.
7/16/13, "Addicted to Hate," Richard Fernandez, Belmont club, PJ Media
"In 2010 Vanity Fair
observed that hatred sells, based on their study of magazine
circulations. After Obama was elected, liberal magazines fell on hard
times.
The year 2009 was a tough one for magazines in general …
The three leading liberal political magazines, however, fared
particularly badly. The Nation’s circulation in 2009 was down 7.4
percent from 2008, Mother Jones was down 6.7 percent, and Harper’s was
down 5 percent.” It concluded that “ideologically driven magazines tend
to thrive on feelings of anger and disenfranchisement, and while
liberals were hardly pleased with Obama’s first year in office, the
disappointment can’t compare to the emotions that Darth Cheney and
Cowboy Bush inspired.
The sad fact is that hatred is often a powerful motivator than love.
There is something particularly cathartic about intense hatred. George
Orwell, who was a keen student of totalitarian techniques observed that
hate campaigns had the same effect as a drug. They swept you up and
induced a kind of altered state. Then the crowd, with their veins pumped
full of emotional chemicals, would be subtly directed towards the
object of destruction.
"The horrible thing about the Two Minutes Hate was not
that one was obliged to act a part, but, on the contrary, that it was
impossible to avoid joining in. Within thirty seconds any pretense was
always unnecessary. A hideous ecstasy of fear and vindictiveness, a
desire to kill, to torture, to smash faces in with a sledge-hammer,
seemed to flow through the whole group of people like an electric
current, turning one even against one’s will into a grimacing, screaming
lunatic. And yet the rage that one felt was an abstract, undirected
emotion which could be switched from one object to another like the
flame of a blowlamp. …
The Hate rose to its climax. The voice of Goldstein had become an
actual sheep’s bleat, and for an instant the face changed into that of a
sheep. Then the sheep-face melted into the figure of a Eurasian soldier
who seemed to be advancing, huge and terrible, his sub-machine gun
roaring, and seeming to spring out of the surface of the screen, so that
some of the people in the front row actually flinched backwards in
their seats. But in the same moment, drawing a deep sigh of relief from
everybody, the hostile figure melted into the face of Big Brother,
black-haired, black-moustachio’d, full of power and mysterious calm, and
so vast that it almost filled up the screen. Nobody heard what Big
Brother was saying. It was merely a few words of encouragement, the sort
of words that are uttered in the din of battle, not distinguishable
individually but restoring confidence by the fact of being spoken. Then
the face of Big Brother faded away again, and instead the three slogans
of the Party stood out in bold capitals:
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH...
This is classic Pavlovian conditioning.
Demagogues figured out that if you treated people like dogs they
behaved exactly like them. In the mid-20th century there was much
interest in its use as a means of controlling the “masses of people”.
They were taught what to like, and most especially they were taught what
to hate. And boy did it work. For much of the middle of last century
these techniques of conditioning convinced millions to kill millions.
"In the 1932 novel Brave New World, written by Aldous
Huxley, conditioning plays a key role in the maintenance of social
peace, especially in maintaining the caste system upon which society is
based. Children are conditioned, both in their sleep and in their daily
activities, to be happy in their Government-assigned social role as
Alphas, Betas, etc., as well as in adopting other “socially acceptable”
types of behaviour, including consuming manufactured goods and
transport, practicing free sex, etc….
Another example is in the dystopian novel, A Clockwork
Orange in which the novel’s anti-hero and protagonist, Alex, undergoes a
procedure called the Ludovico technique, where he is fed a solution to
cause severe nausea and then forced to watch violent acts. This renders
him unable to perform any violent acts without inducing similar nausea.
Unintentionally, he also forms an aversion to classical music.
In the science-fiction book Ender’s Shadow, “Pavlovian mental bans”
are also used to prevent crime. In the book, a controversial scientist,
Anton, is kept from researching genetic experimentation by associating
his work with anxiety. A device is then surgically placed in his head
that would increase detected anxiety, sending him into a panic attack.
The result is that Anton must remain good humored at all times, can only
speak of his work through self-deceptive metaphors, and even after his
Pavlovian mental ban is lifted can no longer study science."
The denizens of the 21st century, educated liberals in especial,
think they are above hate. They are too smart for that sort of s**t.
Today we have codes against “hate speech”, social taboos against
“hateful behavior”. But a moment’s study will readily show that much of
this is just sugar coating, that inside the “anti-hate” paintjob lurk
actual hate campaigns themselves. Hate is today’s equivalent of
Victorian sex. Everyone affects to know nothing of it, yet the body
politic would grid to a halt, not to mention go broke, without it.
The link between the Orwell’s theory of conditioning and campaign politics is not hypothetical. During the 2008 campaign Phil de Vellis consciously used the technique to create the famous Hillary 1984 ad
to make the specific point “that Obama represents a new kind of
politics, and that Senator Clinton’s ‘conversation’ is disingenuous. And
the underlying point was that the old political machine no longer holds
all the power. Let me be clear: I am a proud Democrat, and I always
have been. I support Senator Obama. I hope he wins the primary.” Those
are de Vellis’ exact words.
Obama did win the primary. And the question that one naturally asks
is whether having won the Presidency he has put away the Orwellian
techniques in favor of more statesmanlike activity, or whether fear,
hatred and anxiety are still a staple of modern political motivation.
Well we know that 2008 campaign was in part consciously modeled on 1984.
Could we be as dumb as the sheeple in the ad? For some the answer is,
heck yeah." via Lucianne
.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment