Pope accuses sexual abuse victims of Chile's most notorious pedophile of slander, says "Show me some proof." Chileans shocked at end of visit that was supposed to heal wounds. In 2015 Francis even promoted the pedophile's protector-AP...(Francis is a disgrace to the Catholic Church and all religions and should resign: 18 US Catholic dioceses and religious orders have filed for bankruptcy protection amid sexual abuse expenses)

.
“In the typical Chilean family, parents (now) think twice before sending their kids to Catholic school."..."So far, 18 U.S. Catholic dioceses and religious orders have filed for bankruptcy protection during the ongoing sexual abuse crisis in the Catholic church."

1/18/18, "Pope shocks Chile by accusing sex abuse victims of slander," AP, Nicole Winfield, Santiago, Chile

"Pope Francis accused victims of Chile’s most notorious pedophile of slander Thursday, an astonishing end to a visit meant to help heal the wounds of a sex abuse scandal that has cost the Catholic Church its credibility in the country.

Francis said that until he sees proof that Bishop Juan Barros was complicit in covering up the sex crimes of the Rev. Fernando Karadimas, such accusations against Barros are “all calumny.”

The pope’s remarks drew shock from Chileans and immediate rebuke from victims and their advocates. They noted the accusers were deemed credible enough by the Vatican that it sentenced Karadima to a lifetime of “penance and prayer” for his crimes in 2011. A Chilean judge also found the victims to be credible, saying that while she had to drop criminal charges against Karadima because too much time had passed, proof of his crimes wasn’t lacking.

“As if I could have taken a selfie or a photo while Karadima abused me and others and Juan Barros stood by watching it all,” tweeted Barros’ most vocal accuser, Juan Carlos Cruz. “These people are truly crazy, and the pontiff talks about atonement to the victims. Nothing has changed, and his plea for forgiveness is empty.”

The Karadima scandal dominated Francis’ visit to Chile and the overall issue of sex abuse and church cover-up was likely to factor into his three-day trip to Peru that began late Thursday.

Karadima’s victims reported to church authorities as early as 2002 that he would kiss and fondle them in the swank Santiago parish he ran, but officials refused to believe them. Only when the victims went public with their accusations in 2010 did the Vatican launch an investigation that led to Karadima being removed from ministry.

The emeritus archbishop of Santiago subsequently apologized for having refused to believe the victims from the start.

Francis reopened the wounds of the scandal in 2015 when he named Barros, a protege of Karadima, as bishop of the southern diocese of Osorno. Karadima’s victims say Barros knew of the abuse, having seen it, but did nothing. Barros has denied the allegations.

His appointment outraged Chileans, badly divided the Osorno diocese and further undermined the church’s already shaky credibility in the country.

Francis had sought to heal the wounds by meeting this week with abuse victims and begging forgiveness for the crimes of church pastors. But on Thursday, he struck a defiant tone when asked by a Chilean journalist about Barros.

“The day they bring me proof against Bishop Barros, I’ll speak,” Francis said. “There is not one shred of proof against him. It’s all calumny. Is that clear?”

Francis had defended the appointment before, calling the Osorno controversy “stupid” and the result of a campaign mounted by leftists. But The Associated Press reported last week that the Vatican was so worried about the fallout from the Karadima affair that it was prepared in 2014 to ask Barros and two other Karadima-trained bishops to resign and go on a yearlong sabbatical.

According to a Jan. 31, 2015, letter obtained by AP from Francis to the executive committee of the Chilean bishops’ conference, the plan fell apart and Barros was sent to Osorno.

Juan Carlos Claret, spokesman for a group of Osorno lay Catholics who have mounted a three-year campaign against Barros, questioned why Francis was now accusing the victims of slandering Barros when the Vatican was so convinced of their claims that it planned to remove him in 2014.

“Isn’t the pastoral problem that we’re living (in Osorno) enough to get rid of him?” Claret asked.

The reference was to the fact that — guilty or not — Barros has been unable to do his job because so many Osorno Catholics and priests don’t recognize him as their bishop. They staged an unprecedented protest during his 2015 installation ceremony and have protested his presence ever since.

Anne Barrett Doyle, of the online database BishopAccountability.org, said it was “sad and wrong” for the pope to discredit the victims since “the burden of proof here rests with the church, not the victims — and especially not with victims whose veracity has already been affirmed.”

“He has just turned back the clock to the darkest days of this crisis,” she said in a statement. “Who knows how many victims now will decide to stay hidden, for fear they will not be believed?”

Indeed, Catholic officials for years accused victims of slandering and attacking the church with their claims. But up until Francis’ words Thursday, many in the church and Vatican had come to reluctantly acknowledge that victims usually told the truth and that the church for decades had wrongly sought to protect its own.

German Silva, a political scientist at Santiago’s Universidad Mayor, said the pope’s comments were a “tremendous error” that will reverberate in Chile and beyond.

Patricio Navia, political science professor at Diego Portales University in Santiago, said Francis had gone much further than Chilean bishops in acknowledging the sexual abuse scandal, which many Chileans appreciated.

“Then right before leaving, Francis turns around and says: ‘By the way, I don’t think Barros is guilty. Show me some proof,’” Navia said, adding that the comment will probably erase any good will the pope had won over the issue.

Navia said the Karadima scandal had radically changed how Chileans view the church.

“In the typical Chilean family, parents (now) think twice before sending their kids to Catholic school because you never know what is going to happen,” Navia said."

===========

Added: "Bankruptcy Protection in the Abuse Crisis," Bishop Accountability

"So far, 18 U.S. Catholic dioceses and religious orders have filed for bankruptcy protection during the ongoing sexual abuse crisis in the Catholic church: 15 dioceses and 3 religious orders, the Oregon Province of the Jesuits and the Congregation of the Christian Brothers, and most recently the Crosier Fathers and Brothers. On this page we assemble basic information and documents on each of these bankruptcy filings, as well as general information on the process and the issues involved.

On August 4, 2015, after a protracted and contentious process, a proposed settlement in the Archdiocese of Milwaukee was announced totaling $21 million and compensating 330 of the original 579 claimants.

The Crosier Fathers and Brothers filed on June 1, 2017, the most recent filing. 

Dioceses and Religious Orders
That Have Filed for Bankruptcy Protection
  1. Archdiocese of Portland OR (filed 7/6/04)
  2. Diocese of Tucson AZ (9/20/04)
  3. Diocese of Spokane WA (12/6/04)
  4. Diocese of Davenport IA (10/10/06)
  5. Diocese of San Diego CA (2/27/07)
  6. Diocese of Fairbanks AK (3/1/08)
  7. Oregon Province of the Jesuits (2/17/09)
  8. Diocese of Wilmington DE and MD (10/18/09)
  9. Archdiocese of Milwaukee WI (1/4/11) 10. Congregation of the Christian Brothers (4/28/11)
11. Diocese of Gallup NM (11/12/13)
12. Diocese of Stockton CA (1/15/14)
13. Diocese of Helena MT (1/31/14)
14. Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis MN (1/16/15)
15. Diocese of Duluth MN (12/7/15)
16. Diocese of New Ulm MN (3/3/17)
17. Diocese of Great Falls-Billings MT (3/31/17)  
18. Crosier Fathers and Brothers MN and AZ (6/1/17) 

General Information on the Process and the Issues
• Video Reports on the Bankruptcy Issue
• Helpful Links
• Church Finances and Bankruptcy in General
• Diocesan Assets and Real Estate
• Other Dioceses"...


................


___