11/29/14, "Needle on Zero: Nigeria's Economy Tanking as U.S. Oil Exports Dry Up," Robert Windrem, nbcnews.com
"Earlier this month, a delegation from the Council on Foreign Relations visited the Nigerian Embassy in Washington where they were lectured by Ambassador Ade Adefuye on the lack of U.S. support for his government's operations against Boko Haram. Adefuye told the visitors that Washington at first refused to share intelligence with the Nigerian government and also withheld "lethal equipment that would have brought down the terrorists within a short time on the basis of allegations that Nigeria's defense forces have been violating human rights of Boko Haram suspects when captured or arrested.".
The comments were posted
on the front page of the embassy's website, which Pham said wouldn't
have happened without approval from the Nigerian goverment. And the
angry rejoinder itself wouldn't have happened at all in the past, when
relations between the countries were considered too important to risk
ruffling feathers in Washington.
Pham suggested that the lack of oil trade also could lead the U.S. to step back or even away from Nigeria.
.
.
Six years ago, he noted
the U.S. played a key role in negotiations between the Nigerian
government and a group of insurgents known as the Movement for the
Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND), who felt they had been left out
of the economic boom fueled by oil production in the delta. When they
rose up, a third of the nation's oil production was cut off.
"The U.S. coaxed Nigeria
into peace talks with amnesty payments, training, etc., (and)
successive U.S. ambassadors were involved," noted Pham. "Would they be
involved again? Although U.S. companies, like Chevron would be affected,
the U.S. oil supply would not. Would it be easier for a U.S.
administration to not make it a priority?"
.
.
The answer to that
question may be revealed soon. The Nigerian government's agreement with
MEND expires next year and must be renewed. It is not clear if the U.S.
intends to get involved in those negotiations.
Pham also recalled that several
years ago the U.S. Navy's Sixth Fleet helped coordinate a response to
pirate attacks on Nigerian oil tankers, but has not been as forceful in
recent months,
despite an increase in the attacks.
"The pirates in the Gulf
of Guinea are aggressive, but if piracy is not affecting our supply,
there is a danger that our response won't be as robust, particularly
when there are so many other demands on a U.S. Navy that has fewer
ships," he said."...
.
.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment