.
12/15/14, "Bachmann: ‘Ruling Class In Washington’ Decided US Will Have ‘Open Borders’," Daily Caller, Al Weaver
"Outgoing Rep. Michele Bachmann said Monday that her vote against the
2015 government spending bill last weekend was the “most consequential
vote” of her tenure because it funded President Barack Obama’s executive
action on immigration.
On Laura Ingraham’s radio show, Bachmann took aim at the “ruling
class in Washington,” saying that the U.S. will “not have any
sovereignty” over its borders. Bachmann also opined that with the
executive action, the president put in place an “insurance policy,”
allowing Democrats to win “every presidential contest from here on out.
“It was the most consequential vote of the eight years that I was in
the United States Congress because it contains the funding to have the
president’s illegal, unconstitutional work permits,” said the Minnesota
congresswoman.
“That not only is a constitutional crisis, it’s a rending of the
social contract between the government and the people. Because the
ruling class in Washington have just decided is that we will have open
borders, we will not have any sovereignty over our borders,” Bachmann
told Ingraham. “It is in effect the president has just put the insurance
policy in the bank so that Democrats in the future in all likelihood
win every presidential contest from here on out.”
“We heard these Republicans; very few spoke out about the merits of
this bill. Very few Senators and Congressmen talked about the
nitty-gritty in the bill,” Ingraham told Bachmann. “They only talked
about avoiding a shutdown.”"
=================
Comment: A place without a southern border isn't a country, it's just a place on a map. There's no basis for holding elections, having a military, a Commerce Dept., or an IRS. Without borders, there's no authority for taxing and distributing income. The GOP E, Wall St. Journal and others have been desperate for open borders for decades.
.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment