6/22/15, "'Al-Ahram' Editor: 'Washington Post' Waging A Vicious Campaign Against Al-Sisi Regime In Service Of Muslim Brotherhood," memri.org
"In an article titled "Political Pamphlets in an American Paper," the editor of the Egyptian government daily Al-Ahram, Muhammad 'Abd Al-Hadi 'Allam, slammed the U.S.'s Washington Post for its frequent attacks on the Egyptian regime since the ouster of former Egyptian president Muhammad Mursi. According to 'Allam, the Washington Post is waging a "vicious campaign" and voicing "open incitement" against Egypt in the service of "terror organizations" such as the Muslim Brotherhood. This, while refraining from criticizing human rights violations or the absence of press freedom in countries like Turkey and Qatar.
The following are excerpts from the article:
"No country in the world [other than Egypt] receives so
much attention in Washington Post editorials, which are
full of a strange and pathetic fury over this country's domestic affairs –
whose number has broken every record in the last few months.
"The press inside and outside Egypt is entitled to write whatever it wants, and we have a right
to tell [our] critics that the strength and the reputation of a great country that is undergoing a process of rehabilitation are not a 'toy' in the hands of interests groups that hammer the readers over the head every morning with editorials that constitute a vicious campaign. [This campaign] first of all undermines the faith in the changes that are currently happening in Egypt, and in its economic growth on the eve of the opening of the new Suez Canal in less than two months.
American paper's editorials [about Egypt] constitutes open incitement against the Egyptian state and against its judiciary, which is presented as a [mere] tool in the hands of the regime.
[This criticism] is part of an ongoing attempt by some Western media to kill the rule of law
[in Egypt] in favor of terrorist organizations that have become masters of deception, cheating
and killing in the name of religion [namely the Muslim Brotherhood].
"During this period, we did not find in this widely-distributed American paper even one investigative article about the ideological roots of the culture that [condones] violence and opposes the nation state. [This is the culture of] the groups of political Islam, which have been the eternal allies of the U.S. and Britain since the 1920s. We never saw [in this paper] a single report about the deadly violence against Egypt's civilians, police officers and military personnel. At the same time, there is plenty of sympathy and compassion for the Muslim Brotherhood and its leaders, who have fled to Arab and foreign countries in order to spread their endless poison. These are the same leaders against whom millions of angry [Egyptians] came out in the June 30 revolution.
"The Egyptian people left the handling of this issue to the police and the military, and let them
deal with this group that is undermining the abilities of the nation states. [So far], we have not
seen or heard that any of the imaginary assessments regarding the imminent collapse of the [Egyptian] state and the shattering of its foundations have come to pass. These papers' efforts to spread [these assessments] is an open game, which most Egyptians receive with a sarcastic smile and with pity for these foreign reporters and for their Egyptian collaborators who see only what they want to see, while ignoring reality.
"The American paper displays overt hostility towards Egypt in its editorials, but it does not dare
direct criticism at countries that never practiced democracy [at all]... [This,] out of concern for
American interests and in order to avoid clashing with interest groups inside [the U.S.] that are close
to those countries. Had the paper been fair, it would have discussed the issue of human rights and freedom of the press in Turkey, [or] the issue of the foreign laborers in Qatar, just as it addresses the situation in Egypt.
"The Egyptians practical response to this paper's claims in recent days regarding empty promises
[made by President Al-Sisi] will come when we invite papers from around the world to attend the
inauguration ceremony of the new Suez Canal and the vast projects associated with it. Then we
will see the promises that the president has undertaken [to fulfill] for the sake of his people –
while other people justify the crimes of the terrorists between the lines [of their articles] and want
the circle of bloodshed to widen and grow. The response of the [Egyptian] state and people in the
coming months will expose the campaign of lies and deception that has been waged in Washington by fugitives from Egyptian justice and by agents [of various parties]. [This campaign] is waged on recruited websites and papers and in foreign papers that are more concerned with destroying the abilities of the Egyptian state than in supporting the interests of their countries.
"The 'political pamphlet' press will fall, even if it originates in the capitals of the very countries
that gave rise to the theory of democracy and turned the Arab East into hell. And in case you have
forgotten, let us remind you of the crime of your silence over the Iraq war and of what your people
did in Abu Ghraib prison, or the disasters that later befell the Arab world!"
 In an article published in Al-Ahram on June 22, columnist Ahmad 'Abd Al-Tawwab likewise
attacked "some large newspapers around the world that lean in favor of the Muslim Brotherhood"
and that have lately been harshly criticizing the Al-Sisi regime and calling it a "coup regime."
According to 'Abd Al-Tawwab, these papers deliberately harm the reputation of the Al-Sisi regime
and blame it for things that are not its fault, with the aim of evoking sympathy for the Muslim Brotherhood. He added that these papers attack Egypt because certain countries "unfriendly to
Egypt" have lately purchased shares in them, and also because they are influenced by the Muslim
Brotherhood's global lobby. He accused the papers of "committing shameful crimes" and called to
hold them accountable. He added that he could understand why Egypt is taking this matter so
lightly, and called it to confront the "deliberate attack and the fabrications."