5/8/14, Politifact rates Rep. Mike Rogers' claim false.
------------------------------------------------
5/14/14, "The GOP establishment eats the party's young to save its corporate welfare," Washington Examiner, David Freddoso
"A few weeks ago, I noted in this space that the anti-Tea Party Main Street Partnership is openly appealing to conservative paranoia in a high-profile Idaho race.
The super PAC, run by former Rep. Steve LaTourette, R-Ohio, ran an ad hinting that the challenger to Republican U.S. Rep. Mike Simpson is being backed by a liberal, pro-Nancy Pelosi group from outside Idaho - namely, the uber-conservative Club for Growth.
At the time, I wrote that Main Street might win a couple of races with this dishonest approach – and in fact Simpson will likely win on Tuesday. But to whatever extent this tactic succeeds, it only reinforces the very distrust that has turned primary voters against the “Main Street” model of Republican.
The same thing is now happening in Michigan - except it isn't a super PAC, but actual Republican lawmakers who are launching conservative-sounding attacks against a colleague for holding a principled conservative position.
Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., recently called Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., “al Qaeda's best friend in the Congress.” House Intelligence Chairman Mike Rogers, who hails from two districts over, said Amash “votes more with the Democrats than with the Republicans.” Politifact deemed Rogers's assertion to be “false,” finding that Amash “has never voted with his party less than 85 percent of the time in a given year.” (Amash argues that Rogers himself has voted more often with House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., which is true.)
These attacks coincide with a well-funded establishment effort to unseat Amash in the Michigan Republican primary this August – an effort to which Rogers, who is retiring, has contributed $5,000.
Amash is a young libertarian-leaning Republican who won his House seat in the Tea Party wave of 2010. He is one of the most active members of Congress on social media, frequently exchanging tweets with constituents and explaining each vote he takes with a new Facebook update. That's probably necessary, since he frequently finds himself on the unpopular end of bills that pass the House with broad bipartisan support.
At times, Amash's insistence on hewing to abstract principles has put him at odds not only with big business (“I don't think Justin Amash cares if Bank of America gives to him or not,” a lobbyist told Politico last year) but also with more pragmatic conservative goals. He lost the endorsement of Right to Life of Michigan in 2012 because he refused to vote for a bill banning sex-selective abortions. He explained on Facebook that he wants to ban all abortions, but opposes the criminalization of specific motives, for the same reasons he opposes hate-crime legislation.
Amash irritated Republican and Democratic leaders in 2013 by building a bipartisan House coalition to stop privacy abuses by the National Security Agency. He was also among the most outspoken opponents of U.S. involvement in both Libya and Syria.
Hence the hyperbolic charges regarding al Qaeda and Pelosi. Both are framed as coming from Amash's right flank, as if he's gone squishy since coming to Washington - not from a GOP establishment that aspires to build permanent power by trading corporate welfare for contributions from K Street.
The pro-life issue is the one on which Amash's primary challenger, Brian Ellis, is trying to make inroads. And that's smart -- it's a much better issue than, say, southwest Michigan's urgent need for a congressman who will reliably vote to reauthorize the Export-Import Bank and support other corporate welfare programs.
As in the Idaho race, the establishment's anti-establishment message evinces a cynical lack of interest in winning hearts and minds- not even with the pragmatic argument that “our guy can win.” Their best hope is to stoke the very distrust they helped create among conservatives in the first place." via Lucianne
========================
========================
Politifact rates Rep. Mike Rogers' claim false:
"Establishment Republicans who have for years operated under the threat of "getting primaried" by conservative challengers are hoping to turn the tables in Michigan, where there’s an all-out brawl to oust tea party favorite Rep. Justin Amash.
Amash has become a polarizing figure within the Republican caucus, according to Politico,
and some of his colleagues aren’t pulling punches in taking on the
Michigander and his hardline anti-tax, anti-spending, anti-federal
government stances.
Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., called Amash, "al-Qaida’s best friend in the Congress." Harsh.
A fellow Michigan Republican, Rep. Mike Rogers, said Amash is "completely out of line with" voters in his district.
Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., called Amash, "al-Qaida’s best friend in the Congress." Harsh.
A fellow Michigan Republican, Rep. Mike Rogers, said Amash is "completely out of line with" voters in his district.
"He votes more with the Democrats than with the Republicans, and that’s not out of principle, that’s out of him branding himself as something different," said Rogers, who has contributed $5,000 to Amash’s primary opponent, Brian Ellis.
Amash’s countered: "I vote less often with (House Minority Leader) Nancy Pelosi, the real San Francisco Democrat, than any member of Congress."
How can you vote with Democrats more than Republicans and rarely vote on the same side as Pelosi, the House’s top Democrat? Something isn’t adding up here, so we decided to take a look.
How Amash has voted
A spokesman for Amash linked us to OpenCongress.org, a website from the nonpartisan Sunshine Foundation that aggregates voting records.
The site also studies which colleague on each side of the aisle votes with members of Congress most and least since January 2013.
Pelosi’s profile page says the Republican she least often votes with is, indeed, Amash. The two have been on the same side of just 22 percent of votes.
That’s partly achieved by Amash staking out positions that put him against most of Congress on widely bipartisan measures.
For example, Amash was one of only two House members to vote against a bill to reauthorize spending for the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children to assist local law enforcement agencies in training for and coordinating efforts to rescue missing children. On Facebook, Amash said the bill created federal bureaucracy and the tax dollars would be better spent locally.
(Republicans can criticize Amash’s record, but he’s unique in his diligence about explaining nearly all of his votes on Facebook.)
So if Amash seldom votes with Pelosi, is it possible he still votes with Democrats more, as Rogers said? In a word, no.
As a whole, Amash has more often sided with the GOP caucus. Amash’s profile on OpenCongress.org says he has voted with his party 82 percent of the time since January 2013.
There are certainly many Republicans who toe the party line more closely. Rogers, for example, was with the majority of his GOP colleagues for 96 percent of roll calls since 2013. But there are Republicans who vote with the GOP less often than Amash this Congress, too, though none in Michigan.
On some issues, though, Amash has joined forces with Democrats. His high-profile fight to curb NSA funding for metadata collection — which put Amash on the map with civil libertarians — enlisted a coalition of Republicans and Democrats weary of the military-industrial complex.
The vote on his measure narrowly failed, with 111 Democrats supporting it — despite strong objections from President Barack Obama — alongside 94 Republicans.
So where does Rogers’ claim come from?
Rogers spokeswoman had no response but forwarded our request to Amash’s challenger Ellis. They noted that in 2012, a Congressional Quarterly analysis found Amash’s votes put him on the same side of President Barack Obama 51 percent of the time.
It’s an interesting tidbit, but it won’t help Rogers on the Truth-O-Meter.
The analysis only looked at 61 votes that year where Obama had a stated position. It includes many consequential bills, but it’s just a fraction of the total votes taken in 2012. Further, in 2011 and 2013, Amash was opposite Obama 75 percent of the time.
But it did help us find a few interesting examples of Amash voting with Obama’s favored positions.
For example, Amash voted "no" on a GOP bill in 2012 that would have extended lower rates for student loans and pay for it with cuts to Obamacare. It passed the House despite a veto threat from Obama.
On his Facebook page, Amash said he sided against it because he didn’t believe the cuts covered the cost of lowering student loan rates.
Also in 2012, he voted against Republicans on a bill to replace across-the-board spending cuts (the so-called "sequester") with other more targeted cuts, while lifting spending caps on the military.
Obama, instead, wanted to replace the sequester with tax increases and cut in other ways; Amash said he opposed the Republican proposal because it increased spending.
More recently, Amash was one of just three Republicans (and 20 lawmakers in total) not to vote for more sanctions against Iran last July. At the time, the Obama administration was asking for some leeway from Congress to approach the newly elected Iranian regime with alternatives. Amash later said of his vote: "If our goal is peaceful reform within Iran, it would be wise to give the new president an opportunity to talk before turning to new threats."
But again, these are a relatively small number of high-profile votes. Congressional Quarterly found Amash never voted with his party less than 85 percent of the time in a given year.
Our ruling
Rogers said Amash "votes more with the Democrats than with the Republicans." Rogers didn’t back up his claim, but we found two sources that showed that Amash has sided with Republicans upward of 80 percent of the time. That may be lower than many of his colleagues, and we found found a few high-profile examples of his voting against his own party. But by the numbers, he votes far more often with Republicans than Democrats.
We rate Rogers’ statement False."
.
========================
Comment: Rep. Devin Nunes is now officially a Beltway sellout. As to proven liar Mike Rogers, we look forward to more of the same from him in his new job as a radio talk show host.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment