.
Massive trade deals like pending TPP result "in constant downward pressure on American
wages."...
Oct. 2015 UK Guardian article:
10/9/2015, "Wikileaks release of TPP deal text stokes 'freedom of expression' fears," UK Guardian, Sam Thielman in NY
"Intellectual property rights chapter appears to give Trans-Pacific
Partnership countries greater power to stop information from going
public"
"Michael Wessel was one of the advisers who was asked by the US
government to review what he said were woefully inadequate portions of
the document. Wessel said the thrust of the TPP does nothing for
Americans. “This is about increasing the ability of global corporations
to source wherever they can at the lowest cost,” he said.
“It is not about enhancing or promoting production in the United
States,” Wessel said. “We aren’t enforcing today’s trade agreements
adequately. Look at China and Korea. Now we’re not only expanding trade
to a far larger set of countries under a new set of rules that have yet
to be tested but we’re preparing to expand that to many more countries.
It would be easier to accept if we were enforcing today’s rules.”
Wessel said that ultimately, the countries currently benefiting from
increased outsourcing of jobs by American firms aren’t likely to see
wages rise above a certain level. “If you look in other countries,
Mexico and India and others – there’s been a rise in the middle class
but there’s been stagnation for those we’re hoping to get into the
middle class,” Wessel said. “Companies are scouring the globe for
countries they can get to produce most cheaply.”
That, he said, results in constant downward pressure on American
wages. “Companies are not invested here the way we’d like them to;
they’re doing stock buybacks and higher dividends,” Wessel continued.
“They may yield support for the stock-holding class but it’s not
creating jobs.”...
“The text of the TPP’s intellectual property chapter confirms advocates
warnings that this deal poses a grave threat to global freedom of
expression and basic access to things like medicine and information,”
said Evan Greer, campaign director of internet activist group Fight for
the Future. “But the sad part is that no one should be surprised by
this. It should have been obvious to anyone observing the process, where
appointed government bureaucrats and monopolistic companies were given
more access to the text than elected officials and journalists, that
this would be the result.”"...
..................
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment