In response to historic Senate rule change House could start defunding the Senate. Wait, that would mean the US actually has two functioning political parties, so forget it. GOP is already planning its next move to sell out the American people. Free Republic thread

.
11/23/13, "How to retaliate vs Senate rule changes," Free Republic poster Usagi yo

"There are a few Rules the House can change in retaliation for the questionable Senate rule change.

1. No more reconciliation committees. 2. Blue slip any legislation stripped and packed by the Senate under origination theory. 3. Cut Senate and House budget allowances for travel. 4. Basically start defunding the Senate.

Anybody else?"

--------------------------------------

Free Republic thread on what the House can do in response to historic Senate rules change:

=========================

Most were like this:

"All suggestions are well and good, however, getting Weeper Bonehead to any or all will be next to impossible."

Jane Long 2:48:26pm

============================

The Senate filibuster was long targeted by greens and other left groups, NEA, SEIU, Greenpeace, Sierra Club, NWF, NAACP,  CWA, CAP. Now will focus to get all states to enact "same day voter registration:"

1/9/13, "Revealed: The Massive New Liberal Plan to Remake American Politics," Mother Jones, Andy Kroll

"A month after President Barack Obama won reelection, top brass from three dozen of the most powerful groups in liberal politics met at the headquarters of the National Education Association (NEA), a few blocks north of the White House.

Brought together by the

Sierra Club,
Greenpeace,
Communication Workers of America (CWA), and the 
NAACP, 

the meeting was invite-only and off-the-record. Despite all the Democratic wins in November, a sense of outrage filled the room as labor officials, environmentalists, civil rights activists, immigration reformers, and a panoply of other progressive leaders discussed the challenges facing the left and what to do to beat back the deep-pocketed conservative movement."...

[Ed. note: Where is this "deep-pocketed conservative movement"? It doesn't exist.]

(continuing): "At the end of the day, many of the attendees closed with a pledge of money and staff resources to build a national, coordinated campaign around three goals: getting big money out of politics,

expanding the voting rolls while fighting voter ID laws, and

rewriting Senate rules to curb the use of the filibuster to block legislation.

The groups in attendance pledged a total of millions of dollars and dozens of organizers to form a united front on these issues—potentially, a coalition of a kind rarely seen in liberal politics, where squabbling is common and a stay-in-your-lane attitude often prevails. "It was so exciting," says Michael Brune, the Sierra Club's executive director. "We weren't just wringing our hands about the Koch brothers. We were saying, 'I'll put in this amount of dollars and this many organizers.'"

The liberal activists have dubbed this effort the Democracy Initiative. The campaign, Brune says, has since been attracting other members—and also interest from foundations looking to give money—because many groups on the left believe they can't accomplish their own goals without winning reforms on the Initiative's three issues. "This isn't an optional activity for us," Brune tells me. "It is mission critical."...

The Democracy Initiative may be the first time so many groups teamed up to work on multiple issues not tied to an election. "This is really the first time that a broad spectrum of groups have come together around a big agenda that impacts the state and national level," says Kim Anderson, who runs the NEA's center for advocacy and outreach and attended the December meeting.

The Democracy Initiative grew out of conversations in recent years among Radford, Brune, CWA president Larry Cohen, and NAACP president Ben Jealous....Brune says the four men bemoaned how the dysfunctional political process was making it impossible for their groups to achieve their goals....

Greenpeace's Phil Radford notes that for decades conservatives have aimed to shrink local, state, and federal governments by reforming the rules so they could install like-minded politicians, bureaucrats, and judges. Radford calls it "a 40-plus-year strategy by the Scaifes, Exxons, Coors, and Kochs of the world…to take over the country."

So last spring Brune, Cohen, Jealous, and Radford called up their friends on the left and, in June, convened the Democracy Initiative's first meeting. A handful of groups attended, and they began to focus on the triad of money in politics, voting rights, and dysfunction in the Senate....

Other attendees at the December meeting included top officials from the  

League of Conservation Voters,  
Friends of the Earth, Public Campaign, the
AFL-CIO, 
SEIU, 
Common Cause, 
Voto Latino,
the Demos think tank, Piper Fund,  
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, [CREW], People for the American Way,  
National People's Action,
National Wildlife Federation, the  
Center for American Progress, the  
United Auto Workers, and  
Color of Change. (A non-editorial employee of Mother Jones also attended.)

According to a schedule of the meeting, the attendees focused on opportunities for 2013. On money in politics, Nick Nyhart of Public Campaign, a pro-campaign-finance-reform advocacy group, singled out

Kentucky, New York, and North Carolina as potential targets for campaign finance fights. 

In a recent interview, Nyhart said the Kentucky battle would likely involve trying to oust Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Public Enemy No. 1 for campaign finance reform, who faces reelection in 2014.

In New York, Nyhart said, activists are pressuring state lawmakers, including Gov. Andrew Cuomo, to pass a statewide public financing bill in 2013.

And in North Carolina, the fight is more about countering the influence of a single powerful donor, 

the conservative millionaire Art Pope, whose largesse helped install a Republican governor and turn the state legislature entirely red. 

On voting rights, a presentation by a Brennan Center for Justice staffer identified 

California, Colorado, Connecticut, Maryland, and Minnesota as states where efforts to modernize the voter registration system and implement same-day registration could succeed.

But the most pressing issue right now for Democracy Initiative members is Senate rules reform. At the December meeting, attendees heard from Sens. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) and Tom Udall (D-N.M.) on rule changes to curb the spiraling use of filibusters to block legislation. The use of the filibuster has exploded in recent years, 

and Republicans now block up-or-down votes on nearly everything in the Senate,

requiring Democrats to muster 60 votes to conduct even the most routine business.

Liberal groups in the Democracy Initiative want to fix that, and they used the December meeting to plan a coordinated push to urge Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to rewrite the rules. Democrats have until January 22, 

when the window closes on easy rules changes, to get the reforms they want."...



.