2/18/11, "CBO: Repealing ObamaCare to reduce gross spending by $1.4 trillion over next decade," American Spectator, Philip Klein
"Repealing the new national health care law would result in gross savings of $1.4 trillion, a new report by the Congressional Budget Office finds.
During the health care debate, Democrats were hard pressed to keep up with President Obama's promise that the legislation would cost "around $900 billion." So they employed the
- gimmick of delaying the major spending provisions until 2014
to make the legislation appear cheaper within the CBO's ten-year budget window,
- then 2010 through 2019.
At the time, I calculated that this tactic deferred 98 percent of the spending to the last six years of that period. Well, now two years have passed, and the
- CBO's budget window has shifted to 2012 through 2021 -- and voliĆ --
the estimate that was $940 billion at the time of passage has suddenly gone up to $1.4 trillion. Keep in mind that this estimate still includes two years (2012 and 2013) prior to full implementation. Clearly, the actual 10-year cost of the major coverage provisions is going to be even higher --
- likely something closer to $1.8 trillion.
Of course, Democrats are going to focus on the CBO's other finding -- that repealing the health care law would add $210 billion to deficits over this period. But let's break that down. It's true that the
- law also includes $732 billion in spending cuts (primarily for Medicare).
Right now, we're engaged in a bitter debate over how to wring savings out of the federal budget so we can reduce the debt. Well, if the $732 billion in cuts had not been used to pay for a new entitlement,
- they'd still be available for deficit reduction. "
via Weasel Zippers
No comments:
Post a Comment