Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Mexican Cardinal objects to global government influence in western countries as evidenced in recent Mexico Supreme Court decisions. Says Russia, China, and Arab countries have managed to retain their own national governments

.
6/30/15, "Mexican cardinal: (Mexican) Supreme Court is puppet of ‘new order’ seeking to destroy marriage and Church," lifesitenews, Matthew Cullinan Hoffman 

Cardinal Juan Sandoval Iniguez, archbishop of Guadalajara

"Cardinal Juan Sandoval Iniguez, the archbishop emeritus of Guadalajara, Mexico, has produced a video denouncing the Mexican Supreme Court’s recent declaration imposing homosexual “marriage” on the entire country as a machination of those seeking to create a global government and a “new order,” and lamenting the weak response from Catholic bishops, who have failed to mobilize the faithful in opposition.

In the video broadcast on the Catholic television network Mariavision and widely distributed on the internet, Sandoval says that Mexico’s Supreme Court is seeking to “destroy marriage itself” by its recent declaration nullifying state laws defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman, and associating the institution with procreation.  He then repeats an accusation that he has made several times since 2011: that the Court is being influenced by bribes received from international organizations.

“Marriage, in accordance with nature, is a man and a woman, and it is also so in accordance with Christian revelation,” said Sandoval. “Marriage is a man and a woman. Anything more is something deviant. And if you ask why the Supreme Court is engaged in this, where the pressure is coming from, from where are they receiving, perhaps, great donations and great amounts of money, and as I have said, the ‘feeding’ [of the judges], from where these influences are coming for the Supreme Court to be legislating these things, always against morality, the fundamental problem is that there are international organizations at the service of a project that is called the ‘new order,’ a plan for global government.”"...

[Ed. note: The Cardinal is correct. In 2011 the Vatican called for "global public authority" led by UN to oversee "fair distribution of world wealth" and "global political society." In 2014 Pope Francis told a UN meeting that wealth should be redistributed "by the state." "The state" and the Catholic Church are pals. US government "redistributed" $2.6 billion to Catholic groups in 2008 alone.]

(continuing): "“Russia, China, and the Arab world have now escaped from their hands,” Sandoval noted. “They don’t dominate them, but in Western countries they want to establish a single government and they want to use it to destroy the family, the Catholic Church, which are in their way, as well as the true national governments. And one of the means for destroying the family is to pervert the concept itself of the family, to speak of matrimony as a union of people, so that the definition applies to any bond or union. It’s very lamentable, very sad.”

The cardinal also decried the “rather lamentable silence” on the part of “those of us who are pastors of the Church, who don’t speak clearly, who don’t denounce, who don’t organize our faithful to offer resistance.” The Church’s leadership could fight back by “organizing, for example, the gathering of signatures, whether for the Supreme Court or for the national congress, for local congresses, many signatures that say clearly that they do not want such legislation.  It’s very important for the good of the country that marriage be healthy, that marriage be what it should be and not be perverted.”

Sandoval expressed his confidence that the upcoming Synod of Bishops, to be held in the Vatican in October, will issue a clear reaffirmation of the Church’s traditional teaching. “The position of the Synod of the pope cannot be any other than what is fixed in the pages of Sacred Scripture: God made them man and woman, and commanded that they unite...so that they may be fertile. Whatever departs from this divine institution is an attack against it and is an aberration, and it can never fit into the mind of a Catholic, of a Christian.”

In response to the cardinal’s statements, multiple homosexual organizations say they have filed criminal complaints or are planning to do so, including a coalition of groups that accuse Sandoval of “discrimination and inciting violence” by calling homosexual “marriage” an “aberration,” according to the Spanish news agency EFE. Mexico’s Milenio newspaper reports  that one homosexualist group, the Cohesion of Diversities for Sustainability (CODISE), plans to file a complaint against Sandoval with the federal Secretariat of Governance, as well as against the seminary of Guadalajara because they “give a talk that incites hatred and discrimination and that generates confusion among heterosexual parents regarding the rejection of their homosexual children, and creates a repressive and suicidal mentality in their homosexual children.”" image from Lifesite News

....................................
...........................................

Two citations for Vatican calling for world government, 2011, 2014:

10/24/2011, "Towards Reforming Financial and Monetary Systems in the Context of Global Public Authority," Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, The Vatican, Peter K.A. Cardinal Turkson, President, Bishop Mario Toso, Secretary

"With due respect for the competent civil and political authorities, the Council hereby offers and shares its reflection: Towards reforming the international financial and monetary systems in the context of global public authority....

The G20 leaders themselves said in the Statement they adopted in Pittsburgh in 2009: “The economic crisis demonstrates the importance of ushering in a new era of sustainable global economic activity grounded in responsibility” (3)....   

We hope that world leaders and all people of good will find this reflection helpful."...
......................... 
2nd to last paragraph in subhead 3. "An Authority over Globalization:"  

"A long road still needs to be travelled before arriving at the creation of a public Authority with universal jurisdiction. It would seem logical for the reform process to proceed with the United Nations as its reference because of the worldwide scope of the UN’s responsibilities, its ability to bring together the nations of the world, and the diversity of its tasks and those of its specialized Agencies. The fruit of such reforms ought to be a greater ability to adopt policies and choices that are binding because they are aimed at achieving the common good on the local, regional and world levels. Among the policies, those regarding global social justice seem most urgent: financial and monetary policies that will not damage the weakest countries(19); and policies aimed at achieving free and stable markets and a fair distribution of world wealth, which may also derive from unprecedented forms of global fiscal solidarity, which will be dealt with later. On the way to creating a world political Authority, questions of governance (that is, a system of merely horizontal coordination without a higher authority super partes) cannot be separated from those of a shared government (that is, a system which in addition to horizontal coordination establishes a higher authority super partes) which is functional and proportionate to the gradual development of a global political society."...via Rosa Koire, Democrats Against UN Agenda 21
.................

=====================

At 2014 UN speech in Rome, Pope Francis says earned wages must be taken from workers "by the state" and redistributed. Ban Ki-Moon invites Francis to speak at UN:

5/9/2014, "Pope urges 'legitimate redistribution' of wealth," AP, Nicole Winfield 

"Pope Francis called Friday for governments to redistribute wealth and benefits to the poor in a new spirit of generosity to help curb the "economy of exclusion" that is taking hold today.

Francis made the appeal during a speech to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and the heads of major U.N. agencies who met in Rome this week. Latin America's first pope has frequently lashed out at the injustices of capitalism and the global economic system. On Friday, Francis called for the United Nations to promote a "worldwide ethical mobilization" of solidarity with the poor.

He said a more equal form of economic progress can be had through "the legitimate redistribution of economic benefits by the state, as well as indispensable cooperation between the private sector and civil society.""....

..............................
............................ 

Citation for US government's massive support of Catholic Church:

Nov. 2009 article: "The bishops have a long history of almost unlimited access to enormous quantities of federal funding....Sixty-seven percent of Catholic Charities’ income comes from government funding.... That represents over $2.6 billion in 2008."

11/10/2009, "The Catholic bishops' double standard," Politico, by Nancy Keenan and Jon O'Brien

"The bishops have a long history of almost unlimited access to enormous quantities of federal funding. When it comes to funding for Catholic schools and hospitals or programs run by Catholic Charities, they accept federal funding with open arms. The bishops never question their own ability to lawfully manage funds from separate sources to ensure that tax dollars don’t finance religious practices."... 

........................................

=====================
==================== 

Comment: The mafia can only dream of being an operation like the UN. Nothing about the UN is "ethical." It was invented by US politicians to bleed US taxpayers. Though not elected by or accountable to them, US politicians think it's a good idea to force taxpayers to turn over large portions of their earnings yearly to thousands of UN personnel on a no-strings basis. No UN employee can be prosecuted for any crime anywhere in the world. They're exempt from all laws. They can put all the US taxpayer money in personal bank accounts without consequence. As bad as the Pope is, the UN isn't his fault. The UN exists only because the US political class wants it to.




........................

NYPD officer simulates sex on the street with Gay Pride Parade marcher

.















"This cop got into the spirit of New York's Pride Parade on Sunday, dancing happily with a participant."

6/29/15, "SEE IT: NYPD officer dances enthusiastically with Pride Parade marcher," NY Daily News, Aliza Chasan

"This is the New York City cop who grooved his way into the celebratory spirit of Sunday’s Pride Parade.

An NYPD officer danced with marcher Aaron Santis, 29, in a video posted to YouTube by Paige Ponzeka. "The officer was just standing there, stoic, not really doing anything, just watching the parade, and Aaron just started dancing up against him," Ponzeka said. "A little while into it, the officer just started dancing with him."

The two men grind and shake their arms to Michael Jackson’s “Don’t Stop ‘Til You Get Enough.” At the end of the video, Santis, who marched with the LGBT Big Apple Softball League, pats an "I'd hit that" sticker onto the officer’s uniform and gives the grinning cop a kiss on the cheek....

The NYPD didn’t immediately respond when asked if the officer would be disciplined for dancing suggestively in uniform.

Two officers who danced with women at the West Indian Day Parade in 2011 were not disciplined."


 =========================

















6/29/15, "NYPD Officer Bumps, Grinds, Simulates Sex with Gay Pride Parade Member," Breitbart, William Bigelow

"On Sunday, one NYPD officer joyfully danced with a member of the gay pride parade, bumping and grinding and letting the parade member get behind him and simulate sex on the street in front of appreciative onlookers.

Afterward, the gay pride parade member gave the officer a nice hug and kiss, while the officer beamed.

The gay parade-dancing officer had precedent: In 2011, NYPD officers did some bumping and grinding of their own with revelers at the West Indian-American Day Carnival. One report said that an officer was “daggering” a lucky recipient." Image: Paige Ponzeka/YouTube




................................

Monday, June 29, 2015

Pope Francis plans to chew coca leaves during upcoming visit to Bolivia-BBC

.
6/29/15, "Pope 'plans to chew coca leaves during Bolivia visit'," BBC

"Pope Francis has requested to chew coca leaves during his forthcoming visit to Bolivia, according to Bolivian Culture Minister Marko Machicao. 

Coca, the raw ingredient for cocaine, has been used in the Andes for thousands of years to combat altitude sickness and as a mild stimulant.

Mr Machicao said the government offered the Pope coca tea and the pontiff had "specifically requested" to chew coca.

The Vatican has not yet commented. The Pope travels to Bolivia on 8 July. 

Coca leaves were declared an illegal substance under the 1961 UN convention on narcotic drugs.

But the growing of coca leaves for religious and medicinal purposes is legal and licensed in Bolivia.


Many indigenous Bolivians consider the coca bush a sacred plant and chewing its leaves or brewing them into a tea is very popular.  
Bolivia's 2009 constitution even declared the coca leaf "a cultural patrimony".

President Evo Morales, who used to be a coca grower, has long campaigned to decriminalise the consumption of coca leaves.

If the Pope were to chew coca leaves during his visit to the Andean country it would provide strong backing for Mr Morales's campaign.

"We will be awaiting the Holy Father with the sacred coca leaf," Mr Machicao said. The Pope's visit to Bolivia is part of a larger tour of Latin American countries which will also take him to Ecuador and Paraguay."



..................................

Unsettled science: Faulty science said white roofs atop any building would save energy and decrease CO2. New science finds white roofs in northern and central climates result in greater energy use, more CO2, and waste money. LEED program still uses false science-Philly.com

.
6/29/2015, "'Green' roofs not always the most energy-efficient," philly.com, Craig A. Tyler

"Five years ago, Philadelphia City Council passed a green building code requiring that white roofs be used on certain buildings because they are more energy-efficient and help reduce air pollution.

New York and Chicago have similar codes. But the white-roof craze is based on old and faulty research that has promulgated two myths - that these roofs save energy atop any building and that they decrease global warming.

Philadelphians should be concerned that the city is wasting money on energy and possibly causing more, not less, global warming.

There is a significant heating penalty associated with using white roofs in central and northern climates, where owners use three to five times as much energy to heat their buildings than to cool them. In cities like Philly, white roofs consume more energy, which means they cause more cardon dioxide emissions.

A study by Arizona State University shows that white roofs can deflect sunlight into the atmosphere, changing cloud cover and reducing rain. A study by Stanford University simulated what would happen if all the roofs in the United States were converted to white and found that the sunlight reflected by white roofs causes heat to mix with black and brown soot particles to further warm the atmosphere.

Yet this green myth continues. Architects and builders started specifying white roofs 15 years ago, when the U.S. Green Building Council established a new green standard known as Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). Today, more than 18,000 professionals nationwide hold LEED credentials, more than 1,000 of them in the Philadelphia region.

The LEED certification system has done a lot of good by recognizing building projects for their environmental quality. It also has influenced public policy, provided important educational opportunities, and generally made cost-efficient, energy-saving buildings a reality across the nation.

But as new studies like those mentioned emerged, architects, builders, and others involved in sustainable construction realized there is a flaw in the LEED point system. By using white roofing materials, they could earn a point for helping a city like Philly stay cooler and therefore lower air-conditioning demand and natural-resource consumption for electricity generation. But the fact that they would spend more on heating costs was not always factored into the equation.

At least the Environmental Protection Agency acknowledges that energy savings provided by white roofs are highly dependent on location and climate. The agency recommends using the Department of Energy's roof savings calculator to determine if the heating penalty exceeds the cooling benefit.

I used the calculator for a 75,000-square-foot building in Philadelphia to compare a white roof with a black roof. Given a certain level of insulation and energy pricing, a three-story building that size would lose $636 annually in energy costs. A one-story building would lose a whopping $2,200.

The LEED program would be strengthened by limiting the point for white roofs to urban settings in southern climates, where cooling demand outweighs heating demand, not in cities like Philadelphia.

Until such a change is made, architects and builders unfortunately will be encouraged to design and build facilities that use more energy than they should and that also may increase carbon dioxide emissions and global warming. Architects and building owners in Philadelphia can act on this new information to improve the environment by limiting the use of white roofs in northern climates while we wait for LEED to change." via Hockey Schtick

....................................................


"Craig Tyler is a LEED-certified architect employed by Carlisle SynTec, a manufacturer of white, tan, gray, and black roofing in Carlisle, Pa. craig.tyler@carlislesyntec.com" 



............

 

Catholic Charities received over $2.6 billion from federal government in 2008-Politico. Funding for state and national Catholic groups has increased under Obama-Catholic lobby

.
Nov. 2009 article: "The bishops have a long history of almost unlimited access to enormous quantities of federal funding....Sixty-seven percent of Catholic Charities’ income comes from government funding."

11/10/2009, "The Catholic bishops' double standard," Politico, by Nancy Keenan and Jon O'Brien

"The bishops have a long history of almost unlimited access to enormous quantities of federal funding. When it comes to funding for Catholic schools and hospitals or programs run by Catholic Charities, they accept federal funding with open arms. The bishops never question their own ability to lawfully manage funds from separate sources to ensure that tax dollars don’t finance religious practices. Yet they reject the idea that others could do the same. This is the very definition of hypocrisy.

For example, Catholic hospitals depend on federal funding. Indiana has 35 Catholic hospitals and 26 other Catholic health-care facilities. In 2007, 58 percent of patients who visited these facilities were covered by Medicaid or Medicare, a proportion reflected across the country. With well over half of their revenue coming from the government, it is safe to say that Catholic hospitals survive on government funding as well as contributions from private sources.

Catholic Charities, the domestic direct service arm of the bishops, also depends on state and federal dollars. Sixty-seven percent of Catholic Charities’ income comes from government funding. That represents over $2.6 billion in 2008— an amount that is more than three times as large as the next largest charitable recipient of federal funds, the YMCA. Just as Catholic hospitals do, Catholic Charities receives enormous quantities of government dollars while abiding by existing constitutional and statutory requirements that prevent government sponsorship of religion.

The bishops know that a vast majority of Americans, including Catholics, disagree with their hard-line dictates regarding reproductive-health care, including the bishops’ opposition to contraception."...

"Nancy Keenan is president of NARAL Pro-Choice America and Jon O’Brien is president of Catholics for Choice."

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29377.html

.....................................

=========================

2012 press release from a Catholic lobby notes increased flow of US taxpayer dollars to state and national Catholic groups under Obama: 

1/31/2012, "Setting the Record Straight on Federal Funding for Catholic Organizations," networklobby.org

"CONTACT: Stephanie Niedringhaus, 202-347-9797 x224, sniedringhaus@networklobby.org. Washington DC: NETWORK today issued the following statement regarding federal funding of Catholic human needs programs:...

Catholic groups and members of the Obama administration have had some disagreements in recent weeks, but we at NETWORK believe that some Catholic complaints have been exaggerated or misinformed. 

One area of disagreement concerns the continuing level of government funding for vital Catholic programs. The truth of the matter is that the Obama administration has actually increased funding for Catholic nonprofit organizations and programs. In fact, more than $1.5 billion went to Catholic organizations over the past two years.[2010-2011]

Funding increases for Catholic organizations in recent years include the following:

  • An increase from $12.45 million (2008) to $57.89 million (2011) in USDA food assistance to Catholic Relief Services (CRS)
  • An increase from  just over $440 million (2008) to more than $554 million (2010) to Catholic Charities USA
  • Increases in Dept. of Labor grants to Catholic organizations such as Catholic Charities of Kansas for ex-offender reintegration and other programs from $300,000 (2009) to more than $5 million (2011)
  • An increase of HHS funding for Catholic Medical Mission Board global health activities from $500,000 (2008) to $7 million (2011)."...



.............

Ann Coulter: Put 10 year freeze on all immigration. Gov. unable to enforce laws. Republicans can win with white vote but white voters embarrass the GOP. Republican Party has ignored white voters since Reagan

.
6/27/15, "Coulter to PJM: Cut Off All Immigration, Focus on White Voters to Win," PJ Media, Nicholas Ballasy

"Author and political commentator Ann Coulter said there should be a 10-year freeze on immigration to the U.S. since the federal government has demonstrated it cannot enforce current law.

There’s a law on the books that says if a country will not take a criminal back the attorney general shall, not may, shall deny visas, any visas coming from that country – that is on the books right now. Has it been enforced by Republicans or Democrats? No, it has not,” Coulter said during an interview with PJ Media.

“There’s a law on the books right now that says an immigrant who has been convicted of a crime in America who does not cooperate in being sent home, that itself is a crime, not signing the papers, not showing up when you’re supposed to, that itself is a crime punishable by 4 years in prison – that’s never enforced. It's just not enforced. Three times Congress has voted to build a fence and it never gets built,” she added.

According to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) released 33,007 illegal immigrants with criminal records in 2013. Following these releases, 121 were charged with homicides.

Based on the research Coulter conducted, she concluded that a legal fix is not going to improve the immigration system.

“The entire thing has to be shut down. No more immigration for 10 years. We get our books in order. 

We assimilate the ones already here. Build a fence. Repeal anchor babies and then we start up with the pre-1970 immigration policies,” Coulter said.

It’s not just Obama; Bush was the same way. Bush didn’t enforce it, either. The entire immigration bureaucracy is corrupt. It is run by and staffed by left-wingers who hate America who in other times would have been fighting with revolutionaries in Latin America and getting themselves arrested. 

Now they punish Americans here at home. They say we are racist, sexist, imperialistic, greedy, they want to transform America because they hate America,” she added.

Coulter told PJ Media that Republicans can win in 2016 without substantial support from the Hispanic community.

“If Romney had won the Hispanic vote by 71 percent, which Republicans are never going to get in a presidential election, he still would have lost. If he got 4 percentage points more of the white vote he would have won,Coulter said during an interview about her new book, Adios, America. Republicans for years have been embarrassed for getting white votes. Why should white votes be embarrassing?

Despite this, Coulter said there are some arguments Republicans can make to appeal to minorities.

“Particularly it’s African-Americans who are hurt the most by all of this low-wage immigration. It’s driving their wages down. It’s killing them in the job market and not coincidentally, as I point out in my book, Pete Wilson, who ran in California in 1994 and got the highest percentage of any Republican running in California in about half a century by tying himself with titanium chords to Proposition 187 and won a huge come-from-behind victory,” she said.

Proposition 187 was a ballot imitative that called for the creation of a system to prevent illegal immigrants from receiving public benefits.

Coulter also said Romney received 20 percent of the young African American male vote because of his “self-deportation” position on immigration. She argued that the Republican nominee could take tough positions on illegal immigration and defeat the Democratic nominee in 2016.

“Immigration both legal and illegal is killing African-Americans. So generally there’s a lot of ethnic voting; I wouldn’t hang my hat on winning with the black vote or winning with some sliver of the Hispanic vote but whites, number one, are still a majority in this country and number two, they are still Republican voters,” she said. “Again, the Democrats can’t get white voters to vote for them and three, basically since Ronald Reagan, Republicans have been ignoring the white vote.”" via Lucianne




..............

Mafia has easy access to Australia politicians, donates to them via loopholes. Calabrian Mafia operates in legitimate businesses such as fruits and vegetables as well as illegitimate businesses like drugs-Australian Broadcasting

.
6/28/15, "Mafia in Australia: Major drug trafficking group linked to senior politicians, investigation reveals," abc.net.au (Australia)

"Links between the Calabrian Mafia and senior Australian politicians have been uncovered in a joint investigation by Four Corners and Fairfax newspapers.

The year-long investigation found the Calabrian Mafia, known as 'Ndrangheta, had used a number of well-known party donors to put a "legitimate public face" on its activities.

The 'Ndrangheta is one of the world's most powerful criminal groups and is thought to be one of the major players in the world of international drug trafficking.

In Australia it operates using threats and violence in both legitimate businesses, such as fruit and vegetables, and illegitimate businesses, such as drugs.

The investigation has revealed a series of contacts between known and suspected criminals and senior politicians.

On one occasion, a man with deep mafia associations met then prime minister John Howard and other top Liberal Party figures at a fundraising event. It is not suggested that Mr Howard knew of the connection.

The investigation has also revealed donors have lobbied on behalf of a mafia figure to a host of Liberal and Labor MPs over issues related to their businesses.

Son of alleged mafia boss did work experience at embassy

Four Corners can reveal the son of another alleged mafia boss did work experience at the Australian embassy in Rome while former Liberal minister Amanda Vanstone was ambassador.

Prior to his placement, Italian authorities were sharing sensitive information about the alleged mafia boss through the embassy.

While there is no direct evidence the embassy placement — which involved the man's son working in a clerical role — led to any actual security breaches, security agencies have described it as a major lapse.

Ms Vanstone, who is now retired from politics, is also at the centre of another episode uncovered during the investigation.

When she was immigration minister in the Howard government, she granted a visa for a crime boss who was later jailed for drug trafficking and implicated in a murder plot.

The man, who is the brother of a well-known Melbourne businessman, has an extensive criminal history in Italy.

He was set to be deported, but his family used its money and influence to conduct a lobbying campaign with some of the country's most powerful Liberal politicians — including Ms Vanstone.
...............
Eventually in 2005, the man was granted a visa to stay in Australia on humanitarian grounds.

There is no suggestion Ms Vanstone acted improperly in either case, though confidential police assessments suggest it indicates her South Australian Senate office had likely been ingratiated by mafia figures.

Just a couple of years later, the man was implicated in one of Australia's largest ever drug busts.

'Lack of checks' in donations system leading to 'loopholes'

The report also details how "loopholes" in the donations system, and the long-running failure to reform it, continue to expose Australian politicians to potential corruption.

Through Freedom of Information laws, the investigation obtained a 2009 AFP report that described a "lack of checks and oversight" in the Australian political donations system as "significant" failings.

"As it stands, political parties and candidates can receive significant support and financial contributions through avenues not covered by the statutory disclosure regime," the AFP report said.

"Loopholes" in the oversight system mean it is "difficult to identify any bribery in the form of political donations".

The report states the Australian Electoral Commission has attempted to address this on many occasions, but that many amendments have not been passed by the Federal Parliament.

The document was written after an investigation into the mafia's fundraising activities.

Who are the 'Ndrangheta?

  • A mafia group from Calabria in the south of Italy. There are thought to be roughly 6,000 members in the world today.
  • Whilst not as well-known as the Sicilian mafia, the 'Ndrangheta is the most powerful criminal organisation in the world.
  • The group earned the equivalent of around 3 per cent of Italy's gross domestic product in 2014, mostly from illegal drugs.
  • Instead of the pyramid structure of bosses used by other mafia groups, the 'Ndrangheta recruits members on the criterion of blood relationships and marriages.
  • The group's best-known crime was the 1973 kidnap of the grandson of oil tycoon John Paul Getty. His ear was chopped off to garner a ransom from his grandfather.
  • Known as "The Honoured Society" in Australia and reportedly involved in the Victoria Market murders in 1963."
"Watch Four Corners — The Mafia in Australia: Drugs, Murder and Politics tonight at 8:30 on ABC. The program will also be available on ABC iView.

Next week Four Corners will look at the inside story of the world's biggest ecstasy bust, the next crop of mafia leaders in Australia and one senior Mafioso's Labor connection."




.......

Sunday, June 28, 2015

Over 92% of US Catholic Refugee funding in 2011 was US taxpayer dollars funneled to them. While receiving this US gov. cash, the Catholic Church kindly advocated gov. so-called Dream Act-Catholic World News

.
8/29.2012, "Federal funds account for nearly 93% of USCCB’s migration/refugee budget," Catholic World News, catholicculture.org

"The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Migration and Refugee Services has published its 2011 annual report.

According to the report, over 92.5% of Migration and Refugee Services’ $72.1 million budget came from federal grants and contracts, while under $25,000 came from private donations. 

Nearly 80% of expenses were allotted to diocesan programs and direct assistance to refugees and other clients. In 2011, Migration and Refugee Services resettled 14,285 people--25% of refugees entering the United States.

Between 2006 and 2011, Migration and Refugee Services assisted 2,735 victims of human trafficking before the Department of Health and Human Services’ controversial decision not to renew its grant to the USCCB. 

During 2011, Migration and Refugee Services also advocated for the passage of the DREAM Act."




.................

Organizations tied to Catholic Church cash in on lucrative Italy migrant center contracts-Reuters

.
"The migrant reception centers are often run under contract by companies linked to social cooperative organizations, often tied to the Catholic Church."

6/5/15, "Italy junior minister investigated in corruption probe," Reuters

"Italian prosecutors placed a junior member of Prime Minister Matteo Renzi's government under investigation in a growing political corruption scandal over alleged fraud and contract rigging at migrant reception centers, officials said on Friday.

The announcement came a day after police arrested 44 people and placed 21 others under investigation in the same case.

Prosecutors in Catania, Sicily, said they had included Giuseppe Castiglione, undersecretary for agriculture and a member of Renzi's center-right coalition partners, on a list of officials targeted in the so-called "Mafia Capital" investigation which has been running since last year.

Castiglione, the first member of the national government to be directly implicated in the case, said he had not been officially informed he was under investigation and he denied any wrongdoing....

The alleged rigging of contracts at migrant reception centers is only one part of the Mafia Capitale investigation, which has uncovered evidence of a wider system of corruption organized by a network of politicians and businessmen.

The burgeoning scandal has largely involved local politicians in Rome, although it has caused serious embarrassment to Renzi's center-left Democratic Party (PD), which currently runs the city administration.

But it has underlined the extent to which unscrupulous operators have been able to exploit the migrant crisis in the Mediterranean, which has left authorities struggling to handle the tens of thousands of refugees arriving by boat.

The migrant reception centers are often run under contract by companies linked to social cooperative organizations, often tied to the Catholic Church. The alleged organizers of the scheme are accused of fixing tenders to win management contracts.
 
Castiglione's name was linked to allegations that officials fixed contracts to manage the migrant reception center in the Sicilian town of Mineo, the same center where survivors were taken after a disaster in April in which as many as 800 people died."

(Reporting by James Mackenzie; Editing by Gareth Jones)"

....................................
=======================

Migrant centers have proved a rich source of income for social organizations in Italy:  

6/4/15, "Italian police arrest 44 over migrant center corruption," Reuters

"Italian police said they arrested 44 people on Thursday suspected of being part of a network of corrupt politicians and business people in Rome accused of rigging public contracts to manage migrant reception centers.

The arrests follow the discovery of a vast system of corruption in the Rome city government last year -- a case dubbed "Mafia Capital" which prompted the city hall to ask the national anti-corruption authority to investigate a list of suspect public contracts.

Rome police said search warrants were also issued against another 21 people in the area around Rome, L'Aquila in central Italy and Catania and Enna in Sicily.

They said the investigation had uncovered a widespread system designed to allow a cartel of companies to win lucrative public contracts to manage migrant reception centers.

The centers, often run on contract by cooperative social organizations, have proved a rich source of income for unscrupulous operators as the Mediterranean migrant boat crisis has intensified, leaving authorities struggling to deal with the tens of thousands of arrivals.

"We need to stop the boat departures and stop the public tenders immediately," Matteo Salvini, head of the anti-immigrant Northern League party said following the latest arrests.

The case has underlined the persistent problem of political corruption in Italy, which ranked 69 out of 177 countries in the latest index by Transparency International, the global anti-corruption group.

Police said "Mafia Capital" was based around a network running back over many years in Rome involving local politicians, business people and criminals linked to violent neo-fascist groups active in the 1970s and 1980s.

They said the cartel had been able to secure "significant economic benefits" by fixing public contracts to manage migrant reception centers and excluding rival bidders.


In addition to the "Mafia Capital" case last year, there were also high profile scandals around the award of public contracts for the Milan Expo and the Venice flood barrier corporation."


............................

Morally bankrupt Pope Francis and Turkson seek daily bread of US taxpayer wages. Child rape expenses cited in 14 US Catholic org. bankruptcies don't need to harm Vatican real estate portfolio

.
Vatican seeks daily bread from US taxpayers. One 2011 priest pedophilia settlement involved 500 cases of abuse by Pope Francis's fellow Jesuits in northwest US. No need to bother the Vatican's real estate portfolio.















3/25/2011, "NW (US) Jesuits to pay $166 million to sexual abuse victims," by Janet I. Tu, Seattle Times 

"In one of the largest settlements nationwide in the Roman Catholic Church's sexual-abuse crisis, the Jesuits will pay $166.1 million to about 500 abuse victims — many of them Native Americans or Alaska Natives."... Image from Bishop-Accountability.org.

...............................
=====================

Pope Francis and Cardinal Turkson start with the least "moral authority" on the planet and go downhill. They're silent on starvation and genocide of the world's poorest via ethanol:

Biofuels were called “a crime against humanity” in 2007 by Jean Ziegler, the UN’s special rapporteur. "In August (2007) the first riots took place among the peasant farmers being driven off the land (in India) to make way for them (biofuels)." 2007 UK Guardian article:

11/7/2007, "An Agricultural Crime Against Humanity," UK Guardian, George Monbiot 

"With every increment in the price of flour or grain, several million more are pushed below the breadline."...

--------------------------
================

2nd citation on ethanol, CO2 danger investor Mike Bloomberg freely states ethanol murders the world's poorest:

2/11/2008, "Bloomberg slams US Energy law over corn ethanol" Reuters by Louis Charbonneau and Timothy Gardner

"A new U.S. energy law will cause an increase in world food prices and lead to starvation deaths worldwide because it continues to promote corn ethanol, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said on Monday.

"People literally will starve to death in parts of the world, it always happens when food prices go up," Bloomberg told reporters after addressing a U.N. General Assembly debate on climate change."...

 -----------------------------
==================================

Morally bankrupt Vatican remains silent in the face of Christian genocide including beheading of children:

Catholic Online:  The world watches beheading and genocide of Christians in "the epitome of shame:"

8/8/2014, "WARNING GRAPHIC PHOTOS (RAW) - ISIS begins killing Christians in Mosul, CHILDREN BEHEADED," catholic.org, CatholicOnline


Image caption: "All humanity owes a debt to this baby girl, to find her murderers and bring them to justice, dead or alive. That the nations of the world and its citizens sit complacent is the greatest embarrassment to civilization and should be the source of deep shame to all. Everything less that we do is pales by comparison. We have a moral imperative to act."...

"The killings have begun. The world does the least it can do. Islamic State terrorists have begun their promised killing of Christians in Mosul, and they have started with the children."...


...................................

Newsweek cover, 3/26/2015, "The New Exodus: Christians Flee ISIS in the Middle East," by and  



















----------------------------
.......................
"“Dogs were eating the bodies of the dead, said Haji Khedev Haydev, 65, who ran through the lines of Islamic State jihadists surrounding it....On Thursday alone, up to 100,000 Iraqi Christians fled their homes." 

8/10/2014, "Iraq crisis: 'It is death valley. Up to 70 per cent of them are dead'," UK Telegraph,


===============================
========================

In a 2014 interview at the Vatican, Pope Francis said he didn't want to discuss "persecuted Christians," because he didn't want to "offend anyone:"

6/16/2014, "Full Text of Pope Francis’ Interview With ‘La Vanguardia’," National Catholic Register, EWTN News, Vatican City

"“The persecuted Christians are a concern that touches me very deeply as a pastor. I know a lot about persecutions, but it doesn’t seem prudent to talk about them here, so I don’t offend anyone.""...



=========================
==========================

As of Jan. 2015, 14 US Catholic organizations have filed for bankruptcy, 12 dioceses plus two Catholic groups, Oregon Province of the Jesuits (2/17/09), Congregation of the Christian Brothers (4/28/11):


"Dioceses and Religious Orders That Have Filed for Bankruptcy Protection," Bankruptcy Protection in the Abuse Crisis, bishopaccountability.org

 1. Archdiocese of Portland OR (filed 7/6/04)
 2. Diocese of Tucson AZ (9/20/04)
 3. Diocese of Spokane WA (12/6/04)
 4. Diocese of Davenport IA (10/10/06)
 5. Diocese of San Diego CA (2/27/07)
 6. Diocese of Fairbanks AK (3/1/08)
 a. Oregon Province of the Jesuits (2/17/09)
 7. Diocese of Wilmington DE and MD (10/18/09)

 8. Archdiocese of Milwaukee WI (1/4/11)
 b. Congregation of the Christian Brothers (4/28/11)
 9. Diocese of Gallup NM (11/12/13)
10. Diocese of Stockton CA (1/15/14)
11. Diocese of Helena MT (1/31/14)
12. Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis MN (1/16/15)"


====================
.....................................
=============================


In July 30, 2013, "Spiritually Bankrupt," Dan Rather reports US Catholic Churches routinely hide assets and file bankruptcy in pedophilia cases. Attorney involved said Catholic Church "has so much money; you couldn't really bankrupt them if you wanted to:"...


"HIGHLIGHT: The Catholic Church faces hundreds of lawsuits in the wake of the sex abuse scandal. Dioceses across the country have filed for bankruptcy, but our investigation suggests the church has hid considerable assets to avoid paying damages to victims....

RATHER (Voiceover): An investigation into how the church is shielding its wealth to avoid paying damages....

SPIRITUALLY BANKRUPT:

RATHER (On camera): Good evening from New York. The Roman Catholic Church is one of the world's wealthiest institutions -- and one of the most secretive. No one knows for sure the extent of the church's vast riches. But that secrecy is now being tested by the ever-widening priest abuse scandal.

In recent years, revelations have surfaced that hundreds of priests had sexually abused children. And bishops had failed to report them. Across the United States, priest abuse victims-now adults-- are lining up to sue their diocese for damages. But the church is going to extraordinary lengths to protect its assets, with a strategy that is spreading from church to church, diocese to diocese, across the nation. And that strategy is...bankruptcy.

Dioceses are claiming, time and again, that they are broke, not able to pay the victims who were molested as children. And that's not all attorneys for abuse victims have found the dioceses that claim to be broke are anything but. In fact, wealthy churches, they say, are moving money, hiding cash and not reporting millions in assets... anything to avoid paying damages to the victims.

RATHER (Voiceover): The Vatican...it's the seat of untold power, wealth and influence. Vatican City may be the smallest nation on earth, but its reach stretches across the globe, to thousands of parishes, charities and schools, and a billion Catholic faithful.

But the sex abuse scandal has shaken the Vatican's very foundation. And it has cast a long shadow over the short tenure of the church's current leader, Pope Benedict the sixteenth.

In early June, the Pope called thousands of clergy from around the world to the Vatican to celebrate the end of what he had declared the year of priests. But there was little to celebrate. New allegations of priest child abuse had just surfaced in some of the world's most Catholic countries. And the media - and much of the catholic world - was focused on how the pope would address this ever- expanding scandal.

RADIO BROADCAST: ...allegations of hundreds of new cases of child sex abuse...

RATHER (Voiceover): Pope Benedict finally answered that question on the last day of the gathering. He issued his first apology from St. Peter's Square, and promised to change the way the church handled abuse allegations. But for many, his vows were too little too late.

JOHN MANLY: They operate in a way that you would expect Bernard Madoff to operate, not how you would expect Christ to operate.

RATHER (Voiceover): Meet John Manly. From this nondescript office building, the southern California lawyer has been fighting a pitched battle with one of the largest institutions in the western world.

RATHER: Well, how did you get into taking on the Catholic Church?

MANLY: In a lotta ways, I think I'm the last person that should be doin' this. I was raised Catholic. I had a -- I went to Catholic school my whole life. I went to Catholic military school. I went to a Catholic high school and a year of Catholic college. I had a Jesuit spiritual director. I considered the priesthood myself. And I'm not a -- I certainly was not a paragon of virtue but I tried really hard and I believed it deeply.

RATHER (Voiceover): But his relationship with the church took a sharp turn more than 10 years ago, when a priest abuse victim sought his help. The victim would be the first of many.

MANLY: In the last 12 years, I've met and represented hundreds of people from Alaska to New York to Delaware and southern California, all of whom tell the same story, that they were raped and/or abused-- in the most violent and egregious way possible as a child. And that when the church learned of it, they did nothing.

RATHER (Voiceover): Manly found that while the church leadership was promising to make peace with the victims, in court and behind the scenes, it was doing just the opposite.

MANLY: When the church defends these cases, they don't defend it in a way that's consistent with their own theology and beliefs. They defend it in a way where the victim is under attack, the family is under attack and all the values that they say they believe in really go out the window.

RATHER (Voiceover): Take the case of San Diego, down the interstate from Manly's Newport Beach office. It's a diocese with about 100 parishes, a million Catholics and one of the worst records in the country of sexual abuse by priests.

The depth of the problem became clear in 2003, when the state of California briefly waived its statute of limitations on cases of sex abuse. The court system was hit with an onslaught of lawsuits filed by victims who had been too afraid, too ashamed, or discouraged by church officials to speak up as children. Church brass responded with drastic action: in 2007, San Diego became the fifth diocese in the United States to file for bankruptcy in the wake of the abuse scandal.

RATHER: Well now, take me through what happened with the San Diego Diocese when they filed for bankruptcy.

MANLY: Sure, the San Diego-- had about a 160 claims-- involving various priests ranging from the late '50s through the 2000's. They litigated the case in state court-- challenged the statute, deposed the victims, and essentially, on the eve of the first trial, filed for bankruptcy.

RATHER: Which goes to federal court.

MANLY: Which goes to federal bankruptcy court. And what happened is at the first hearing it became very clear that they were minimizing their assets.

RATHER (Voiceover): According to Manly, the diocese specifically hid assets so they wouldn't be exposed to future damage payouts to victims.

Under bankruptcy law, the debtors -- in this case the diocese -- are required to provide the court a complete list of everything they own, and how much the property is worth.

MANLY: The diocese owned, probably at the time, several billion dollars worth of real property. And they listed their property in the bankruptcy schedules as being worth the book value, in other words, what they paid for it. Well, the diocese has been around since the-- the 1800's. So, you had-- a building listed that was worth five million dollars, and they would list it for $150-thousand which is what they paid for it originally.

RATHER (Voiceover): But that was just the start of it. There were millions of dollars worth of properties simply missing from the official list of assets the church had presented the court -- everything from public parking lots to commercial buildings to open land -- some investment properties that had nothing to do with the church's religious operations. The diocese later claimed that these missing properties were separately owned by its parishes, and should be exempt from liability. But for many, this didn't fly. Plaintiffs lawyers said only the diocese -- not its parishes -- holds the authority to sell parish properties. And they say the diocese could have -- should have -- done just that to raise enough money to avoid bankruptcy.

But of all these missing assets, the most notable was this 14-acre bluff-top lot, off a busy thoroughfare, with wide ocean views.

RATHER: It's beautiful up here.

PATRICK WALL: Oh, it's gorgeous.

RATHER (Voiceover): Patrick Wall, who works with attorney John Manly, brought us to see the lot, where construction is underway on more than 500 condominiums.

RATHER: Well, tell us where we are and why it's important for us to be here?

WALL: We're across the street from the University of San Diego owned by the diocese, and this used to be the high school, the University of San Diego high school owned by the diocese
and run by the diocese as well. This particular property was one of those "oops" in their filing of bankruptcy -- "oops" meaning that when they went ahead and filed bankruptcy they forgot that they owned this and they forgot that they needed to include that.

RATHER: As one of their assets?

WALL: -- as one of their major assets in this filing.
RATHER: When you say they forgot, is that or is it not they "forgot" in quotation marks?

WALL: They forgot, in quotations marks. I like to make the joke that you know, Grandma McDonough down at the chancellor's office, when she was putting together the bankruptcy filing she just forgot to include it -- it was just a mishap.

RATHER (Voiceover): Actually, diocese lawyers first claimed the property was owned by a separate church corporation. Then, shortly after, said the omission had been a quote-"oversight."
Patrick Wall says the church's behavior was typical of an institution with a history of cover ups -- first, sex abuse by priests, now, church money. And this is coming from someone who should know. Wall is a former Benedictine monk and for a while, held the unenviable task of serving as, what he calls, a priest abuse "fixer." His job was keeping cases of sex abuse in his diocese below the radar.

WALL: At first, I was a loyal solider. I was a loyal priest, a company man. I thought these were complete anomalies; it was really not in -- in my worldview that we had a number of guys who were in ministry, ordained, sexually abusing kids for decades and then as I came to find out for centuries and for millennia. And at that point at the age of 33, after my 5th assignment, after numerous cases, and after some soul searching I had to leave.

RATHER (Voiceover): Wall eventually joined up with Manly, working as an expert in Catholic law, known as canon, and providing an insight into the secret and arcane inner workings of the Roman Catholic Church.

RATHER: Well, have you seen evidence that parishes, dioceses, are hiding money?

WALL: Oh yeah, even in the middle of the bankruptcy.

RATHER: Well you can't do it in the middle of a bankruptcy.

WALL: Well, you're not supposed to do it. You -- they do it, they absolutely will move money. They will create corporations, and they'll -- they'll do all kinds of things if the -- the court doesn't come down on them, and that's why we've had, a couple very interesting bankruptcies where the court has slammed the church for basically fraudulently filing a bankruptcy, even though they have the assets to pay the survivors.

RATHER: Has that actually happened?

WALL: Yeah, here in San Diego.

RATHER (Voiceover): Which brings us back to this hilltop property. While the diocese was claiming in court that it did not own the lot, it also was in the process of selling it to a developer -- and for quite a bit of money. $65 million, to be exact.

ERIC VAN WECHEL, SAN DIEGO DEVELOPER: We're gonna circle around the front. This is as if you're viewing the project from Linda Vista Road.

RATHER (Voiceover): This San Diego public planning board meeting about this very property took place just a few weeks after the diocese had filed for bankruptcy.

DIANE MURBACH, PROJECT MANAGER: ...a proposed 2.2 acre public park.

RATHER (Voiceover): It was well-attended and discussion dragged on for nearly two hours.

COMMISSIONER DENNIS OTSUJI: I can probably get you -- give you a lot of details on it but, basically, I'm gonna be supporting this project.

RATHER (Voiceover): But there was one real estate developer who had a particular interest in the sale.

DON MACLEAN: The reason I knew about that site is because I am a developer and in the development community that site was being offered to developers as a -- as a land sell for development of you know, condominiums or apartments.

RATHER (Voiceover): That's Don MacLean who lives in the hills outside San Diego.

RATHER: Were you born in California?

MACLEAN: I was, in San Diego.

RATHER (Voiceover): As a builder, he keeps a keen eye on big properties that hit the market, like the $65 million lot. But it was something much more personal that grabbed his attention in this case. Maclean is also a priest abuse victim. He was molested by two priests when he was a 10- year-old altar boy, and was among the dozens of victims who sued the church when the statute of limitations was lifted....

RATHER (Voiceover): When Maclean heard about the 14- acre property missing from the church's schedule of assets, he was serving on the creditors' committee -- a group routinely appointed by the court to keep those filing for bankruptcy honest in their claims.

RATHER: When the diocese declared bankruptcy, what was your reaction?

MACLEAN: I felt like uh -- I felt like we were being victimized all over again.

RATHER: Well, let me get this straight, you looked at this and said, "Well, I know the church has this asset."

MACLEAN: Mm-hmm.

RATHER: -Which is where their high school was but it's now being made available for development-

MACLEAN: Right.

RATHER: --a mall, condominiums or something and you said, "Well, it's not in there."

MACLEAN: It's not on the schedule. And -- and so it --it piqued the question in me, and I'm like why isn't it on the schedule?

MANLY: If you or I did what the Diocese of San Diego did in that bankruptcy, we'd be charged with bankruptcy fraud, and we'd probably be in prison. The whole strategy here of the church is 1) minimize the assets, 2) get rid of the plaintiffs, and 3) do-- most importantly, from their standpoint, deny people access to the documents that will show what we did.

RATHER (Voiceover): Again, diocese officials claimed the lot had been owned by a separate church corporation, not the diocese itself. But the federal bankruptcy judge handling the case, Louise Decarl Adler, wasn't amused. She hired a forensic accountant -- a former special agent with the FBI -- to see if the church had failed to disclose other assets.
And what that investigator found was quite interesting: in this report, he uses the word "byzantine" to describe accounting practices that would make a CPA's head spin -- assets scattered across a tangle of more than 900 parish bank accounts and another several hundred separate diocese accounts.

MANLY: There was cash that was taken from parishes and hidden. And what happened in San Diego through the bankruptcy process is it was discovered that there was a systemic effort by the bishop and the diocese to minimize or hide its assets, so much so that the judge threatened to throw out the diocese lawyer and dismiss the bankruptcy.

RATHER (Voiceover): The investigator also found evidence that some parishes were deliberately trying to hide money from creditors.|
One of the more shocking and least sophisticated cases of asset hiding occurred, according to a court report, in Calexico, California. This quiet border town is about a two-hour drive southeast of San Diego, but still part of the diocese.
According to the investigator's report, Rev. Gerardo Fernandez, pastor of Our Lady of Guadalupe Church, attempted to stash $40-thousand of church money in a parish safe just before the diocese declared bankruptcy.
We wanted to give Rev. Fernandez an opportunity to explain why he withdrew so much money just days before the bankruptcy filing. Our producer/reporter Andrew Glazer caught up with him after a recent mass. Fernandez told us he speaks English, but insisted on conducting the interview in Spanish.

ANDREW GLAZER (Translated from Spanish): Excuse me, but the investigator's report says that a few days before Chapter 11, you took out $40-thousand from various banks that belonged to the church and you put it in that safe. Can you explain this?

REV. GERARDO FERNANDEZ (Translated from Spanish): I would rather not talk about this and want to talk about it with those who are in the diocese with me, okay.

GLAZER (Translated from Spanish): But you do not have any comment on the report by the judge who said that you took out $40-thousand.

FERNANDEZ (Translated from Spanish): No, no. I think it was all a misunderstanding that's all, because everything is cleared --- the finances within the parish and with the diocese. Everything is cleared.

RATHER (Voiceover) Not according to the independent report prepared for the judge. It says pastor Fernandez only returned the money to the parish bank account after he realized he had been caught.
The investigator's report detailed other similar cases that many saw as an orchestrated pattern: like the pastor of this parish, who allegedly stashed nearly $300-thousand in a parish safe shortly before the bankruptcy filing. Or this parish, which sent $70-thousand to a church in Colombia.
We called the San Diego Diocese for comment, but its spokesman declined.
In an emailed statement, he wrote, "The Diocese of San Diego does not grant media interviews or respond to inquiries regarding victims of abuse and/or legal matters..." unquote.

MACLEAN: You know one of the comments that came from one of the bankruptcy attorneys is that - he works with a lot of bankruptcies - said, "These guys make Enron look like altar boys." Pardon the pun.

RATHER: He said that?

MCLEAN: He did.

RATHER: Said it makes Enron look like altar boys?

MCLEAN: The meaning of that statement was these guys were so over the top in trying to hide assets that you know when you compared them to the guys from the Enron bankruptcy and there was -- they weren't even on the same page.

RATHER (Voiceover): It was only when it became clear that Judge Adler was about to throw out the bankruptcy claim that the diocese agreed to a nearly $200 million settlement with victims.
But the bad will between the court and the diocese didn't stop there. Just before appearing before Judge Adler to announce the settlement, the diocese sent out this fundraising request. A letter signed by Bishop Robert Brom seeking donations from parishioners to help the diocese stay afloat after the settlement.
Judge Adler, a Catholic herself, happened to receive one of the letters from her former parish. Knowing the diocese could easily raise money by selling some of its vast number of properties, Judge Adler made her feelings quite clear.
...................
RATHER (On camera): The judge fired a parting shot at the diocese. She took church officials to task for being quote-"disingenuous" in how they disclosed diocese finances to parishioners. The judge's strong rebuke sent a loud message throughout the nation's church hierarchy.

MANLY: You heard all this stuff about, "This is a financial disaster, and we're gonna have to close schools, parishes, soup kitchens-- you know, people are gonna be on the street." They settled the cases, and none of that happened. And what il-- what that's illustrative of is they're just not tellin' the truth. This is an institution that is so cash heavy, and has so much money; you couldn't really bankrupt them if you wanted to. This is about minimizing exposure, and controlling information, nothing else.

RATHER (On camera): John Manly says the San Diego Diocese wasn't unique in using bankruptcy to avoid selling off valuable real estate holdings. Since 2004, six other dioceses facing sex abuse lawsuits have also filed for bankruptcy -- Portland, Oregon; Fairbanks, Alaska; Spokane, Washington; Tucson, Arizona; Davenport, Iowa and Wilmington, Delaware. That part of our investigation, when we return.

(BREAK)

RATHER (Voiceover): Davenport, Iowa. Far from the sandy beaches and rolling hills of southern California but the Roman Catholic Diocese here seemed to be reading from the same playbook as their brethren in San Diego. The Davenport Diocese is much smaller -- about 100-thousand Catholics live spread out over several counties. But like San Diego, Davenport also was hit particularly hard by predator priests. According to the web site, bishopaccountability.org, which tracks priest abuse allegations nationwide, more than 30 accused perpetrators preyed on children in Davenport. Between 2004 and 2006, the diocese wound up paying more than $10 million in damages to victims.

EXCERPT FROM WQAD LOCAL NEWS REPORT:

VANESSA VAN HYFTE: It was a landmark case. A victim of clergy abuse, Mike Uhde, sued the Davenport Diocese and won - one and a half million dollars. That was three weeks ago. Today the diocese says it doesn't have the money.

RATHER (Voiceover): On October 10, 2006, the diocese filed for bankruptcy protection. The filing froze more than 20 other cases from going forward in state court.

EXCERPT FROM WQAD LOCAL NEWS REPORT:

VAN HYFTE: Uhde says his case was never about the money, it was all about the truth, and in that respect, he says, he lost.

MICHAEL UHDE, PRIEST ABUSE VICTIM: There are people still running the diocese that - that made these decisions that they would rather protect the secrets and the hierarchy than the victims.

RATHER (Voiceover): Lawyers for abuse victims say this bankruptcy filing, like the others, was in bad faith. They say the diocese had plenty of assets -- and was in fact making an effort in the days leading up to the filing to jettison money instead of allowing it to fall into the hands of victims.
The allegation was based on this document: the so-called "statement of financial affairs," -- a standard form filled out by companies declaring bankruptcy that details spending in the weeks leading up to the Chapter 11 filing.
Our examination of the records reveals the diocese did, in fact, seem to be spending quite a lot of money -- especially, on October 9, 2006 -- the exact day before it filed for Chapter 11. According to the records, the diocese on that day went on a more than $150-thousand spending spree -- spending that included a sudden bout of generosity: $50- thousand for an unnamed church in Latin America. $1000 for a parish here, $750 for a parish there, $663 to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops for 50 copies of the catechism. Attorney John Manly, who was not involved in the Davenport case, says the church regularly finds ways to exploit federal bankruptcy law.

MANLY: Chapter 11 was not designed to protect organizations who've engaged in criminal conduct, or basically, protecting criminal conduct, specifically child rape. It was designed to give companies who make bad business decisions a new start. Here, what you have is, they're using the federal bankruptcy statutes to essentially shield themselves from liability of current victims, but worse, getting a discharge to prevent anybody who comes in later from getting any type of recovery. Anyone who believes the Catholic church is really bran-- bankrupt-- needs to get a gut check and a mind check because they're not bankrupt.

RATHER (Voiceover): But of the more than $400- thousand of payments challenged by victims' lawyers, a few stood out. One involved advanced payments to seminaries for the education of diocese priests, a $20- thousand payment to a seminary in Missouri the day before the bankruptcy, and another $118-thousand to another seminary in Illinois just a few weeks earlier. What made these payments unusual is that according to court papers, it was the first time the diocese had paid tuition to seminaries before even receiving a bill. This memo to the University of St. Mary of the Lake refers to a Davenport Diocese official who quote "wanted an invoice ASAP" for the tuition of five seminarians And they got it. And then there was the curious case of the pre-paid funeral -- on August 16, 2006 -- a few weeks before the bankruptcy filing -- the diocese spent almost $20-thousand on the funeral for its very-much alive Bishop William Franklin. In a statement, a spokesman for the diocese told us that, quote, "... Expenses paid before the bankruptcy were part of normal business." Unquote. The Diocese of Davenport denied doing anything wrong. But in December 2007, the diocese reached a $37 million settlement with victims.

BISHOP W. FRANCIS MALOOLY: The decision to file for Chapter 11 reorganization was a painful one and one that I had hoped I would never have to make.

RATHER (Voiceover): In 2009, the Diocese of Wilmington, Delaware became the latest to file for bankruptcy after more than 130 sex abuse lawsuits were filed. Delaware, like California, briefly lifted its statute of limitations to allow long-silent victims to seek justice.

MALOOLY (At press conference): This is a moral obligation on our part. Our equally significant moral obligation is to continue the charitable, educational, and spiritual missions of this diocese.

RATHER (Voiceover): But again, the victims had to wait for their day in court, as bankruptcy proceedings began.

LAWYER: This sham filing is the latest sad chapter in the diocese's decades long cover-up.

MALOOLY (At press conference): The advantage with this is it has a neutral party trying to decide how to fairly take care of our claimants and our creditors.

JIM HOLMAN: Seeing the church, which deals with the sexual abuse crisis in many ways like a corporation would deal with a-- a slip and fall outside of the corporate headquarters, is really appalling. When you see it from the inside, it's, it's, it's a true nightmare.

RATHER (Voiceover): Jim Holman knows what he's talking about. He's an established bankruptcy attorney at a prominent Philadelphia law firm but he's also a victim of sex abuse, molested as a Catholic school student in Wilmington. And he says the church has an obligation to behave differently.

HOLMAN: I know what legal strategy is. I know what the typical business organization needs to do in order to get through a crisis situation, or a tough time or a you know, mass liability. But in this case, when you're talking about an institution that professes to stand for something else, it just doesn't work.

RATHER (Voiceover): Attorney John Manly is representing Holman and other victims who sued the Wilmington Diocese.

MANLY: The Diocese of Wilmington has spent almost five million dollars according to its own testimony as of about a year ago to defend itself in these cases. And-- you know, the great irony there if they'd just done the right thing when these cases first came forward, in some instances, 30 years ago, they wouldn't have to spend anything.

RATHER (Voiceover): Manly says an exchange he had with a diocese official early in the bankruptcy made it clear that the church cared more about protecting its money than making amends with victims. At a meeting at this Wilmington hotel, where cameras were not allowed, Manly squared off against the church.

RATHER: From the official transcript, read what happened in that room.

MANLY: Sure.

MANLY (In audio recording): Monsignor, can you tell me what the net worth of the Diocese of Wilmington is please?

REVEREND MONSIGNOR J. THOMAS CINI, VICAR GENERAL FOR ADMINISTRATION, DIOCESE OF WILMINGTON (In audio recording): Joe, you want me to...?

MANLY (In audio recording): No, Monsignor, I'm asking you, sir.

CINI (In audio recording): The net worth?

MANLY (In audio recording): Yeah, the net worth of the diocese.

CINI (In audio recording): I think our, our, our petition says it's between fifty and a hundred million dollars.

MANLY (In audio recording): Okay. So your sworn testimony here today is that net worth of the Diocese of Wilmington is 50 to $100 million. Is that correct? MONSIGNOR CINI (In audio recording): Yes.

RATHER (Voiceover): The monsignor refused to provide a more specific estimate of the diocese's wealth, so Manly moved on to the diocese's chief financial officer.

JOSEPH CORSINI, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF THE DIOCESE OF WILMINGTON (In audio recording): You're, you're asking a very complicated question.

MANLY (In audio recording): No, I'm asking the CFO of the Diocese of Wilmington what your net worth is. Certainly you can answer that. Go ahead.

DORSEY, DIOCESE LAWYER, (In audio recording): You can answer any way you like, Mr. Corsini.

CORSINI (In audio recording): Net worth is the difference between assets and liabilities.

MANLY (In audio recording): That's right.

MANLY (In interview): And the room was packed by people who had been raped as - as kids watching this. And he looked out in the audience, and he said,

CORSINI (In audio recording): I see a roomful of liabilities, so I don't know how to estimate how much that is.

MANLY (In audio recording): You see a roomful of liabilities, is that how you see these folks?

CORSINI (In audio recording): No, I apologize for that statement. That was, that was inappropriate.

MANLY (In interview): "I have a roomful of liabilities here, how do I value that?" And I think for-- you know, and-- and-- you know, a few minutes later, he apologized, but I think for me, it was a window into the soul of the hierarchy. Because that's how they think about these kids.

RATHER (Voiceover): Jim Holman, like other victims in the room, was surprised and disappointed by the off-hand remark.

HOLMAN: It's an understandable reaction if you're dealing with a widget factory. It's not an understandable attitude when you're dealing with this kind of-- I would say really civic wound. It's not just the victims, it's the entire community. I think if, instead, the move had been to go to the people of the church and say, "We've done wrong in this diocese and we need your help so that we can make things better," it could've changed the entire tone of this.

RATHER (Voiceover): Around this same time, the diocese filed a motion in court that angered victims even further: the diocese asked permission to keep paying pensions to six confirmed pedophile priests. The diocese said the priests were old and poor, and that it was the church's duty to take care of them.

RATHER: On the one hand, it seems the compassionate, if you will, Christian thing to do. On the other hand, they're paying them pension money-- and resisting paying victims money.

MANLY: Yeah. I gotta tell you, for-- for a survivor who frequently-- who are destitute, because of what happened to 'em, to hear that their perpetrator is being paid by the diocese, and getting three squares a day, living in a nice apartment, and having no financial worries, that-- that's just hard to reconcile.

RATHER (Voiceover): The diocese eventually withdrew its motion. But that was just the beginning of what turned out to be a contentious bankruptcy trial. Manly says that, like San Diego and Davenport, the Diocese of Wilmington was trying to minimize its assets -- hide their true wealth.

MANLY: They didn't list their real property at its actual value. They listed it at book value. And I think if you asked them if they trying to minimize their assets, they'll say no, but you have a diocese that owns-- and controls dozens of parishes that says they own three pieces of property. It doesn't pass the sniff test.

RATHER (Voiceover): Manly is referring to one of the main sticking points in the trial: what exactly does the diocese own? The Diocese of Wilmington has argued that each of its parishes, schools, charities and other entities have completely separate finances from the dioceses. Each of them is in fact registered as a separate corporation. But canon law expert Patrick Wall says the diocese ultimately has control of all church money within its boundaries and that claiming otherwise is simply a legal maneuver to minimize the pool of assets exposed to abuse litigation.

WALL: Yeah, they will create its own different parish corporations and then the pastors will go and take all the cash that's in the parish and move it into the new corporation. And so when the filing happens there's no cash in any of the parishes. It's in a separate corporation, without the same name.

RATHER (Voiceover): Wall says they're separate in name only. Corporations have boards of directors, and if you look at who's on the board of directors at most of the different church entities - the parishes, schools, cemeteries, and so forth, it's the same cast of characters: the bishop of the diocese, the vicar and the parish priest.

RATHER: And what you've laid out here, correct me if I'm wrong as we go along here, that while the church officials argue that these are independent and autonomous corporations, that the board of directors -- how do I say this gently, that the fix is in, that 3 of the 5 on the board of directors, they are -- what'd you say the archbishop?

WALL: The vicar general.

RATHER: Vicar general.

WALL: And then pastor that the vic-- that the archbishop appoints.

RATHER: So in every instance, if it comes down to it, 3 of the 5 votes carries.

WALL: Always.

RATHER (Voiceover): Again, our repeated requests for an interview with the Diocese of Wilmington were declined. Our investigation found that this technique for protecting assets has caught on. While Wilmington has had this financial structure for quite some time, we found that since the start of the church abuse scandal, more than two-dozen other dioceses across the country have quietly restructured to form separate parish corporations. While corporate filings are public documents, we found in reporting this story that several dioceses weren't eager to discuss their financial structure. Several refused to comment, and the Diocese of Orlando posted this message on its web site warning church personnel to avoid talking to us.

TEXT ON SCREEN [of Diocese of Orlando]: It has come to our attention that a researcher and/or reporter of Dan Rather Reports is contacting parishes throughout the country requesting financial and organizational information for a story Dan Rather Reports is pursuing on child sexual abuse and prevention. Please refer any such individual to the Office of Communication.

RATHER (Voiceover): Wall says this divided corporate- style structure has an added benefit for the diocese. By having assets scattered across different corporations, it makes it nearly impossible for creditors to get a clear tally.

RATHER: Well, rightly or wrong this kind of maneuvering is gonna strike a lot of people as a fairly sophisticated version of the old shell game.

WALL: Yeah.

RATHER: Too strong?

WALL: No. That's exactly what happened, it's -- it's really that simple. It's simply a shell game the diocese will engage in order to protect its assets.

RATHER (Voiceover): The Diocese of Wilmington certainly wouldn't call it a shell game, but in 2007, the diocese had its various church entities form statutory trusts to even further protect them from liability. In the bankruptcy case, the diocese acknowledged the creation of these trusts was motivated by concerns over the number of sex abuse lawsuits filed in state court. The question that has loomed over this entire process is, what role, if any, has the hierarchy of the church played? More specifically, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops --the official leadership body of the Roman Catholic Church in this country whose members answer directly to the pope. Attempts by victims to hold the Vatican and the Pope accountable haven't gone far -- the United States recognizes the Vatican as its own nation, and thus its leadership has the benefit of sovereign immunity status.


RATHER: Have you found any credible evidence, that they're getting advice, counsel, instructions, from higher ups in the church hierarchy?


MANLY: Oh, sure. This-- this strategy, we believe, was developed out of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops, specifically the General Counsel's Office. You can't file bankruptcy, as a diocese, without permission from the Holy See. The idea that the bishop makes this decision on his own is nonsensical. It's all approved from Rome, all the way down.

RATHER (Voiceover): He says finding a paper trail connecting the dioceses to the church hierarchy is almost impossible -- the church famously guards its secrets. But testimony by the Wilmington Diocese's chief financial officer in the bankruptcy litigation reveals diocese lawyers had gotten some guidance from higher up -- the Conference of Catholic Bishops. We tried to reach the Conference of Catholic Bishops by telephone and email, but none of our messages were returned.


RATHER: What about the argument-- of the Central Church, the Vatican and, for that matter, the pope.

MANLY: Uh-huh (AFFIRMATIVE).

RATHER: In-- in essence, saying, "Listen, if we don't defend ourselves with the best legal tools and maneuvers at hand, you're talking about destroying the-- the Holy Roman Catholic Church on a worldwide basis." And their argument goes, "You do that, we won't be able to help orphans, widows, poor children, in places like Sudan and-- it-- just destroy the church., and that's why we have to fight with every means at our disposal."
......

MANLY: See, the problem with that is, is that's not what they teach. I was taught, growin' up, and I had some very good priests as teachers, that the church isn't a building, it's not the Vatican, it's not a gold chalice, it's not an expensive piece of art. It's the faith. Nobody wants to kill the Catholic Church, I don't. But there's an unwillingness and a hubris and an arrogance to their defense. And it's -- it-- and-- and they're really not worried about the church surviving. What they're worried about is the hierarchical and patriarchal system that has imposed horrible evil on children surviving. That's what they're trying to protect. And the pope has direct responsibility for this. He was in charge, over the last 25 years, he's the one who was supposed to monitor priests, and pull 'em out of ministry. And he did not a damn thing to protect kids. And that's a shame.
.........

RATHER (On camera): It's important to note that lawyers representing both the church and victims have made good money in these disputes. And so has at least one public relations firm. After filing for bankruptcy, the Diocese of Wilmington retained Los Angeles-based Sitrick and Company for $100- thousand. The firm specializes in quote "crisis management" -- and its clients have included embattled heiress Paris Hilton, convicted dog fighting quarterback Michael Vick, and the Los Angeles Archdiocese."

[End of report]

......................................

Per above 2013 report, US Catholic Churches can't file bankruptcy without Vatican permission:

"MANLY: Oh, sure. This-- this strategy, we believe, was developed out of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops, specifically the General Counsel's Office. You can't file bankruptcy, as a diocese, without permission from the Holy See. The idea that the bishop makes this decision on his own is nonsensical. It's all approved from Rome, all the way down."
.......

Citation for Pope Francis being a Jesuit:

3/13/2013, "Pope Francis I: First Jesuit Pope Shatters Centuries Of Mistrust," IBTimes, Alberto Riva

= ===========================

...........................................
6/27/15, "Pope Francis recruits Naomi Klein in climate change battle," UK Guardian, Rosie Scammell 

..................................
 ======================

At 2014 UN speech in Rome Pope Francis says earned wages must be taken from workers "by the state" and redistributed. Ban Ki-Moon invites Francis to speak at UN:

5/9/2014, "Pope urges 'legitimate redistribution' of wealth," AP, Nicole Winfield 

"Pope Francis called Friday for governments to redistribute wealth and benefits to the poor in a new spirit of generosity to help curb the "economy of exclusion" that is taking hold today.

Francis made the appeal during a speech to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and the heads of major U.N. agencies who met in Rome this week."...



==========================
............................................ 

In 2011 Vatican's morally deranged Turkson calls for global governing authority such as the UN to enact "a fair distribution of world wealth:"

10/24/2011, "Towards Reforming Financial and Monetary Systems in the Context of Global Public Authority," Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, The Vatican, Peter K.A. Cardinal Turkson, President, Bishop Mario Toso, Secretary

"With due respect for the competent civil and political authorities, the Council hereby offers and shares its reflection: Towards reforming the international financial and monetary systems in the context of global public authority....

The G20 leaders themselves said in the Statement they adopted in Pittsburgh in 2009: “The economic crisis demonstrates the importance of ushering in a new era of sustainable global economic activity grounded in responsibility” (3)....   

We hope that world leaders and all people of good will find this reflection helpful."...
............................ 
2nd to last paragraph in subhead 3. "An Authority over Globalization:"  

"A long road still needs to be travelled before arriving at the creation of a public Authority with universal jurisdiction. It would seem logical for the reform process to proceed with the United Nattions as its reference because of the worldwide scope of the UN’s responsibilities, its ability to bring together the nations of the world, and the diversity of its tasks and those of its specialized Agencies. The fruit of such reforms ought to be a greater ability to adopt policies and choices that are binding because they are aimed at achieving the common good on the local, regional and world levels. Among the policies, those regarding global social justice seem most urgent: financial and monetary policies that will not damage the weakest countries(19); and policies aimed at achieving free and stable markets and a fair distribution of world wealth, which may also derive from unprecedented forms of global fiscal solidarity, which will be dealt with later. On the way to creating a world political Authority, questions of governance (that is, a system of merely horizontal coordination without a higher authority super partes) cannot be separated from those of a shared government (that is, a system which in addition to horizontal coordination establishes a higher authority super partes) which is functional and proportionate to the gradual development of a global political society."...via Rosa Koire, Democrats Against UN Agenda 21
.........................
.................

6/15/15, Comment from Rosa Koire: "Yes, it just makes sense that the United Nations would be world authority. It "seems logical."

Rosa continues:


Perhaps the Pope, who just accepted the resignation of one of his US Archbishops over pedophilia charges and church coverups, should change the climate in the Catholic Church.  Why are there still pedophiles hiding in confessionals, orphanages, and classrooms?  Perhaps the Pope should resign so that he can take over the UN's Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals---we'd be sure that they would fail.  The Catholic Church is committed to UN Agenda 21. - See more at: http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/the-way-we-see-itour-blog#sthash.sWyGrXJ2.dpufPerhaps the Pope, who has just accepted the resignation of one of his US Archbishops over pedophilia charges and church coverups, should change the climate in the Catholic Church. Why are there still pedophiles hiding in confessionals, orphanages, and classrooms? Perhaps the Pope should resign so he can take over the UN's post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals--we'd be sure they would fail. The Catholic Church is committed to UN Agenda 21." The Vatican was one of 179 who agreed to the UN Agenda 21 Agreement in 1992.












.................

.....................