12/15/14, "Study: Your all-electric car may not be so green," AP, Seth Borenstein
"People who own
all-electric cars where coal generates the power may think they are
helping the environment. But a new study finds their vehicles actually
make the air dirtier, worsening global warming.
Ethanol isn't so green, either.
.
.
"It's
kind of hard to beat gasoline" for public and environmental health,
said study co-author Julian Marshall, an engineering professor at the
University of Minnesota. "A lot of the technologies that we think of as
being clean ... are not better than gasoline."
The
key is where the source of the electricity all-electric cars. If it
comes from coal, the electric cars produce 3.6 times more soot and smog
deaths than gas, because of the pollution made in generating the
electricity, according to the study that is published Monday by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. They also are
significantly worse at heat-trapping carbon dioxide that worsens global
warming, it found.
The study examines
environmental costs for cars' entire life cycle, including where power
comes from and the environmental effects of building batteries..
"Unfortunately,
when a wire is connected to an electric vehicle at one end and a
coal-fired power plant at the other end, the environmental consequences
are worse than driving a normal gasoline-powered car," said Ken Caldeira
of the Carnegie Institution for Science, who wasn't part of the study
but praised it.
The states with the highest
percentage of electricity coming from coal, according to the Department
of Energy, are West Virginia, Wyoming, Ohio, North Dakota, and Illinois.
Still,
there's something to be said for the idea of helping foster a cleaner
technology that will be better once it is connected to a cleaner grid,
said study co-author Jason Hill, another University of Minnesota
engineering professor.
The study finds
all-electric vehicles cause 86 percent more deaths from air pollution
than do cars powered by regular gasoline. Coal produces 39 percent of
the country's electricity, according to the Department of Energy.
But
if the power supply comes from natural gas, the all-electric car
produces half as many air pollution health problems as gas-powered cars
do. And if the power comes from wind, water or wave energy, it produces
about one-quarter of the air pollution deaths.
Hybrids and diesel engines are cleaner than gas, causing fewer air pollution deaths and spewing less heat-trapping gas.
But ethanol isn't, with 80 percent more air pollution mortality, according to the study.
"If
we're using ethanol for environmental benefits, for air quality and
climate change, we're going down the wrong path," Hill said.
---
Online:
Journal: http://www.pnas.org
=====================
12/15/14, "Life cycle air quality impacts of conventional and alternative light-duty transportation in the United States," pnas.org
"Edited by Douglas J. Arent, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, and accepted by the Editorial Board November
8, 2014 (received for review April 15, 2014)"
"Abstract:"
.
"Commonly considered strategies for reducing the environmental impact of
light-duty transportation include using alternative
fuels and improving vehicle fuel economy.
We evaluate the air quality-related human health impacts of 10 such
options, including
the use of liquid biofuels, diesel, and
compressed natural gas (CNG) in internal combustion engines; the use of electricity from a range of conventional and renewable sources to power electric
vehicles (EVs); and the use of hybrid EV technology. Our approach
combines spatially, temporally, and chemically detailed
life cycle emission inventories;
comprehensive, fine-scale state-of-the-science chemical transport
modeling; and exposure,
concentration–response, and economic
health impact modeling for ozone (O3) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5). We find that powering vehicles with corn ethanol or with coal-based or “grid average” electricity increases monetized environmental health impacts by 80% or more relative to using conventional gasoline. Conversely, EVs
powered by low-emitting electricity
from natural gas, wind, water, or solar power reduce environmental
health impacts by 50% or more. Consideration of potential
climate change impacts alongside the human
health outcomes described here further reinforces the environmental
preferability
of EVs powered by low-emitting electricity relative to gasoline vehicles."
.
No comments:
Post a Comment