.
9/11/13, "Court Battles key in Colorado Recall Election victories," Examiner.com, Matt Arnold
"Supporters of the incumbents spent over $3 Million (mostly coming from
out-of-state special interests) while supporters of the Recall spent
nearly $500,000....
Finally, the court case that didn’t happen (but probably should have) –
allowing the out-of-state money machine to funnel massive contributions
to the anti-Recall forces while skirting campaign finance laws.
Challenging the multiple anti-Recall committees before an administrative
law judge (ALJ) would have not only highlighted how money was shifted
around by various special-interest groups to avoid campaign contribution
limits and reporting requirements, but also (if successful) could have
resulted in fines and penalties to the Bloomberg-backed machine in
excess of $1M (yes, that’s one MILLION dollars)."...
===============
20% of voters who signed petitions to recall the Pueblo democrat in a heavily democrat county were democrat themselves:
9/10/13, "Colorado recall election voter turnout mixed, figures show," Denver Post, Lynn Bartels, Joey Bunch, Kurtis Lee
"Giron's district in
Pueblo County, where Democrats comprise 47 percent of all registered
voters and Republicans just 23 percent, Democrats have the vote lead,
but there's a catch. Pueblo is a blue-collar, blue-dog Democratic town
and 20 percent of the voters who signed petitions to recall the senator
were Democrats."...
===================
The gun issue was likely secondary in their removal from office. The primary reason was their disdain for due process:
9/11/13, "The Colorado Recalls Explained," David Kopel, Volokh.com
"At Morse’s instruction, only 90 minutes of testimony per side were
allowed on each of the gun bills. As a result, hundreds of Colorado
citizens were prevented from testifying even briefly. Many of them had
driven hours to come to the Capitol, traveling from all over the state.
That same day, 30 Sheriffs came to testify. They too were shut out,
with only a single Sheriff allowed to testify on any given bill. So
while one Sheriff testified, others stood up with him in support.
Admirably, Morse had urged his Committee Chairs to be polite and
courteous to all witnesses, and they were. But President Morse did not
follow the standard practice of the Colorado legislature, by which any
citizen who wishes to testify is allowed to be heard, at least briefly.
The patient endurance of Colorado legislative committees which have
heard hour upon hour of testimony on bills about gay rights, motorcycle
helmets, and other social controversies is a tribute to our republican
form of government.
When Morse shut that down, and Chairperson Giron went along, they
crossed the double-red line of Colorado government. Had the seven gun
control bills (one of which I testified in favor) been heard on March
4-6, instead of being rammed through committees on March 4, the recall
might never have happened. It’s one thing to lose; it’s another to thing
to lose when you didn’t even have the opportunity to present your
reasoning. While the gun control bills were before the Senate in March,
President Morse urged his caucus to stop reading emails, to stop reading
letters from constituents, to stop listening to voicemails, to vote for
the gun bills and ignore the constituents. Giron, presciently following
this strategy, had allowed citizens to raise Second Amendment concerns
at a single town hall meeting, and thereafter refused to discuss the
issue at public fora.
If an 8:1 Bloomberg money advantage can’t buy an election, then
elected officials will be more reluctant to support repressive gun
bills. As Giron told The New Republic, “”For Mayors Against
Illegal Guns, if they lose even one of these seats, they might as well
fold it up. And they understand that.”
There were other issues too, including the dubious claim the
Republicans Herpin and Rivera would take away women’s birth control
pills, as well as discredited financial ethic charges against Morse.
The Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms was the secondmost
important reason why Morse and Giron were removed from office. The first
reason was the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment principle of Due Process
of Law. The opportunity to be heard is the fundamental to Due Process of
Law, and not solely in adjudications. When Morse and Giron squelched
the testimony of law-abiding citizens and of law-enforcing Sheriffs,
they grossly abused their constitutional office of being law-makers. And
so, for abuse of office, John Morse and Angela Giron have been recalled
from office by the People of Colorado, to be replaced by legislators
who will listen before the vote."
==================================
Commenter stunned that Giron "treats those who
elected her like subjects, not citizens:"
". 4 hours ago
.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment