.
Bill Clinton lost the nuclear codes and never told anyone-The Atlantic, 2010
Oct. 22, 2010, "Why Clinton's Losing the Nuclear Biscuit Was Really, Really Bad," The Atlantic, Marc Ambinder
.......
"Former President Clinton's
office declined to comment today on reports that he managed to lose the
personal identification code needed to confirm nuclear launches and
never told anyone about it. Gen. Hugh Shelton, chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff during the last few years of Clinton's term,
writes about the episode in his new autobiography. Shelton is especially
sensitive to the proper authentication procedures, having served as
deputy commander of the National Military Command Center (NMCC), through
which all nuclear launch progression action chains are processed. The
National Command Authority (NCA), as the process and the person of the
commander in chief is called, passes from the President to the Vice
President to the Secretary of Defense. (In the absence of the SecDef,
the Deputy Secretary of Defense can stand in.)
........
In
effect, without Clinton's "biscuit," as the personal identifier is
called, the President would not have been able to initiate a launch
order or confirm a launch order executed by someone else. The football
itself, which contains code authenticators, a transceiver, targeting
menus, and continuity of government options, was always with the
military aide."...
............
9/4/16, "Clinton's classified email errors due to 'improper labeling:' Kaine," Reuters, Alana Wise
"Democratic vice
presidential candidate Tim Kaine on Sunday defended Hillary Clinton against criticism over her handling of classified information as
secretary of state, saying she was unaware of the sensitivity of some
information she exchanged over email because it had been "improperly
labeled."
In July, the
Federal Bureau of Investigation rebuked Clinton, the Democratic
presidential nominee, for her use of a private email server during her
tenure as secretary of state from 2009 to 2013, saying she was
"extremely careless" in her handling of classified information.
According
to records released by the FBI on Friday, Clinton told the bureau's
investigators in a July interview that she could not recall getting any
briefings on how to handle classified information or comply with laws
governing the preservation of federal records.
Kaine,
a U.S. senator from Virginia who sits on the Senate Foreign Relations
and Armed Services committees, told ABC's program "This Week," that the
volume of information received by government officials often makes it
difficult to know what information has been declared classified.
"There
were emails that contained classified information that had been
improperly marked. So when she received the email, the material that was
classified - which is supposed to be flagged and identified as
classified - in many instances was improperly labeled," Kaine said.
"We
look at so much material, unless it is specifically pulled out and
identified, it is difficult to know sometimes whether a statement or a
paragraph is classified or not," he added....
She (Hillary) repeatedly said she did not use it to
send or receive classified information. The government forbids handling
such information outside secure channels.
Contradicting
Clinton's comment that she never exchanged classified information over
her private email server, the FBI said that at least 81 email threads
contained information that was classified at the time, although the
agency said the final number may be more than 2,000. While the FBI has
scolded Clinton over the handling of classified information, the agency
recommended that no criminal charges be filed against her.
Clinton
has said that in hindsight she regretted using a private email system
while secretary of state. Opinion polls show that voter concerns about
Clinton's honesty and trustworthiness are among her biggest
vulnerabilities.
A series of
surveys show the race has tightened over the past few weeks. In a
Reuters/Ipsos poll taken during the week of Aug. 26 to Sept. 1, Trump
had the support of 40 percent of likely voters while Clinton had the
backing of 39 percent. Clinton's support has dropped steadily in the
weekly tracking poll since Aug. 25, eliminating what had been a
eight-point lead for her."
.......................
Bill Clinton lost the nuclear codes and never told anyone, former Clinton official writes in autobiography:
.......
2010 article:
.......
Oct. 22, 2010, "Why Clinton's Losing the Nuclear Biscuit Was Really, Really Bad," The Atlantic, Marc Ambinder
.......
"Former President Clinton's
office declined to comment today on reports that he managed to lose the
personal identification code needed to confirm nuclear launches and
never told anyone about it. Gen. Hugh Shelton, chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff during the last few years of Clinton's term,
writes about the episode in his new autobiography. Shelton is especially
sensitive to the proper authentication procedures, having served as
deputy commander of the National Military Command Center (NMCC), through
which all nuclear launch progression action chains are processed. The
National Command Authority (NCA), as the process and the person of the
commander in chief is called, passes from the President to the Vice
President to the Secretary of Defense. (In the absence of the SecDef,
the Deputy Secretary of Defense can stand in.)
........
In
effect, without Clinton's "biscuit," as the personal identifier is
called, the President would not have been able to initiate a launch
order or confirm a launch order executed by someone else. The football
itself, which contains code authenticators, a transceiver, targeting
menus, and continuity of government options, was always with the
military aide.
A former military officer with knowledge of NCA procedures helps fill in some of the details.
Let's
say that the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) detects
an inbound air warning; the NMCC immediately calls the Sit Room or the
military aide, which plugs in the President, who then provides an
alpha-numeric code to verify his identity. Once verified, the President
can (to invoke ICBM language) execute or terminate sorties. The military
aide--known as the Milaide--goes everywhere with the President. Even
when the President travels in a hotel elevator, the Milaide (and the
president's doctor) accompany him. (Yes, every POTUS elevator trip is
monitored.)
So what happens if the President doesn't have his identifier?
The commander in chief of NORAD resorts to the next person the NCA list, the Vice President.
This
is a survival mechanism built in during the Cold War, in the event that
Washington was decapitated without warning in a nuclear strike. NORAD
continues down the list until it finds a capital P-Principle, who
provides that identifier and assumes the duties of the Commander in
Chief.
Sounds like no big deal, right?
Here's the
reality: Losing that identifier card had the potential to create a vast
disruption in nuclear command and control procedures.
So Al Gore
gets "the call" because Clinton can't properly ID himself. Gore is
confused, lives in Washington, knows the President is fine. He tells
NORAD to hold while he tracks down the President, who can't verify his
own identify anyway. Precious minutes (and I do mean precious, seconds
count in the nuke business) are lost while civilian and military
leadership sort things out.
And that says nothing of the fact
that the President would be in gross violation of his duties by allowing
the VP to execute an order that is lawfully the President's to make.
Once a strike is authorized by the NCA, the Chairman and Vice Chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff pass the order to the U.S. Strategic
Command through the NMCC, or through an alternate command site, like
Site R in Liberty Township, PA, or through an airborne platform known as
TACAMO, which stands for "Take Charge and Move Out."
TACAMO's
fleet, operated by the Navy, consists of tricked-out Boeing E6-B
aircraft pre-positioned at six locations across the country. They're on
constant stand-by, ready to fly within 10 minutes of an alert. During
the Cold War, the code name for these missions was "Looking Glass," and
at least one airplane was in the air at all times. TACAMO planes are in
24/7 contact with America's fixed ballistic missile silos, its nuclear
subs, and its nuclear-weapon-equipped airplanes.
Don't confuse
these aircraft with the NAOC, or "Kneecap," four Air Force planes
designed to physically transport the NCA -- POTUS or whomever -- to
safety in an emergency. Wherever the President travels, a Boeing E4 is
not far behind. The planes also ferry other members of the NCA,
including SecDef, to international locations where they know they can
secure their communications if they need them.
If there's a
catastrophic attack on the seat of the United States government, the
planes, their crews, and special mission units are responsible for
ensuring that the surviving constitutional officer "becomes" the NCA
until the emergency is over. The NAOC planes keep in constant contact
with the NMCC, the White House's Presidential Emergency Operations
Center, the HMX-1 squadron that the President uses for helicopter
traffic, and various classified alternate command and control centers
worldwide. (Yes, worldwide.)
On 9/11, according to Shelton, a
NAOC plane was in the air, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz
was evacuated to Site R, and various other continuity of government
measures were put into effect in case they were needed. That day, they
were not.
But the emergency would convince the Bush
administration to significantly retool and expand the secret programs
designed to ensure constitutional government."
.............
Monday, September 5, 2016
Hillary improperly labeled at least 81 and likely over 2000 communications of national security data and said she couldn't recall getting briefed on how to handle classified data-Reuters. Bill Clinton lost the nuclear codes. Both he and his wife have proved overwhelmingly that they're a danger to this country and can't be trusted in public office. Why does the media demand they be returned to the White House for a total of 16 years? Absolutely nothing can convince the media to be on the side of the American people
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment