Wednesday, February 6, 2013

The last place an actual conservative would go to go to launch a new conservative venture would be the NY Times-Jones, CNS News

.
2/6/13, "Karl Rove Vs. the 'Far Right'," CNS News, S. Jones

"If I were launching a new conservative venture, the last venue I'd choose for the announcement would be the New York Times. Karl Rove has gone to the Times to announce that he has created a new "conservative" entity "to recruit seasoned candidates and protect Senate incumbents from challenges by far-right conservatives and Tea Party enthusiasts."

Rove argues that Republican fortunes have been ruined by "far-right conservatives," but he's shamelessly calling this entity the "Conservative Victory Project." Yes, and I could call myself Ray Lewis, but it doesn't make it so.

Whaddaya know? The liberal Democrats at the Times love this idea. They call it "the most robust attempt yet by Republicans to impose a new sense of discipline on the party." They would love a group to "discipline" conservatives right out of the GOP nominating process. What the heck? They could call themselves "conservative," too.


It's reminiscent of all the reporters who desperately wanted Colin Powell to run for president in 1996 because apparently Bob Dole was too fringy, and, as Howard Fineman said at the time, reporters "want a Republican Party they can live with."...

The New York Times quoted Rove staffer Steven Law on their alleged philosophy: "Our approach will be to institutionalize the Buckley rule: Support the most conservative candidate who can win." Uh-huh. So that's what Rove was doing when he supported Sen. Arlen Specter over Pat Toomey in 2004. 

Before that term was over, Specter became a Democrat.
 
That's what moderates were doing when they supported Charlie Crist over Marco Rubio in Florida in 2010. 

Crist, too, became a Democrat.

The Times did not explore Steven Law's win-loss record. As executive director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee in 1998 and 2000, Law's work ended up with zero gains in 1998 and four seats lost in 2000. The Times didn't want to remind anyone how Rove "the Architect" predicted in 2006 that the GOP would retain control of both houses of Congress, and he proceeded to lose them both.


Wouldn't that information help the public evaluate just how much the Republicans need Team Rove's new "discipline" to win?

When it comes to winning, they supported Sen. Robert Bennett over Mike Lee (who won the seat) in Utah. 


The GOP moderates preferred Lt. Gov David Dewhurst over Ted Cruz in Texas in 2012

The list seems endless."....via Mark Levin twitter

----------------------------------

Ed. note: Karl Rove of course is the Bush clan stand in. The entire group must leave the public stage.  We don't have monarchies in the US. Especially not ones who have trashed us.

 
.

No comments: