“Protestors [in Iraq] are confirming the use of snipers from buildings, targeting protesters….During the 2014 U.S. coup in Ukraine the same method was used to inflame the country.”…"There have been protests all over the south of Iraq where the majority of the people are Shia."..."Two months ago, Qays Khaz’ali said: “There’s plans to change Baghdad government...with protests erupting in October. Protests not spontaneous, but organised.”"…“Recent decisions of [Pres. of Iraq] Abdel Mahdi made him extremely unpopular with the US."…
10/6/19, “The U.S. Led Coup Attempt In Iraq May Further Weaken That Country," Moon of Alabama
“The current unrest in Iraq began a week ago after a prominent general was removed from his post: “Lieutenant General Abdul Wahab al-Saadi was the great Iraqi military hero of the war against [US, Saudi, and Qatar backed] Isis, leading the assault on Mosul which recaptured the de facto Isis capital after a nine-month siege in 2017.
But at the weekend he was suddenly removed as the commander of the Counter Terrorism Service (CTS) shock troops, the elite corps of the Iraqi armed forces, by Prime Minister Adel Abdel Mahdi. He was instead given what the general considered to be a non-job at the Defence Ministry.
Saadi has refused to accept the move against him, and described his new posting as an “insult” and a “punishment.” His effective demotion has provoked a wave of popular support for arguably Iraq’s most esteemed general, on the streets as well as on social media.”
The [Iraqi] CTS is a force that often cooperates with the U.S. military [in Iraq]. Abdul Wahab al-Saadi is a U.S. trained officer. He was suspected to be the head of an imminent overthrow of the [Iraqi] government.
For months there have been rumors of a U.S. instigated coup in Iraq:
“Republic of Sumer @Sumer_Iraq – 14:30 UTC · Oct 4, 2019
Two months ago, Qays Khaz’ali said:
There’s plans to change Baghdad government in November, with protests erupting in October. Protests not spontaneous, but organised by factions in Iraq. Mark my words.”
Qays Khaz’ali is a leader of Shia groups who twelve years ago fought against the U.S. and British invaders.
“Sharmine Narwani @snarwani – 00:34 UTC · Oct 5, 2019
Al Akhbar newspaper says the govt of #Iraq learned 3 months ago of a planned US-backed coup by military officers, to be followed by street action. Time to be skeptical about events in Iraq?”
During the last five days there have been protests all over the south of Iraq where the majority of the people are Shia. The protests escalated within a few days into shootings with over a hundred killed. In several cities party and government offices were burned and various groups hustle to take a position in the “leaderless” movement.
There are legitimate reasons for protests. The majority of the people in Iraq is younger than 20 years. The people have little chance of finding a job. The state is weak and many of its actors are corrupt. Services the state is supposed to provide don’t get delivered. Electricity and water supply is often sparse.
But those are not the reasons why the protests immediately escalated into violence:
“Liz Sly @LizSly – 22:19 UTC · Oct 4, 2019
Many Iraqi protesters are complaining of unknown snipers targeting them from rooftops, [same shock tactic US used in 2014 Ukraine, used snipers stationed in buildings such as BBC's Kiev base, as well as on "rooftops" who deliberately shot and killed both sides, both police and demonstrators, and whom witnesses described as "certainly professionals.”] and it’s possible they are aiming at both the demonstrators and the security forces. [Additional citation: Ukraine snipers deliberately shot both protesters and police].
Quote: Reporting Iraq @TFPOI · Oct 4
Protestors are confirming the use of snipers from buildings, targeting protesters approaching Tahrir Square. A young man was killed by the use of snipers. Evidence in the form of a photo can be seen. #iraq #baghdad #save_the_iraqi_people”
During the 2014 U.S. coup in Ukraine the same method was used to inflame the country.
“Al Sura @AlSuraEnglish – 15:36 UTC · Oct 5, 2019
#BREAKING – #Iraqi special forces launch search and destroy mission against unknown snipers that have killed at least 4 protesters across the capital of #Baghdad.”
The snipers are not the only sign that the protests are not genuine:
“Marc Owen Jones @marcowenjones – 5:59 UTC · Oct 4, 2019
[#Thread] 1/ This one is on #Iraq. A few people mentioned suspicious activity on Twitter and I had a look into a few hashtags. One in particular begins, “Show your support for the right of Iraq people to protest peacefully”. I have little doubt there is an influence campaign…
[…]
4/ Firstly, as you can see from the below graph, the hashtags started trending quite suddenly at 3.30pm UTC on October 2nd. However one of the first accounts to post the hashtag was the one screenshotted here > @AlshiblyRamy – who has a lot of photos of Saudi and Iraq flags…
5/ The most salient measure of inorganic activity is accounts created in a short time frame. Of the 6500 or so accounts in the sample, 1,118 were created in just 3 days – October 1st, 2nd and 3rd. That’s astounding – around 17% of the sample! #Iraq”
The protests are part of the conflict between the U.S., its Saudi proxies, and Iran.
The immediate aim is to bring down the government under Prime Minister Adel Abdel Mahdi who strove to stay neutral in the conflict between the U.S./Israel/Saudi Arabia and Iran:
“The recent decisions of Abdel Mahdi made him extremely unpopular with the US. He has declared Israel responsible for the destruction of the five warehouses of the Iraqi security forces, Hashd al-Shaabi, and the killing of one commander on the Iraqi-Syrian borders. He opened the crossing at al-Qaem between Iraq and Syria to the displeasure of the US embassy in Baghdad, whose officers expressed their discomfort to Iraqi officials. He expressed his willingness to buy the S-400 and other military hardware from Russia. Abdel Mahdi agreed with China to reconstruct essential infrastructure in exchange for oil, and gave a $284 million electricity deal to a German rather than an American company. The Iraqi Prime Minister refused to abide by US sanctions and is still buying electricity from Iran and allowing the exchange of commerce that is bringing large amounts of foreign currency and boosting the Iranian economy. And lastly, Abdel Mahdi rejected the “Deal of the Century” proposed by the US: he is trying to mediate between Iran and Saudi Arabia and therefore is showing his intention to keep away from the US objectives and policies in the Middle East.”
The violent protests in Iraq are part of a larger undeclared war against Iran.
A recent attempt to kill Major general Qassem Soleiman, the leader of Iran’s Quds force, is part of it:
“The suspects had plotted to kill Soleimani during the Ashoura religious commemorations on September 9 and 10, according to [Iran Security Chief] Taeb.
They sought to buy a property near a mosque built by Soleimani’s father in the city of Kerman, dig a tunnel underneath the site and rig it with “350 to 500 kilogrammes of explosives”, he said.
The team planned to “blow up the entire place" as soon as Soleimani entered the mosque for Shia mourning ceremony. [Iran security chief] Taeb said the suspects “went to a neighbouring country” and “large sums of money were spent to train and prepare them” to carry out the attack.”
New U.S. sanctions against Lebanese banks who allegedly support Hizbullah are likewise part of U.S./Israeli/Saudi effort to squeeze Iran and its proxies:
“The Trump administration has intensified sanctions on the Lebanese militant group and institutions linked to it to unprecedented levels, targeting lawmakers for the first time as well as a local bank that Washington claims has ties to the group.
Two U.S. officials visited Beirut in September and warned the sanctions will increase to deprive Hezbollah of its sources of income. The push is further adding to Lebanon’s severe financial and economic crisis, with Lebanese officials warning the country’s economy and banking sector can’t take the pressure.
“We have taken more actions recently against Hezbollah than in the history of our counterterrorism program,” Sigal P. Mandelker, undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence at the U.S. Treasury, said in the United Arab Emirates last month.”
Mandelker, who was born and grew up in Israel and is furthering its interest, recently announced that she will leave the [Trump] administration. This might be a sign that the pressure policy against Iran and other countries will change.
“Esfandyar Batmanghelidj @yarbatman – 18:06 UTC · Oct 2, 2019
Forget John Bolton, this may be the most enabling change in personnel if Trump wants to restart diplomacy with Iran and end “maximum pressure.” Mandelker is considered an unreasonable and dogmatic official by compliance officers worldwide.”
But for now the riots in Iraq are likely to escalate.
“Hiwa Osman @Hiwaosman – 21:16 UTC · Oct 5, 2019
Just in: Gunmen in balaclavas attacked the offices of the following TV stations in Baghdad: Dijla, NRT, Arabiya, Arabiya Hadath, Fallouja, Alghad Alaraby, Al-Sharqiya and Skynew Arabia. They ransacked the offices, destroyed their equipment and broadcast facilities. #IraqProtests”
One demand of the protesters is a [regime change] resignation of the government, another is the change of the election law to eliminate large party blocks in the parliament. Either would further weaken the country."…Posted by b on October 6, 2019 at 9:52 UTC | Permalink
........
……………………..
Among comments
………………………….
“7. The democratic system in Iraq has failed. There is no social, ideological and cultural basis for it in Iraq, as in the middle east as a whole. Additionally, to the missing cultural basis for it, there is also missing a much more homogenized society, which sees it self as more or less one.
The sectarian and tribal mindset are defining the middle east now as in the past, and likely in the future. It could only have a slight chance, if it would be a federal, decentralized country between e.g. a Shia, Sunni and Kurdish sub states.
But that won’t fly either, because no sect or minority group would want to give up claim to the areas with the oil, as no state is viable without it.
The obvious “solution” is having a strongman rule Iraq, like Assad in Syria.Or as a famous correspondent once said: The best realistically possible option for countries in the middle east is an “enlightened despot”. Like the Iraqi saw Saddam in his early days.
And as a matter of fact, many now carry pictures of Saddam on their demonstrations and riots."...Posted by: DontBelieveEitherPr. | Oct 6 2019 13:51 utc | 17”
………………………………
Added:
Image: 12/30/2018, “US flag flies in Syria’s Manbij despite pullout notice,” AFP, Delil Souleiman. What “international law” allows US to invade Syria and plant its flag on Syrian land? Syria would be completely justified in seizing US land and planting its flag there.
………………………..
Added:
For their own safety, 70+ countries hosting 800 US military bases around the world should immediately evict US personnel and close the bases. US brutally destroyed Syria for no reason and now threatens sanctions on anyone who tries to help rebuild it.
………………………………………..
Added: On top of illegally occupying one third of Syria, US thinks it’s theirs to give away:
Image, 10/6/19, Liz Sly twitter: “The last time Erdogan threatened so specifically to invade NE Syria, Trump got on the phone & promised him everything he wanted, ie to give the area [NE Syria currently illegally occupied by US] to Turkey. Now he gets another phone call with Trump -but did he get what he wanted this time around?”…….
Flag shows map of Syria with redrawn borders reflecting de facto annexation of the northeast region, a third of the country, by the US: “Fighters of Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) put an SDF flag in al-Omar oil field in Deir Al Zor, Syria March 23, 2019. (photo credit: Aboud Hamam/Reuters)” [US insists its own 2000 mile southern border remains wide open.]
............................
Added: US used snipers on "rooftops" in Kiev in 2014 because the US knows terror quickly makes a weak country beg for mercy. Snipers at hotel room windows and on rooftops deliberately shot and killed both sides:
4/14/2014, "German television report indicates Ukrainian opposition [ie, the US terrorist mafia] responsible for lethal shootings," Johannes Stern, wsws.org
"Seven weeks after the right-wing coup in Ukraine, evidence is mounting that the Western-backed [ie, US] opposition at the time was responsible for the lethal shootings in Independence Square on February 20. This was suggested by a report on the German public television programme “Monitor” last Thursday evening, and which is available online (in German).
"In its report, “Monitor” raised the question, “Did radical oppositionists end up shooting in order to produce chaos and place the blame on Yanukovitch [whom the US wanted to get rid of]?” The presented videos, interviews and sound recordings suggest precisely this!
“Monitor” presented an extract of radio traffic from alleged sharp-shooters [at first assumed to be] of the Yanukovitch regime, who were positioned on various rooftops in the centre of Kiev on February 20 [2014]....
On other videos, activists who marched along Institutska Street on February 20, can be seen being shot not only from the front, that is, from the direction of government buildings, but also from behind. Nikola, an eyewitness who is visible on several videos, confirmed, “Yes, on the 20th [February] we were shot from behind, from the Hotel Ukrayina, from the eighth or ninth floor. People were standing up there and shooting at us and we were also shot from the other direction.”
Responding to the question as to who had shot them from the Hotel Ukrayina, he answered, “I don’t know. They were soldiers, certainly professionals.”
On the day of the shootings, the Hotel Ukrayina was firmly under the control of the opposition [the US] and was heavily guarded. Numerous witnesses, journalists and oppositionists confirmed this to “Monitor”. On the morning of February 20, the opposition even introduced entry controls. Only those with a room key or identification were allowed into the hotel. The “Monitor” reporters come to the conclusion, “Therefore it would have been very difficult for a sniper to sneak in.”...
A doctor, who treated victims on both sides, confirmed this in an interview. “The injured who we treated had the same type of bullet wounds. I’m speaking about the type of bullets we took out of the bodies in operations. They were identical. I can’t say any more”, he stated.
The explosive report concurs with the intercepted telephone call
between Estonian foreign minister Urmas Paet and the foreign policy head
of the EU, Catherine Ashton, at the beginning of March. Paet also based
himself on information from doctors and stated that “the same snipers shot people on both sides.” He warned that “the conclusion that not Yanukovitch [the Russia-friendly one the US wanted out], but members of the new [US] coalition were behind the shootings is increasingly reinforced.”
Since then, the transitional [US installed, "Yats is the guy"] government in Kiev and its Western allies have desperately sought to cover up the true course of events....[given that trillions of dollars are invested in blaming Russia].
A lawyer for the victims suggested that the entire investigation was a deliberate ploy by the [US puppet] transitional government to bury their own crimes. “None of us are getting any information on the investigation”, he complained. “And if you ask me, there is one simple reason for this: it is not being investigated properly....They are covering for their own people. They are partisan as before.”"
....................
Added: Obama freely admits US engineered the 2014 Ukraine coup. Instead of the word "coup," Obama uses the term "brokered a deal to transition power:"..."Yats is the guy"
Posted on You Tube, 2/1/2015: “Obama Openly Admits ‘Brokering Power Transition’ In Ukraine"…(Obama also says Putin's "decision around Crimea" wasn't because of "some grand strategy" but because he was caught "off balance" by the Kiev coup:
Obama interview with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria
Obama: “And since Mr. Putin made this decision around Crimea and Ukraine not because of some grand strategy, but essentially because he was caught off balance by the protests in the Maidan [Kiev] and Yanukovych then fleeing after we had brokered a deal to transition power [overthrow elected government] in Ukraine.”
Above, screen shot from You Tube video
No comments:
Post a Comment