Itself of the Tea Party," Rush Limbaugh

"There will be a fast move in Republican circles to push "comprehensive immigration reform," to go all-in now.  I can't tell you what the Republicans think they're gonna achieve, except this: I really do believe that some of this is oriented toward driving the conservatives out of the party.  I really think some of this is oriented toward the Republicans actually seeking to get rid of their conservative base.

Even if it takes 15 years in the wilderness to rebuild a new base of people who don't embarrass them, of people who are of the right temperament.  Maybe that's what they're willing to do.  Maybe they've got commitments from their donors to keep 'em afloat if they just get rid of some of these wacko right-wing extremists. "We'll just go all-in here. We'll try to put together a new base of really responsible moderate, temperate, independent-type American voters.

"We'll go out, we'll expand our demographics, we'll get a lot of Hispanics doing this, by throwing away the Tea Party, and we'll get a lot of women voters coming back. We'll throw away our base, and we'll get the transgender and the lesbian, gay, bisexual groups, we'll go out and get the Indians that are ticked off at the Redskins. We'll get them! We'll come out against that, and pretty soon we're gonna own the country."

That is the way they're thinking, and all they gotta do to bring all that off? All they gotta do is throw away their base. That's Christmas morning for 'em.... Why?  'Cause the Democrats don't like their (the Republicans') base, and it's more important to be liked by the Democrats within the establishment, I guess, than it is to have the current base they've got."...

===========================

Long before the Tea Party existed the Republican Party was broken by Bush #1 and #2. In 2007 Peggy Noonan wrote that conservatives were despised by both Bush administrations. She references Bush #2 plans for open borders and the hate his administration spewed at concerned Americans:

6/1/2007, Too Bad,” Peggy Noonan, Wall St. Journal,President Bush has torn the conservative coalition asunder.”

“What President Bush is doing, and has been doing for some time, is sundering a great political coalition. This is sad, and it holds implications not only for one political party but for the American future....But on immigration it has changed from “Too bad” to “You’re bad.”

The president has taken to suggesting that opponents of his immigration bill are unpatrioticthey “don’t want to do what’s right for America.” His ally Sen. Lindsey Graham has said, “We’re gonna tell the bigots to shut up. On Fox last weekend he vowed to “push back.” Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff suggested opponents would prefer illegal immigrants be killed; Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez said those who oppose the bill want “mass deportation.” Former Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson said those who oppose the bill are “anti-immigrant” and suggested they suffer from “rage” and “national chauvinism.”




Why would they speak so insultingly, with such hostility, of opponents who are concerned citizens? And often, though not exclusively, concerned conservatives? It is odd, but it is of a piece with, or a variation on, the “Too bad” governing style. And it is one that has, day by day for at least the past three years, been tearing apart the conservative movement.

 
I suspect the White House and its allies have turned to name calling because they’re defensive....They make a call to emotionsthis is, always and on every issue, the administration’s default position–but not, I think, to seriously influence the debate….

Now conservatives and Republicans are going to have to win back their party. They are going to have to break from those who have already broken from them. This will require courage, serious thinking and an ability to do what psychologists used to call letting go. This will be painful, but it’s time. 

It’s more than time.”"

===========================

2/20/13, As Country Club Republicans Link Up With The Democratic Ruling Class, Millions Of Voters Are Orphaned,” Angelo Codevilla, Forbes
.

“Increasingly the top people in government, corporations, and the media collude and demand submission as did the royal courts of old.”… 


==========================

 
.

No comments: