Mark Levin: No to Condoleezza Rice.
7/12/12, "Condoleeza Rice laments Bush rejection of Kyoto," Junk Science, Steve Milloy
"By any measure George Bush was a disaster. He botched two wars, expanded the welfare state, presided over the housing bubble and ensuing bailouts, lost Congress to the Democrats and left us with the three-headed monster of Obama-Pelosi-Reid — a calamity that America will be lucky to survive."
----------------------------------
Like Obama, Condoleezza Rice feels Americans are the problem. She uses the world stage we gave her to make the point. CO2 isn't poison, but assuming it were, US CO2 emissions have dropped steadily since at least 2006 and are going lower. Other countries' have not--despite billions spent on cap and trade and extra taxes. Rice not only lies about global warming, she encourages hate against defenseless Americans in a world dominated by terrorists. Top US politicians invite the world to view us as pigs and whipping posts. Then they ship out billions more pig US tax dollars:
9/27/2007: "US urges climate change consensus," BBC
"US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has said climate change is a real problem, and world leaders should forge a new global consensus on tackling it.
At a meeting of the top 16 polluting countries, Ms Rice said the US was "a major emitter" and was not "above the international community on the issue"."...via Climate Depot
America hasn't fallen quite far enough for people like Rice (and the entire Bush crowd) and Obama. The Goldman Sachs/CO2 endangerment crowd did just fine, no matter that Bush didn't sign Kyoto. (Clinton didn't either but the media only complained about Bush). George Bush the First institutionalized Global Warming in the US government in 1990. Included was this throw-in by Bush the First which established CO2 as a dangerous pollutant:
"Section 204:
"Promoting the conservation of forest resources which help reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere."...(scroll down, item near end)
=========================
It goes from bad to worse with globalist Condoleezza Rice. She favors the UN LOST treaty. She pushed hard to get the Muslim Brotherhood into office. This is what's meant by "open elections in Egypt:"
11/25/2010, "Mubarak snubs U.S. call for election monitors," Eli Lake, Washington Times
"The 2005 elections followed a push from the Bush administration to open authoritarian societies in the Middle East. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice spoke on June 20, 2005, at the American University in Cairo, urging Mr. Mubarak to allow for free and competitive elections.
Two years earlier, Miss Rice threatened to cut U.S. military aid to Egypt if it did not release from prison Saad Eddin Ibrahim, a pro-reform sociologist who was imprisoned for accepting Western funding."...(parags. 11 and 12)------------------------------------------
Even Soros says there isn't much difference between Obama and Romney. If you say there isn't much difference between Bush and Romney, then you can say Bush, Romney and Obama aren't too different. Soros says Romney might have to name an 'extremist' VP (presumably to placate 'crazies' in the base):
1/25/12, "George Soros on what the 2012 election means for Wall Street and why he’s a traitor to his class," Reuters
"If it’s between Obama and Romney, there isn’t all that much difference except for the crowd that they bring with them. And that’s not very encouraging on either side because Obama’s administration is a bit exhausted — a lot of the talent has left — and the Republicans would have to, or a Republican candidate would have to, bring in probably an extremist vice-president."...
Soros says an "extremist" VP might have to be added, but he already said that Romney and Obama are the same. Soros doesn't say Romney will bring an extremist crowd--obviously presidents' "crowds" match the presidents' views. The VP can be a cosmetic touch to fool the rubes and easily sent to Siberia after elections. Soros did not say Romney would bring in an extremist crowd, only that he might name such a VP candidate.
===========================
2001 began "The Lost Decade," when US politicians stole the country from the people:
10/20/11, "The lost decade," Claremont Institute, Angelo M. Codevilla
"At home, the American people are less free, less prosperous, more bitterly divided, and much less hopeful in 2011 than in 2001 because a decade of the War on Terror brought a government ever bigger and more burdensome, as well as “security” measures that impede the innocent rather than focusing on wrongdoers. Our ruling class justified its ever-larger role in America’s domestic life by redefining war as a never-ending struggle against unspecified enemies for abstract objectives, and by asserting expertise far above that of ordinary Americans."...
===========================
6/26/12, "The Incredible Shrinking Carbon Pollution Forecast - Part 2," switchboard.nrdc.org, Dan Lashof
--------------------------------------
6/29/12, "US Carbon Output Forecasts Shrink Again," American Interest, Walter Russell Mead
--------------------------------------
6/4/12, "Climate change stunner: USA leads world in CO2 cuts since 2006," Vancouver Observer, Saxifrage
-------------------------------------
6/22/12, "U.S. cuts greenhouse gases despite do-nothing Congress," CNN, Steve Hargreaves
"Even factoring in a stronger economy, forecasters see greenhouse gas emissions continuing to fall."...
-----------------------------------
4/21/12, "Why [CO2] Emissions Are Declining in the U.S. But Not in Europe," by Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, newgeography.com"As we note below in a new article for Yale360, a funny thing happened: U.S. emissions started going down in 2005 and are expected to decline further over the next decade."
------------------------------------
7/2/12, "CO2 Emissions Will Likely Fall This Year to 1991 Levels," Carpe Diem, Mark J. Perry
======================
11/23/11, "Europe's $287 billion carbon 'waste': UBS report," The Australian, by Sid Maher
"SWISS banking giant UBS says the European Union's emissions trading scheme has cost the continent's consumers $287 billion for "almost zero impact" on cutting carbon emissions."...EU CO2 trading provided "windfall profits" to participants paid for by "electricity customers.""
-------------------------------------
4/23/12, "'I made a mistake': Gaia theory scientist James Lovelock admits he was 'alarmist' about the impact of climate change," UK Daily Mail, L. Warren
===============
7/16/10, "Carbon Trading Used as Money-Laundering Front," Jakarta Globe
===========================
10/8/10, "Murder on the Carbon Express: Interpol Takes On Emissions Fraud," Mother Jones, M. Schapiro
==========================
5/6/12, "US Leads EU in CO2 Reductions," Walter Russell Mead, American Interest
=======================1/25/2009, "Global warming industry becomes too big to fail," Timothy Carney, Washington Examiner
-----------------------------------
A 2011 report noted EIA results through 2009, US CO2 emissions dropped steadily since 1999. If, hypothetically, US temperatures have been on the increase, they couldn't possibly be related to US carbon dioxide emissions:
4/14/11, "Biggest Drop in U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions," World Climate Report
"In 2009, greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. experienced their biggest drop since the U.S. Energy Information Administration began tracking them during the 1990-2009 timeframe.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment