At Paris climate meeting 12/9/2015, John Kerry admitted utter futility of further costly US CO2 cuts: 'If all industrial nations went to zero emissions, it wouldn't be enough, not when more than 65% of world's CO2 comes from developing world.' Why didn't he promise to refund to US taxpayers the billions of their hard earned dollars they've been starved of by the US political class yearly since 1990 to allegedly assist global CO2 terror programs but which have obviously been misspent?

.
12/9/2015, John Kerry at Paris Climate Meeting: @ :26, "If all the industrial nations went down to zero emissions...Remember what I said, ALL the industrial nations went down to zero emissions, it wouldn't be enough. Not when more than 65% of the world's carbon pollution comes from the developing world."



"This is the first time such a senior government official has admitted the utter futility of American carbon dioxide emissions cuts."

12/9/2015, "Why Bother? John Kerry Admits American CO2 Cuts Would Be Pointless," Breitbart, Steve Milloy

"Secretary of State John Kerry made an astounding confession today at the COP-21 climate conference in Paris: Emissions cuts by the U.S. and other industrialized nations will make no difference to global climate, he said.

Here are Kerry’s exact words:

"The fact is that even if every American citizen biked to work, carpooled to school, used only solar panels to power their homes, if we each planted a dozen trees, if we somehow eliminated all of our domestic greenhouse gas emissions, guess what – that still wouldn’t be enough to offset the carbon pollution coming from the rest of the world.

If all the industrial nations went down to zero emissions –- remember what I just said, all the industrial emissions went down to zero emissions -– it wouldn’t be enough, not when more than 65% of the world’s carbon pollution comes from the developing world."

This is the first time such a senior government official has admitted the utter futility of American carbon dioxide emissions cuts. That’s a consequential admission even if you believe the claims of climate alarmists about the danger of emissions....

Kerry’s clear, frank and even emphasized admission is simply astounding. The admission should have legal as well as political consequences."...
.....................

George Bush #1 in 1990 via his USGCRP converted US taxpayers into global slaves of the new global climate science industry. Naturally, a key part of this new industry has been decades of jet setting to global climate fests.  

The "global climate danger industry" was established in 1990 by George Bush #1 (Public law 101-606) and mandated that precious US taxpayer dollars that might otherwise go to the poor and needy or to infrastructure would flow to "climate" cronies. George Bush #1 never gets credit he deserves for forcing Americans to starve themselves to death by financing this imaginary industry. His 1990 Executive mandate, Global Change Research Act (also known as USGCRP) declared general global environmental crises, ordered 13 federal agencies to attend to them, and bound US taxpayers to finance them in perpetuity. The industry had been built on and thrives to this day via constant demonization of and incitement of hatred against innocent Americans.

"Abstract:  Scientific disciplines, like economies, can experience booms and busts. We document a boom in climate science, sustained by massive levels of funding by government entities, whose scientific direction is set by an extra-scientific organization, the IPCC, which has emerged as a “big player” in the scientific arena, championing the hypothesis of anthropogenic global warming.  We note the difficulties in obtaining definitive empirical clarity due to the complex nature of climate, the feedback between the effects of the IPCC’s advocacy and the government’s willingness to fund the science, the ideological and political agendas at play, the dangers to the integrity of scientific procedure in the context of ideological bias, and the poor performance of the "crony capitalist” enterprises that have grown on the back of politicized science."

"4....We claim that government policies and funding, and the emergence of a scientific “big player” in the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (the IPCC) aggressively championing the hypothesis of anthropogenic global warming (AGW), [1] have together fomented a boom in climate science which began in the early 1990s and has grown markedly over the past decade."...

3/6/2015, "Causes and consequences of the climate science boom," William Butos and Thomas McQuade
 

..............