.
5/13/13, "The 2010 Election and Citizens United Shook Democrats to the Core," Rush Limbaugh transcript
"You know, folks, on this IRS business, I think the 2010 midterms really
shocked the Democrats. I think they might have expected to maybe lose
some seats, although, actually, my memory -- no, no, no, no, no, my
memory is that they thought with the overwhelming popularity of Obama it
might be the first time that a sitting president's party increased
seats. Well, it wouldn't be the first time....But
they were clearly hoping for at least a draw. In the 2010 midterms they
got shellacked. ...
This IRS targeting of Tea Party groups predated the midterms, but I
think the midterms really intensified it....
And you remember how a bunch of conservative groups were mocked as
paranoid by the media and the administration for claiming this was going
on at the time? I had all kinds of things flowing back to me from my
memory when this story broke.
A Republican congressmen even wrote to the head of the IRS tax exempt
organization division, Lois Lerner, to raise questions about this. But
no one in the media ever bothered to investigate any of it. Think
about how this kind of news and Benghazi could have changed the
elections just last November. Just like the full disclosure of Benghazi
might have changed the elections. But in both cases the one-party
media didn't want to investigate anything that might hurt Obama's
reelection. ...
CALLER: You know, I think this is a very
important issue. This isn't the first time that the Obama administration
has abused the IRS' powers. In 2010, at the same time they were going
after the Tea Party, Austan Goolsbee -- the chairman of the president's
council of economic advisers -- was using the IRS to go after the Koch
brothers, probably somebody that they hated as much as the Tea Party.
There was a press briefing where Goolsbee told the press how much money
the Koch brothers have been paying in taxes. You know, at first they
said that the information was "publicly available," and when that turned
out not to be the case, the administration said, "Well, you know, he
simply accidentally guessed the exact amount that they pay."
RUSH: You know, that's exactly right. I'd forgotten that, but you're
exactly right. Austan Goolsbee did tell the press how little the Koch
brothers were paying in taxes -- in his perspective, how little -- and
there was no way he coulda known that.
CALLER: Right.
RUSH: Unless somebody at the IRS had shared the data with him....
RUSH: Do you remember when the Citizens United case was handed down by the
Supreme Court...It upset them so much that Obama called out the Supreme
Court while justices were sitting in the front row at one of his State
of the Union addresses. He challenged them on that ruling. He told them
they were wrong. Remember Samuel Alito sitting there shaking his head,
"No, no, no," because Obama was totally mischaracterizing the decision?...That may have been the thing at the time that angered them and
frightened them the most, and so that decision could also have a heck of
a lot to do with the IRS....
Remember when Harry Reid said, "Mitt Romney hasn't paid taxes."
"How do you know?"
"Well, good friends have told me."
"Who?"
"I'm not gonna tell you who's told me." But it is clear, Austan
Goolsbee demonstrates, you could pick up the phone, call the IRS, and
they'd tell you what you wanted to know. Somebody at the IRS, it had to
be the IRS, told Goolsbee about the Kochs' tax returns. How did Harry
Reid find out about Mitt Romney's taxes? And we know that all of these
Romney donors were targeted for audits by the IRS. We know that
what's-her-face, Janet Napolitano, in a memo to the Department of
Homeland Security, warned law enforcement officials to be on the lookout
for right-wing extremist grouped who were concerned about illegal
immigration, abortion, increasing federal power and restrictions on
firearms.
Folks, the fact of the matter is, this administration has targeted
right-wing groups from practically every bureaucracy in the government....Clinton did it. Clinton had targeted audits of conservative groups. It
isn't anything new. But for some reason the media has joined the
chorus of criticism on this one. And I'm convinced it's because they
have to save the IRS, and so it's a little bit of damage control, among
other things. ...
Under Clinton the IRS went after the NRA, the Heritage Foundation, the
National Review, the American Spectator, Freedom Alliance, American
Policy Center, Citizens for Honest Government, the Progress and Freedom
Foundation, Concerned Women for America, and on and on and on. But just
remember, folks, what Elijah Cummings said during the whistleblower
hearings on Benghazi. There is death in life, and that's all you need
to know about Benghazi."...
5/13/13, "The IRS Merely Followed Through on Policies the Constitution Constrains Obama from Implementing Himself," Rush Limbaugh transcript
"In fact, the New York Times knew about what the IRS was doing back in
March of 2012, over a year ago. The New York Times knew about this, and
guess what? They were applauding it. There's an editorial in the New
York Times, "The IRS Does Its Job." March 7th, 2012. From the editorial:
"Taxpayers should be encouraged by complaints from Tea Party chapters
applying for nonprofit tax status at being asked by the Internal Revenue
Service to prove they are 'social welfare' organizations and not the
political activists they so obviously are.
"Such IRS inquiries are long overdue, should be applied across the
board to the growing number of organizations allied with major political
parties that are also ludicrously posing as social welfare groups."
Now, you note the New York Times never writes things like that about
such groups as Media Matters.... There's no way Media
Matters qualifies as a nonpartisan, tax-exempt group. But the New York
Times knew about this in March of 2012.
They knew about it because Tea Party people were complaining about
it, and the New York Times was encouraging the IRS in this..... Just four or
five days ago, the New York Times had an editorial mocking the
Republican efforts on Benghazi. Just four or five days ago. Now that's
blown wide open. So the idea that this Tea Party targeting by the IRS is
something somebody just discovered and only recently learned about is
silly. This was known years ago. In fact, the IRS commissioner Lois
Lerner has admitted that all this was going on as far back as 2011.
I went back to our archives here and I found some things that will jog
your memory. This is a Breitbart.com story from April 3rd of this year.
"Obama: Government Tyranny Impossible Because 'Government Is Us.'" He
was in Colorado. Obama was out pushing gun control. He "made an
astonishing statement about gun rights advocates' fears of governmental
gun seizures. He said that such worries would just feed 'into fears
about government. You hear some of these folks: "I need a gun to protect
myself from the government. 'We can't do background checks because the
government's going to come take my guns away." The government's us.
These officials are elected by you ... I am constrained as they are
constrained by the system that our founders put in place.'"
No, friends, that's the problem. The government is not us anymore.
The government is governing against the will of the people. You go
issue by issue by issue, whatever it is, gun control, vast majority
don't want what the government is doing. Obamacare. Vast majority
don't want what the government is doing. Issue by issue by issue. This
has been the whole bugaboo. Every Obama issue is opposed by a
majority, sometimes a big majority of the American people. Yet every
Obama initiative is being implemented. And in polling data -- this is
what gave birth to the Limbaugh Theorem
-- in polling data, people in poll after poll after poll, by majorities
of sometimes into the 60 percentiles, oppose Obama's agenda, oppose his
policies. But yet these same people give Obama a soaring approval
rating. ...
It's because Obama is seen as constantly campaigning and not
governing, and therefore not really being in charge of everything, and
that's why his answer today to the question about the IRS is right out
of the Limbaugh Theorem. (imitating Obama) "I didn't know what was
going on, just a rogue group over there, low-level workers. If it's
happening, we're gonna find out about it," as though he's got no
fingerprints on it, nothing to do with it. When in fact he is behind
everything that's happening in this government.
He has people in positions in this bureaucracy that are picked and
chosen by him or people anointed by him and he's got like-minded people
everywhere. And some of them predate him, some of these career appointees. You know, the left infests
government. So the idea here that all of this is happening in a vacuum
and Obama doesn't know anything about it, not true....This no longer is a government of,
by, and for the people. This is a government governing against the
will of the people. We pay the government to protect the liberties that
we are guaranteed by the Constitution. They are working to undermine
them.
The Obama regime uses government to punish people. ...And look at Obama in this statement in Denver. "I am constrained, as
they are constrained, by the system that our founders put in place."
That is an unwitting statement of truth. He is constrained -- what does
constrained mean? It means things I can't do. Why is he even thinking
about things he can't do? There are things he wants to do. There are
all kinds of executive orders and waiving of the presidential wand to
make it happen he would love to do. But the Constitution's in his way,
and he wishes it weren't.
I don't look at this
system as constraining. I look at this system as liberating. I look at
the US Constitution, the declaration, our founding documents as
liberating. Obama doesn't. The Democrats don't. They look at them as
limiting them. Liberating individual liberty and freedom, that's the
problem, as far as Obama and his gang are concerned."...
.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment