1/4/13, "What makes Tim Scott 'anti-civil rights'?" NY Daily News, Michael Meyers, opinion
“Like many fellow Republicans, the history-making African-American senator flunked the NAACP’s scorecard. But why?"
"How is it possible for South Carolina’s Tim Scott, the first African-American from the Deep South since Reconstruction to become a U.S. Senator, to get written off by the nation’s oldest civil rights group as anti-civil rights?
“We have Republicans who believe in civil rights. Unfortunately, he is not one of them.” That’s exactly how Ben Jealous, the NAACP president, described the black man that the state’s governor, Nikki Haley, a member of an ethnic minority herself, appointed to replace Jim DeMint in the Senate.
Curious, I wanted to know how Scott drew an “F” on the NAACP’s legislative report card. Online, I found the NAACP’s latest assessment of the 112th Congress (January to December 2011).
Curious, I wanted to know how Scott drew an “F” on the NAACP’s legislative report card. Online, I found the NAACP’s latest assessment of the 112th Congress (January to December 2011).
Scott was not alone; he flunked the NAACP’s scorecard with an “F” along with more than 55% of his colleagues in the House of Representatives. On the Senate side, the NAACP flunked 46% of the nation’s elected officials.
No surprise that half the House and Senate are civil rights failures in the minds of today’s NAACP, because to the organization, “civil rights ideals” may as well read “liberal dogma.”
Among the 15 core issues the NAACP described as "bread and butter" civil rights concerns of its board and rank and file — the ones lawmakers got graded on — were: support for EPA efforts to regulate greenhouse gas emissions; support for federal government contracting only with employers who pay prevailing wages; and support for funding of Obamacare….
Meanwhile, the NAACP opposes vouchers for urban kids to attend private schools.
Equally startling, because it contradicts the NAACP’s previous pretensions of non-partisanship, the organization graded legislators on whether they supported President Obama’s appointees to the federal judiciary — as well as the confirmation of Richard Cordray as director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
When I was the NAACP's assistant national director, we were prohibited by board policy from either endorsing or opposing candidates for elective or appointive office. That neutrality was the core of our non-partisan stance. No more.
Back then, we defined civil rights as equality of opportunity in hiring; fair housing; non-segregated, integrated schooling; democratic unions; the elimination of systemic race prejudice, and stamping out of stereotyping. No more.
With the regime now in charge at the NAACP, civil rights ain’t what they used to be. Their closest legislative report card concern even remotely resembling civil rights was their avowed support for a commission “to review America’s criminal justice system” for racial and ethnic bias. The NAACP’s explanatory jargon says the body “would be charged with looking at how we arrived at this convoluted mess…”
Convoluted mess, indeed; that’s the best description of the NAACP’s litmus tests for grading the civil rights bona fides of legislators.
Unlike Scott, I am a liberal. I thought the only things he and I had in common were our skin color and our respective socio-economic backgrounds. Now, add one more thing to the list: our frustration and bemusement with the litmus tests used by the nation’s oldest and largest civil rights organization.”
.
“Meyers is executive director of the New York Civil Rights Coalition.”
=================================
"NAACP supports US government's efforts to curb greenhouse gases," donate.naacp.org
"Efforts to slow or stop the effects of global warming are especially important to low-income and racial and ethnic minority Americans as we disproportionately impacted by the effects of climate change. Manifestations of climate change such as storms, floods, and climate variability have a much more serious impact on African-Americans and other racial and ethnic minorities economically, socially and through our health and well-being. Hurricane Katrina, and its aftermath, is but one example of how the results of climate change can have a disparate and often tragic impact on communities of color.”…(parag. 3)
.
No comments:
Post a Comment