11/18/14, "Congress Must Act on War Authority," NY Times Editorial Board. 11/19 print ed.
"Military Action in Syria Requires a New A.U.M.F."
"The
United States is fighting a new and costly war in Iraq and Syria. Yet,
for months, members of Congress have ducked their constitutional
responsibility for warmaking. They have neither initiated a meaningful
debate on the use of American force against the Islamic State, which is
known as ISIS, nor shown any inclination to vote on whether to endorse
or modify the mission.
With
the midterm elections over, we had hoped this would change. But,
increasingly, it seems as if the current lame-duck Congress will leave
the issue to the next one.
Republicans
will control both the Senate and the House come January. There are
signs that some want a broad war authorization that could be exploited
to justify military action against terrorist groups geographically
beyond Iraq and Syria, just as the 2001 Authorization for Use of
Military Force, or A.U.M.F., against Al Qaeda was used by the Bush and
Obama administrations to expand operations against other “associated
forces.”
Some
Democrats, including Senate leader Harry Reid, seem oddly passive,
saying they are open to an authorization vote but doing little to
advance it now. At the start of the campaign against ISIS in September,
Mr. Obama insisted he had all the legal authority he needed to attack.
After Election Day, he said he would ask Congress to authorize the
military campaign specifically against ISIS.
Yet
now it seems clear that he has no problem waiting until next year for
Congress to act. The vacillation is not reassuring. Senator Robert
Menendez of New Jersey, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee that has jurisdiction over a use-of-force resolution, has
called for quick action, along with a few other Democrats like Senator
Tim Kaine of Virginia and Representative Adam Schiff of California.
What
Mr. Menendez needs to put forward is a resolution that focuses on the
war on ISIS, not on any far-flung terrorist group, and limits the
fighting to Iraq and Syria.
Although
Mr. Obama has said he will not put American ground forces in Iraq or
Syria, Mr. Schiff’s bill creates a loophole that would allow trainers,
advisers, intelligence officers and special operations forces to be
there. Mr. Kaine’s bill would allow ground forces to rescue American
personnel or attack high-value targets.
While
it is important for Congress to repeal the 2002 authorization for the
Iraq War and terminate the 2001 authorization against Al Qaeda, the
priority in the lame-duck session should be to pass a new and separate
authorization for the war against ISIS.
If
the Senate Foreign Relations Committee is unable to get such an
authorization approved, Mr. Kaine and others should try to attach it as
an amendment to other related legislation. It’s past time for Congress
to exhibit some courage and take a stand."
.
No comments:
Post a Comment