3/6/13, "IPCC Invites In the Activists," NoFrakkingConsensus, Donna LaFramboise
"It’s official. The Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) is cognitively impaired. It is wholly incapable
of learning from its mistakes.
Three days ago that institute posted an announcement on its website calling for “expert reviewers” to provide feedback to Working Group 3′s draft report. The first paragraph of that announcement includes the following:
The scientists who are organizing this process ask for voluntary contributions from experts across all sectors, from scholars to business people or NGO representatives. [bold added]Here we go again. The World Wildlife Fund is an NGO. Greenpeace is an NGO. The people who work for those organizations are not scientific experts. They are advocates, activists, and partisans. They have an agenda. They are paid a salary to advance that agenda.
The public is repeatedly assured that the IPCC is an objective and rigorous scientific body, composed of the world’s top scientists. The public is told it can trust IPCC reports because thousands of “scientific expert reviewers” participate in the IPCC process."...
=====================
From Potsdam site:
"IPCC calls for expert reviewers," Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
"03/04/2013 - In the run-up to the publication of its fifth assessment report which will present the state of climate science next year, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) calls for expert reviewers to provide comments on the second order draft of the working group III contribution, which covers the mitigation of climate change. The scientists who are organizing this process ask for voluntary contributions from experts across all sectors, from scholars to business people or NGO representatives.
.
“This is an extraordinarily open consultation process,” says Ottmar
Edenhofer, Co-Chair of the IPCC’s WG III and chief-economist of the
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. “The IPCC process is a
unique example how science actively seeks the exchange with experts
worldwide, striving for a truly comprehensive – and comprehensible –
analysis.” The review of the second order draft is an important step
towards this end."...
====================
.
.
In an 11/14/10 interview the IPCC's same Ottmar Edenhofer freely admits 'climate' policy really isn't about the environment but about "redistribution of the world's wealth" to be taken from developed countries who have "expropriated the atmosphere:"
.
.
11/18/10, "UN IPCC Official Admits 'We Redistribute World's Wealth By Climate Policy'," NewsBusters
.
.
parag. 6, "EDENHOFER): Basically it's a big mistake to discuss climate policy separately from the major themes of globalization. The climate summit in Cancun at the end of the month is not a climate conference, but one of the largest economic conferences since the Second World War....
First of all, developed countries have basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world community. But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy....
One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole."...
(NewsBusters): "For the record, Edenhofer was co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, and was a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report released in 2007 which controversially concluded, "Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations."
As such, this man is a huge player in advancing this theory, and he has now made it quite clear - as folks on the realist side of this debate have been saying for years - that this is
First of all, developed countries have basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world community. But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy....
One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole."...
(NewsBusters): "For the record, Edenhofer was co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, and was a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report released in 2007 which controversially concluded, "Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations."
As such, this man is a huge player in advancing this theory, and he has now made it quite clear - as folks on the realist side of this debate have been saying for years - that this is
actually an international economic scheme designed to redistribute wealth."...
.
.
=============
.
.
Edenhofer says Africa will get "so much money" it might not be able to handle it all:
.
.
(parag. 4), "And it will raise the question if these countries can deal responsibly with so much money at all."
.
.
===============
Edenhofer source interview:
.
.
NZZ am Sonntag
.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment