Sunday, February 9, 2014

In spring 1976 the GOP had only 38 US Senators, were humiliated more than two to one in the House, had only 13 of nation's 50 governors. GOP suits were as smug and feckless as they are today-Kuznicki

.
2/6/14, "A Review of Reagan’s Revolution: The Untold Story Of The Campaign That Started It All," Jen Kuznicki

"Reagan announced his candidacy to challenge the incumbent Gerald Ford on my third birthday. At three, I would not have known what the Republican Party was or what it was doing, but (author Craig) Shirley filled me in.

“Following Nixon’s resignation in August of 1974 and Gerald Ford’s pardon of the ex-President, the Republican Party was decimated in the fall elections.” 

Voters threw out dozens of Republican legislators in 1974. The GOP lost forty-three Representatives and four Senators in the off-year elections.”

“By the spring of 1976, the Republican Party had only thirty-eight U.S, Senators who could not even mount an effective filibuster. In the House, they were outnumbered by better than two to one. Only thirteen of the nation’s fifty Governors were Republicans. The state legislatures were even worse.”

The Party was looking for leadership, and although you can’t parallel then with now entirely, all through the book you get the recurring thought: The more things change, the more they stay the same.

The establishment at the time was like the establishment is now, they were just as feckless, and just as smug. The media were saying the exact same thing then as they do now, that Conservatives don’t win, and that the Republican Party must moderate and be bipartisan in their approach. Conservatives were just as pissed now as they were then, well, maybe a bit more now, but then…

Everything became more clear for me by reading this book, the times I thought I was nuts for stepping into politics, I realized that it is the fight for what is right that keeps all going forward and pushing and influencing and working to spread not only the conservative message, but to do so, as Reagan did, with bold colors, no pale pastels.

Reagan opposed the liberal stance of many of the Party’s leadership, and he said so publicly and privately, and wrote reams about what was the current approach and what would be his approach. He was always writing, as Nancy would say, and they were always holding hands and doting on one another reflecting a strong marriage.

There is a balance in the book between what would appeal to certain cogs working within the party; the money side, the communications side, the advance people, the writers, the deal makers, and what would appeal to the policy stewards, the political officeholders, and the influential media personalities. But the “story of the campaign that started it all,” is the story you need to read, especially if you, like me, are relatively new to politics, and you want to believe there will be a Reagan-like leader once again.

Ever since I heard the words, “The era of Reagan is over,” I wondered if there could be a way to reverse that line of thinking and that trend in modern politics. After reading this book, I know that the era of Reagan is not dead, and I see the parallels of today’s political groundswells that got thousands of Republicans elected in 2010, because the candidates ran on Reagan’s ideals. The Reagan revolution happened and it was about the love of a particular person who was very politically savvy and strong, but it also was about the approach to life that is conservatism, and how it itself is timeless, and it can appeal to all.

Since the Republican establishment has decided that the country wants socialism and wants to be the party to hand it to them, the time is ripe for a Reagan to step forward and perhaps we can witness another political revolution and work to make everyone proud of our country once again."

=====================

Comment: Sabotage Republicans are only happy when the GOP is in the minority. Thanks to Mark Levin's show I've heard some of Reagan's speeches which of course are wonderful. Unfortunately the ideas in his speeches had no chance of saving this country because he chose George H.W. Bush as his vice president. The Bush people have never wanted a two party system. They've always wanted the same top down massive central government control democrats favor. The Bush crowd's only ideology is being in charge of elections. They're obsessed with preventing us from getting the candidate we need.

=====================

11/8/13, The Sabotage Republicans,” By Jeffrey Lord, American Spectator

------------------------------------------------

11/20/1990, "George Bush, Meet Woodrow Wilson," NY Times, John B. Judis

George H.W. Bush favored 'new world order' led by unelected, unaccountable UN parasites and thugs:


 
.

No comments: