Saturday, October 12, 2019

Trump is a legitimately elected president whose ouster is being actively sought by the intelligence community. If successful, intel would have de facto veto over elections-“We’re in a permanent coup,” Matt Taibbi

.
“Trump is a legitimately elected president whose ouster is being actively sought by the intelligence community....The real problem of successfully removing Trump would be the precedent of a de facto intelligence community veto over elections.”  

10/11/19, We’re in a permanent coup,” Matt Taibbi, taibbisubstack.com 

“My discomfort in the last few years, first with Russiagate and now with Ukrainegate and impeachment, stems from the belief that the people pushing hardest for Trump’s early removal are more dangerous than Trump. Many Americans don’t see this because they’re not used to waking up in a country where you’re not sure who the president will be by nightfall. They don’t understand that this predicament is worse than having a bad president. 

The Trump presidency is the first to reveal a full-blown schism between the intelligence community and the White House. Senior figures in the CIA, NSA, FBI and other agencies made an open break from their would-be boss before Trump’s inauguration, commencing a public war of leaks that has not stopped…. 

Donald “Deep State” Trump is a legitimately elected president whose ouster is being actively sought by the intelligence community…. 

Trump, at least insofar as we know, has not used section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to monitor political rivals. He hasn’t deployed human counterintelligence “informants” to follow the likes of Hunter Biden. He hasn’t maneuvered to secure Special Counsel probes of Democrats. 

And while Donald Trump conducting foreign policy based on what he sees on Fox and Friends is troubling, it’s not in the same ballpark as CNN, MSNBC, the Washington Post and the New York Times engaging in de facto coverage partnerships with the FBI and CIA to push highly politicized, phony narratives like Russiagate. 

Trump’s tinpot Twitter threats and cancellation of White House privileges for dolts like Jim Acosta also don’t begin to compare to the danger posed by Facebook, Google, and Twitter – under pressure from the Senateorganizing with groups like the Atlantic Council to fight “fake news” in the name of preventing the “foment of discord.” 

I don’t believe most Americans have thought through what a successful campaign to oust Donald Trump would look like. Most casual news consumers can only think of it in terms of Mike Pence becoming president. The real problem would be the precedent of a de facto intelligence community veto over elections, using the lunatic spookworld brand of politics that has dominated the last three years of anti-Trump agitation.”…




...............

No comments: