Monday, October 24, 2011

Who but the GOP would advance the trillion dollar, organized crime infested global warming gag by elevating Berkeley's Muller?

.
A longtime believer in man made global warming, that it has caused wars, will cause more, and needs one world government (item at end), a UC Berkeley celebrity science guy named Richard Muller is now a global warming hero thanks in part to Republicans. In his worldwide media blitz, Muller says he has ended alleged confusion, that 'earth' was warmer for a few years so 'the debate' is over!
for Goldman Sachs and the rest, wants everyone to be "calm" and accept the greatest crime ever perpetrated on humanity. Muller is a government dependent celebrity selling the government's agenda which is for us to shut up.
  • World temperatures have always fluctuated. Even if temperatures rose slightly since 1950, it doesn't mean the earth is warming. That's not the money issue anyway.
He doesn't address the key fact that older data was discarded (item 6) by CRU in the 1980's, is gone forever and impossible to reproduce. And he made no conclusions about the
  • 6 core issues on which the climate industry pivots:
  • that CO2 causes global warming,
  • that man's industries have created excess CO2,
  • that humanity's survival is threatened and islands are sinking as a result,
  • that the evil US middle class must pay billions in perpetuity to solve the problem they caused
  • that governments must regulate CO2 emissions
  • that the UN and others must administer the world's atmosphere and resources henceforth.
Recently he said global warming was a serious problem but people were turned off to it by inaccurate stories about polar bears and the like. Now it's all over though,
Word games about a deadly issue-- at a time when it's open season on the American middle class, its own government leading the charge. Politicians are happy to sell the country out to organized crime, climate profiteers, and parasitic UN/world government types.

From the article, 7/19/1996:

"He's (Muller) been serving on international disarmament panels
  • with US and Russian scientists."...(parag. 4)
The main thing he's concerned about is the key matter of understanding how the climate works. "What causes climate? What affects it? To what extent
  • do we affect climate?
To what extent are we disturbing it? These are important issues. I tend to be very passionate about this. When I think about it, I say: What is the effect if the temperature were to drop one or two degrees? The answer that I get is that areas which are good for agriculture will probably shift no more than three hundred miles.
  • But when that has happened
  • in the past, it has led to war.
"When people talk about global warming, we're talking about the great breadbasket
  • becoming a desert,
and perhaps the productive regions shifting north. So yes, it might be nicer if it were a little warmer in Berkeley during the summer,
  • but that's not what we're talking about.
And yes, if we had a global government and everybody loved everybody else and people were happy to migrate across national boundaries and could do so freely....
  • But I fear that
  • changes in climate have been a major-
  • if not the major-
Climate change is potentially the biggest disaster that could occur. And
  • if humans have taken over and are now
  • the dominant driving force for climate- which I think might be the case-
  • than we need to understand how it works." (item at end of piece)
-------------------------

Comment which should replace all the headlines but won't:
May 25, 2011 12:37 pm

"“….Muller testified that his preliminary findings confirm what mainstream scientists have been saying all along: Earth is warming in line with the projections of climate models…”

Mr. Muller, myself and others concur on the following:

We may be able to agree that the Earth’s climate is experiencing a warming trend. There is no conclusive proof

  • that carbon dioxide is driving this trend,

nor is there proof that this warming trend is non-natural and unlike previous warm periods.

  • There is no conclusive proof that
government regulation of carbon dioxide emissions
  • would have any effect on this trend."

------------------------

11/29/09, "Climate change data dumped," TimesOnline UK, by Jonathan Leake (now subscription)

"Scientists at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation. The data were gathered from weather stations around the world and then adjusted to take account of variables in the way they were collected. The revised figures were kept, but the originals — stored on paper and magnetic tape — The admission follows the leaking of a thousand private emails sent and received by Professor Phil Jones, the CRU’s director. In them he discusses thwarting climate sceptics seeking access to such data. In a statement on its website, the CRU said:
  • We do not hold the original raw data but only the value-added (quality controlled and homogenised) data.”...Climate change sceptics have long been keen to examine exactly how its data were compiled. That is now impossible. Roger Pielke, professor of environmental studies at Colorado University, discovered data had been lost when he asked for original records.
  • The CRU is basically saying, ‘Trust us’.
  • So much for settling questions and resolving debates with science,” he said.
Jones was not in charge of the CRU when the data were thrown away in the 1980s, a time when climate change was seen as a less pressing issue.
  • The lost material was used to build the databases that have been his life’s work, showing how the world has warmed by 0.8C over the past 157 years. He and his colleagues say this temperature rise is “unequivocally” linked to greenhouse gas emissions generated by humans.
Their findings are one of the main pieces of evidence used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which says global warming is a threat to humanity."

-------------------

Der Spiegel, 11/19/09, "Stagnating Temperatures: Climatologists baffled by global warming time-out," by Gerald Traufetter

------------------

7/19/1996, "Get out your mittens. Richard Muller thinks he knows what causes the Earth' s ice ages to ebb and flow. But is anybody listening?" East Bay Express, by Robert Hurwitt, lbl.gov

------------------

3/31/11, "Berkeley scientists' climate data review puts them at center of national debate," LA Times, Margot Roosevelt

--------------------

5/25/11, "A Friendly Note to Richard Muller," Legal Planet, Jonathan Zasloff

---------------------

10/21/11, "The Case Against Global-Warming Skepticism," Wall St. Journal, Richard Muller,
-------------------

7/16/10, "Carbon Trading Used as Money-Laundering Front," Jakarta Globe

------------------

4/8/11, "Global Warming Alarmism's Long March through State and Local Institutions," American Thinker, Peter Wilson

--------------------

4/1/11, "Experts Heat Up Over Berkeley Lab Scientist's Quest to 'Calm' Climate Change Debate," by Lauren Morello of ClimateWire

--------------------

10/9/2010, "US physics professor: 'Global warming is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life'," UK Telegraph, J. Delingpole

------------------

1/2/2010, "The Met Office gives us the 'warmist' Weather," by Christopher Booker

---------------
1/1/2010, UK Met Office missing data for 10 UK stations

----------------

12/5/09, "Climategate Reveals the Most Influential Tree in the World," UK Telegraph, by Christopher Booker

--------------------

10/26/09: "Palms once grew in ice-free Arctic"

------------------

4/5/2010, "The Great American Bubble Machine," Rolling Stone, Matt Taibbi, originally published 7/2/2009.

"From tech stocks to high gas prices, Goldman Sachs has engineered every major market manipulation since the Great Depression -- and they're about to do it again"

From Rolling Stone article: "A groundbreaking new commodities bubble,
  • cap-and-trade.
The new carbon-credit market is a virtual repeat of the commodities-market casino that's been kind to Goldman, If the plan goes forward as expected, the rise in prices
  • will be government-mandated.
  • Goldman won't even have to rig the game.
from Rolling Stone article by Matt Taibbi

-----------------------

12/4/09,"Carbon Capitalists warming to climate market using derivatives," Bloomberg News


.

No comments: