.
2/13/13,
"Obama Unveils His Economy-Killing Cap-And-Tax Plan," IBD Editorial
"The president's proposed Energy Security Fund will stifle the private
energy sector boom and provide permanent funding for future Solyndras
and electric cars that nobody wants. And what about that pipeline, sir?
A nonexistent crisis is a terrible thing to waste, and in justifying
his proposal for a cap-and-tax scheme, President Obama claimed in his
State Of The Union that "the 12 hottest years on record have all come in
the last 15."
He was lying.
The fact is, according to new data released quietly last October by
Britain's Met Office, the world's natural post-Ice Age warming trend
stopped about 16 years ago. From the beginning of 1997 until August
2012, there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures.
Undaunted by the truth, Obama claimed, again falsely, "Heat waves,
droughts, wildfires, floods, all are now more frequent and more
intense." But, for example, as Marc Morano documents at Climate Depot,
all of the world's most devastating floods occurred before 1976.
The U.S. has been experiencing less and less drought since the Dust
Bowl of the 1930s. Deaths due to extreme weather are radically
declining, global tropical cyclone activity is near historic lows, and
the frequency of major U.S. hurricanes has declined.
President Obama linked Superstorm Sandy to climate change, yet Roger
Pielke, professor of environmental studies at the University of
Colorado-Boulder, writes: "The U.S. is currently experiencing the
longest-ever recorded period with no strikes of a Category 3 or stronger
hurricane."
As for tornadoes, Pielke reports: "Over the past six decades, tornado
damage has declined after accounting for development that has put more
property into harm's way."
Astonishingly, the president invoked an emission-belching China as
our role model in fighting climate change, saying that "countries like
China keep going all-in on clean energy."
China has in fact overtaken the U.S. as the world's top polluter,
according to a study published in the Journal of Environment Economics
and Management by a University of California-Berkeley research team. And
the evidence is seen daily in the skies over Beijing.
Yes, Mr. President, oil and natural gas production is up and emissions are down. But the credit is due to the technology known as hydraulic fracturing, or
fracking, employed on private lands in states like Pennsylvania and
North Dakota. It is a technology
you and your environmentalist buddies
are trying to prohibit.
If the president's proposal sounded familiar, it may be because it's
an echo of the $50 billion Strategic Energy Fund presidential candidate
Hillary Clinton proposed.
It was to siphon off of oil companies' "excessive" profits to promote
alternative energy development, much like the windfall profit tax and
Jimmy Carter's long-defunct SynFuels Corp. were supposed to do.
Her proposal itself was an echo of one of the Clinton-Gore
administration's first acts in office. It was a proposal, with Al Gore
taking the lead, for a $72 billion BTU tax on all fossil fuels,
including oil, coal and natural gas, that would have done nothing but
increase energy prices and decrease economic activity.
The Earth is not warming and carbon emissions are not driving climate
change. Yet that will probably be the reason Obama will use to kill off
the Keystone XL pipeline, unmentioned in his address, which would bring
Canadian crude from the oil sands of Alberta to our Gulf Coast
refineries. Enviros claim the extraction process releases too much
carbon dioxide.
"Should the eco-activists be allowed to shut down the U.S. economy
based on faulty science?" asks Len Maier, president of Friends of
Science, a climate science review organization. He thinks not, and
neither do we.
Instead of more Solyndras and Chevy Volts, we would prefer the
800,000 barrels of oil a day and the estimated 343,000 new U.S. jobs by
2015 if Keystone XL is allowed to proceed.
Really, only our business climate needs to be changed." via Tom Nelson
==============================
Mexico's
Zeta gang and its coal mines near US border given cover in face of
constant US bashing by Beinecke's NRDC which ignores science of US CO2
drop as world's worst polluters
belch emissions into US. Coal greedy China emissions settle in western
US. US is only 1.5% of planet, 1000 new coal plants being built, banks
spending billions to finance them
Coal mining "more lucrative for Zetas than selling drugs."
==============================
11/17/12, "Mexican druglords strike gold in coal," AFP via Gloucester City News
============================
Above, August, 2007: “China’s industrial growth depends on coal, plentiful but polluting, from mines like this one in Shenmu, Shaanxi Province, behind a village store,” NY Times.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment