.
12/12/19, “NATO Wants to Become the Atlantic-Pacific Alliance,” Voltaire, Thierry Meyssan
“No one stops the Pentagon. While the military deployment project around China mentioned by Hillary Clinton in 2011 had officially been abandoned, [in 2019] NATO had just had it endorsed by the London Summit. The process has been launched and is expected to start with Australia’s accession in 2026….
China does not see this war in the same terms as NATO: it intends to move the battlefield into the computer sphere and destroy the weapons of the Enlarged North Atlantic Alliance by cyber attacks before it uses them.
In October 2011, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called in Foreign Policy for a “pivot to Asia": the United States had to leave Europe and the broader Middle East to deploy in the Far East [6]. National Security Advisor Tom Donilon explained this plan in March 2013 to the Asia Society [7]. It included a diplomatic and financial mechanism, the draft Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement. However, very quickly the Pentagon corrected the situation: it would not be a question of abandoning one part of the world for another, but of extending from one to the other. This was the notion of “rebalancing,” the only one compatible with the pursuit of [US taxpayer funded] “war without end" in the wider Middle East. Failing to convince, the Pentagon abruptly ended the debate by stressing that it was impossible from a budgetary point of view to maintain three fronts at the same time [8]. Since then, the Pentagon has acquired many weapons that it has stored in the Pacific.
President Donald Trump tried to stop this mirage by removing the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement as soon as it joined the White House. But nothing doing. The Pentagon is inexorably continuing its march and has just imposed its vision after nine years of talk.
While from the French point of view, NATO is in a state of “brain death,” the Pentagon has begun its transformation into a global organization. All Member States signed the London Declaration without reflection, which states: “We are aware that China’s growing influence and international policies present both opportunities and challenges, to which we must respond together as an Alliance” [9]. The process is underway….
The new Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Alliance Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg quietly went to Sydney in early August [2019] to test Australian leaders who were honoured but frightened by the prospect of having to shelter nuclear missiles [5]. Contacts were made identically with India and Japan, but they were much less fruitful.
In addition, the United States has reviewed its policy
towards South Korea, Indonesia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Thailand and
Vietnam to bring their respective armies closer together. These
states are used to working with Pentagon staff, but not at all with each
other.”…
"[1] “NATO Summit: War Party Strengthens”, by Manlio Dinucci, Translation Roger Lagassé, Il Manifesto (Italy) , Voltaire Network, 8 December 2019.
[2] Whitehall, Peter Hennessy, The Free Press, 1989.
[3] “Six Conflicting Global Projects”, by Thierry Meyssan, Translation Roger Lagassé, Voltaire Network, 19 November 2019.
[4] “US PaCom is now the US IndoPaCom”, Translation Anoosha Boralessa, Voltaire Network, 11 June 2018.
[5] “Australia-US Ministerial Consultations (AUSMIN) 2019”, Voltaire Network, 4 August 2019.
[6] “America’s Pacific Century”, Hillary Clinton, Foreign Policy, October 11, 2011.
[7] “The United States and the Asia-Pacific in 2013”, by Tom Donilon, Voltaire Network, 11 March 2013.
[8] “DoD Official: Asia Pivot ‘Can’t Happen’ Due to Budget Pressures”, Defense News, March 4, 2014.
[9] “London Declaration”, Voltaire Network, 4 December 2019."
...........
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment