Wednesday, September 2, 2015

Rush Limbaugh: Trump movement isn't about conservatism-It's about Americanism

.
"I, for one, am tired of conservatism being nothing more than some intellectual feast every day." Rush Limbaugh

9/2/15, "The Trump Movement Isn't About Conservatism -- It's About Americanism," Rush Limbaugh

"RUSH: Yesterday or the day before it was a really vicious piece, which I've got here in the Wall Street Journal by a guy named Bret Stephens who said if you're not appalled by Donald Trump, you are appalling. That's how it opened. 





So there's all these conservative media types pulling their hair out. They're thinking that you people supporting Donald Trump have abandoned your conservatism. What they don't understand is that support for Trump is about much more than conservatism. I don't even think it's about conservatism per se. But they are so threatened. And these are the people, many of them, who don't do anything but write, who don't try to end up provoking people to action. 

They just write, and they want people to say, "Wow, that was really smart, man....That's a smart commentator," but beyond that, they don't do anything. And now these people are all of a sudden feeling threatened by Trump. They're missing the whole point of why people are supporting Trump, I think. Trump's not even claiming to be a conservative, for crying out loud. He's claiming to be an American.

CALLER:  Right, and what we're sick of, for one thing, is the Republicans being the Washington Generals to the Globetrotters....

RUSH: Not only that, it's arranged beforehand that the Generals are gonna lose. It's not even a real competition. And that's what you're saying that it feels like to you. Anyway, she's got a great question here, folks, and it requires and deserves expansion of thought by me....

RUSH:...Our previous caller reminded me that people have been calling filled with despair in recent years-despondent, depressed-that the country was finished, that they did not see any evidence that traditional institutions and values were represented by a majority of the population anymore....

Now, prior to Trump, the conservative movement, the intellectuals in the movement were very precise in their definitions of what is and what isn't conservative and who is and who isn't a conservative and who's entitled to speak for it and who isn't.... 

When Buckley passed away it then became an open competition for who was gonna replace him....Who was gonna be the guy that determined what was and who was and what isn't and who isn't conservative. The battle's never been won. I mean, there is no singular figure, particularly in the literary world, to have filled the Buckley role....

As such, it has taken on many different identities. And the Trump insurgency here has--I don't know if the word "exposed" is right, but it has served to illustrate the fractious nature of conservatism as a movement.  I have--and I say this honestly--I'm not trying to sound know-it-all-ish or condescending to anybody. Speaking for myself, I have never thought of Donald Trump as a conservative. 

My whole life I've known him. I know him socially, play golf with him now and then, I mean, I can reach him on the phone if I want to. But I've never considered him a conservative, and I've never considered him a liberal, don't misunderstand.  But as far as a movement conservative, Trump hasn't been. I've never been under the impression that he is. And I've never held it against him. 

And I've never felt like, well, he's not worthy of speaking on things I believe in 'cause he's not a conservative. That's not my attitude. I know he's not a liberal. I know that he's nowhere near what modern day liberalism is. What I also believe fervently is that all of this support for Trump, this movement, whatever you call this that's happening with Trump, it's not about conservatism. And that doesn't bother me. 

But some in the conservative movement are pulling their hair out over this. And, like I mentioned Bret Stephens writing in the Wall Street Journal, this piece, it is just vicious to conservatives. It's just over-the-top vicious. It stands alone in that regard, but there are others in the conservative movement who are also writing pieces admonishing people supporting Trump, that he's not conservative, you're being fooled, you're destroying conservatism by allowing Trump to carry the mantle of conservatism....

Some of these conservative intellectuals who are having a big problem...I think they're missing what this is all about. Now, why they're missing it is a whole other bunch of theories. 

Now, I have the Bret Stephens thing right here and I want to quote from it. "The Donald and the Demagogues -- If by now you don’t find Donald Trump appalling, you’re appalling." That's how this piece opens. 

"If you have reached physical maturity and still chuckle at Mr. Trump’s pubescent jokes about Rosie O’Donnell or Heidi Klum, you will never reach mental maturity. If you watched Mr. Trump mock fellow candidate Lindsey Graham’s low poll numbers and didn’t cringe at the lack of class, you are incapable of class. If you think we need to build new airports in Queens the way they build them in Qatar, you should be sent to join the millions of forced laborers who do construction in the Persian Gulf. It would serve you right."

That's just the first paragraph. 

"Since Mr. Trump joined the GOP presidential field and leaped to the top of the polls, several views have been offered to explain his popularity. He conveys a can-do image. He is the bluntest of the candidates in addressing public fears of cultural and economic dislocation. He toes no line, serves no PAC, abides no ideology, is beholden to no man. He addresses the broad disgust of everyday Americans with their failed political establishment.

"And so forth and so on -- a parade of semi-sophisticated theories that act as bathroom deodorizer to mask the stench of this candidacy. Mr. Trump is a loudmouth vulgarian appealing to quieter vulgarians. These vulgarians comprise a significant percentage of the GOP base. The leader isn’t the problem. The people are. It takes the demos to make the demagogue."

Well, this is the perfect illustration of the problem that so-called conservative intellectuals are having with the Trump insurgency or the Trump campaign, to the point now that they feel it necessary to insult the people supporting Trump in addition to insulting Trump. 

Now, these are the people who routinely tell us that we are racists or nativists or whatever because we do not believe in their policy of open borders, and because we are intolerant of this invasion of people which they call illegal immigration, which we term it invasion, since we're not tolerant, we're not sophisticated. We don't have the ability to understand what this country's all about and what this country needs for a vibrant future and so forth. And it's one of the biggest disconnects I've ever seen in my life between Washington and the rest of the people in the country....

Explaining the Trump phenomenon is not that difficult. At the top of all of it is this invasion. At the top of the list of reasons why Trump has a large and growing following, it's all about immigration and how the establishment inside the Beltway is now openly, not even disguising, 

what they've thought about average, ordinary Americans for years
now. And that is  

unsophisticated, 
rubes, 
uneducated. 

I mean, take any insult that you want.  

Appalling, 
stupid, 

you name it....

RUSH:...The problem, I think, with all of the conservative literary people at the magazines and websites and the columns and so forth who are writing so disparagingly of Trump and of his supporters and followers -- how best to say this? 

Well, they are establishment people, yeah, I know that, and what they're actually trying to do is engender support for the (Republican) party at the end of the day here. And anything that doesn't do that is considered damaging and threatening....And these people are all devoted to the Republicans winning because that...keeps the ruling class together, gives them their power and so forth.

But to me it's deeper than that, because many of the people that are complaining in their writing and in their columns and in their blog posts and so forth--I'm not trying to offend anyone, but all they do is write.  They comment, and that's it, as though that's an achievement in and of itself. There isn't any action that is inspired or suggested by all of it. And those are the people now complaining at the action that is taking place that's a direct result of events happening. People here supporting Trump are not supporting Trump 'cause they've been fooled or bamboozled or told to. It's because of real things happening in the country that apparently some don't see. 

RUSH:...Conservative principles. What good are they if all that's ever done with them is written about? What good are conservative principles if all anybody ever does is talk about it? What good are conservative principles if that's all they are, if there's no associated lifestyle? If there's no associated action, if there's no associated political objective with it, what good is it? I, for one, am tired of conservatism being nothing more than some intellectual feast every day....

What's happening with Trump...this is not about conservative principles. ....who has them and who doesn't and who's sacrificing them or who's giving them up or discarding them. What this is about is a whole lot of Americans thinking they had representation in Washington, and they've discovered they don't.... 
 
A political party has been campaigning promising to do X, Y, and Z and they've been getting voted for. They've been given majorities House and the Senate. But that's where it's all stopped, at the party level....

It's there, it's growing, and it's gonna continue to grow, as long as Washington remains unresponsive, which Washington appears to be more and more unresponsive as the days go by. So all these people that have got their underwear in a wad over people supporting Trump? They need to look in the mirror to explain why.  If they really want to know why all this is happening, they just have to look in the mirror. You can only tell people they're stupid and dumb so many times. 
 
You can only tell 'em they're unsophisticated so many times when they're staring the loss of their country in the face with this invasion illegal immigration and Obamacare and all of these executive orders that Obama's doing, and there's not a single ounce of apparent opposition to any of it! It's not about conservative principles, and these people that are writing about it in those terms are simply, I think, doing what they can to marginalize Trump and his supporters in an apparently convoluted effort to maintain support for the RINOs or the establishment or ruling class, whatever you want to call them. 

Anyway, I have to take a break. I want to get back to the phones here, folks. I could spend another 20 minutes explaining this, but I think you get it, at least my thoughts on this by now."

"END TRANSCRIPT" Image above from RushLimbaugh.com

.....................
====================





==========================

Bush vs Trump revealed when Jeb Bush allowed himself to be bullied by Black Lives Matters hecklers, providing evidence that as president he would cave to those who seek to override rights of others-Thomas Sowell

.
9/1/15, "BUSH VS. TRUMP: A REVEALING CLUE," Thomas Sowell, American Spectator

"Can someone be trusted to lead if he allows himself to be bullied?"

8/12/15, Las Vegas


"Even those of us who are not supporters of either Donald Trump or Jeb Bush can learn something by comparing how each of these men handled people who tried to disrupt their question-and-answer period after a speech. 

After Bush’s speech, hecklers from a group called “Black Lives Matter” caused Bush to simply leave the scene. When Trump opened his question-and-answer period by pointing to someone in the audience who had a question, a Hispanic immigration activist who had not been called on simply stood up and started haranguing. 

Trump told the activist to sit down because someone else had been called on. But the harangue continued, until a security guard escorted the disrupter out of the room. And Jeb Bush later criticized Trump for having the disrupter removed! 

What kind of president would someone make who caves in to those who act as if what they want automatically overrides other people’s rights--that the rules don’t apply to them? 

Trump later allowed the disrupter back in, and answered his questions. Whether Trump’s answers were good, bad, or indifferent is irrelevant to the larger issue of rules that apply to everyone. That was not enough to make “The Donald” a good candidate to become President of the United States. He is not. [Why not?] But these revealing incidents raise painful questions about electing Jeb Bush to be leader of the free world. The Republican establishment needs to understand why someone with all Trump’s faults could attract so many people who are sick of the approach that Jeb Bush represents. 

No small part of the internal degeneration of American society has been a result of supposedly responsible officials caving in to whatever group is currently in vogue, and allowing them to trample on everyone else’s rights. Some officials allow “the homeless” to urinate and defecate in public, right on the streets, or let organized hooligans who claim to represent “the 99 percent against the one percent” block traffic and keep neighborhoods awake with their noise through the night. Politicians who exempt from the law certain groups who have been chosen as mascots undermine the basis for a decent society--which everybody, from every group, deserves.

Even those who happen to be in vogue for the moment can lose big time when the vogue changes, as vogues do.

Back in the 1920s, when there was international outrage on the political left over the trial of anarchists Sacco and Vanzetti, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote to British leftist Harold Laski, pointing out that the trials of black defendants were far worse, but nobody seemed to care about that.

“I cannot but ask myself why this so much greater interest in red than black,” he said.

The vogue has changed since then--and it can change again, when some other group comes along that catches the fancy of the trend-setters, and sways politicians who go along to get along.

The goal of “the rule of law and not of men” has increasingly been abandoned in favor of government picking winners and losers. Too many in the media and in academia do the same.

Time and again, we have seen false charges of rape set off instant lynch mob reactions in the media and academia, regardless of how many previous false charges of rape have later been exposed as hoaxes.

The problem is not with the particular choices made as to whose interests are to override other people’s interests, but that picking winners and losers, in defiance of facts, is choosing a path that demoralizes a society, and leads to either a war of each against all or to a backlash of repression and revenge.

The recent televised murder of two media people by a black man who said that he wanted a “race war” was one sign of the madness of our times. Nobody who knows anything about the history of race wars, anywhere in the world, can expect anything good to come out of it. Unspeakable horrors have been the norm.

It is a long way from a couple of disruptive incidents on the political campaign trail to a race war. But these small incidents are just symptoms of larger and worse things that have already happened in America, when the rules have been routinely waived for some.

We do not need to risk still worse consequences if we get yet another President of the United States who acts as if it is just a question of whose ox is gored." 

Image above, 8/12/15, Jeb Bush and Black Lives Matter audience hecklers, screen shot from video, via Daily Mail

.................................................










8/12/15, "The former governor of Florida answered a question on racial inequality - sparking chants of 'Black Lives Matter' from members of the crowd," ap

"In a statement, his (Bush's) campaign team said they had spoken to members of the group before the rally."...  

8/12/15, "Jeb Bush forced to abandon rally early after activists start chanting 'Black Lives Matter'," UK Daily Mail, Wills Robinson

8/12/15
"Republican presidential hopeful Jeb Bush has been forced to abandon a rally early because of a protest from Black Lives Matter.

The former governor of Florida was in Las Vegas for a town hall meeting on Wednesday when he answered a question on racial inequality. 
An advocate in the crowd of around 150 then started to chant their slogan, so he quickly ended his speech and left the venue without making a final statement or shaking hands with members of the audience. 
The music he plays when he walks off stage is heard in the background of a video as the civil rights group keep shouting the mantra. 
It comes just four days after Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders suffered the same fate because of the group's actions during an appearance in Seattle. 
In the past week members have also turned up to one of Hillary Clinton's events. 
Bush was asked about the racial disparities in the criminal justice system that have been exaggerated by black men being killed by white police officers.
..........
He said that 'these problems have gotten worse in the last few years' and that communities 'no longer trust the basic institutions in our society that they need to trust,' according to CNN. 
...............
The GOP prospect then said 'perception becomes reality, and there really is racism in America'. 
................
Bush has received criticism from the Black Lives Matter movement. He backed Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley for telling protesters that 'all lives matter.'
.............
Image: "Black Lives Matter protesters invade Jeb Bush campaign event," UK Daily Mail screen shot from video
 


..............................

California may seek death penalty against illegal alien charged with murder, rape, and torture of 64 year old woman. Trail of blood begins in Washington DC says police chief

.
8/13/15, "Prosecutor may seek death penalty against undocumented worker accused of killing 64-year-old California woman," NY Daily News, Meg Wagner

"California prosecutors may seek the death penalty against an undocumented immigrant accused of raping a 64-year-old woman and bludgeoning her to death with a hammer.

Suspects Victor Martinez, a 29-year-old illegal immigrant, and Jose Fernando Villagomez, a 20-year-old legal resident. are charged in the deadly sexual assault of Marilyn Pharis.

Police said the two men broke into her Santa Maria home on July 24, raped her, brutally beat her with a claw hammer and then fled, leaving her for dead.

Pharis, an Air Force veteran who worked as a civilian at Vandenberg Air Force Base, died in a hospital about a week later as a result of her injuries.

Santa Barbara County District Attorney Joyce Dudley said her office has not yet decided if it will seek the death penalty for the murder charges against Martinez and Villagomez — but it is a possibility. She will base her decision on information from police, the victim’s family, and another lawyer, she told Fox News.

Martinez and Villagomez, who are expected to make a court appearance Thursday, face first-degree murder, mayhem, torture and rape charges.

The two were arrested when Pharis was still alive and recovering in a hospital. Martinez pleaded not guilty to charges of attempted murder, sexual assault and burglary charges before her Aug. 1 death. Then, both men were charged with murder.

Martinez has a long criminal history including six arrests in the past 15 months. The latest was on July 17, just eight days before the alleged attack on Pharis. He was booked into the Santa Barbara County jail on drug and weapons charges — but ordered released days later after he pleaded no contest, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Santa Maria Police Chief Ralph Martin put at least some of the blame on federal and California officials and national and state immigration policies.

“This is a national issue. I think it starts in Washington, D.C., with this administration that we see and these policies. I think you can draw a direct line over to Sacramento with the policies of, I'm going to say, this Governor and the Legislature,” he said Friday. “I am not remiss to say that from Washington, D.C., to Sacramento there's a blood trail leading to the bedroom of Marilyn Pharis.”

On Monday, presidential hopeful Donald Trump mentioned Pharis’ death while blasting the nation’s immigration system.

“Again, illegal immigrant is charged with the fatal  bludgeoning of a wonderful and loved 64 year old woman. Get them out and build a WALL!” he tweeted. “We must stop the crime and killing machine that is illegal immigration. Rampant problems will only get worse. Take back our country!”

Trump has used the deaths of several Americans killed by undocumented immigrants to advocate for stricter immigration laws. Notably, he called attention to the murder of Kate Steinle on a San Francisco pier last month.

Undocumented immigrant Francisco Sanchez has been charged in the shooting death of 32-year-old Steinle. Police said Sanchez randomly attacked her on a busy San Francisco pier.

“Where are the other candidates now that this tragic murder has taken place b/c of our unsafe border,” he tweeted shortly after the July shooting. “We need a wall!”"



........................................

Family of San Francisco woman killed by illegal alien files lawsuits against San Francisco Sheriff and US government, not only for Kate, 'for every citizen of this country who comes to San Francisco'

.
9/1/15, "Kate Steinle’s parents file legal claims against San Francisco, federal officials, in pier shooting death," NY Daily News, Deborah Hastings, Rachelle Blidner
"Kate Steinle's parents announced Tuesday they had filed legal claims against San Francisco and federal officials in connection to their daughter’s death, which sparked fierce national debate about immigration policies.

"We're here not only for Kate, we're here for every citizen of this country who comes to San Francisco," said Jim Steinle, Kate's father. "If you think this can't happen to you, think again.

Speaking to acrowd of reporters, Jim and his wife, Liz Sullivan, were joined by their son, Brad Steinle. The family said it had filed claims against San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, whose stolen gun was used in the shooting, the San Jose Mercury News reported.
...........
Kate Steinle was shot to death while going on a stroll with her dad at Pier 14 on July 1. She died in her father's arms.

"She said 'help me, help me.' That's my bedtime story every night," her dad said.

Family attorney Frank Pitrie said "What happened on Pier 14 was not only forseeable, it was preventable."

Katie's mother told reporters "This is for accountabiliity for public officials that we have voted for, who are not doing their job."

Her alleged killer, Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, a 45-year-old Mexican national, had been deported five times for multiple felonies. He had been held in a San Francisco jail in April and released when the charges were dropped because of the city's "sanctuary laws."

Sheriff Mirkarimi should have notified ICE when Lopez-Sanchez was released from jail, the Steinle family says.

His attorney said the shooting was accidental -- he found the .40-caliber gun on the pier by his feet and it accidentally went off. The firearm had been stolen from a Bureau of Land Management ranger during a car break-in in June.

Steinle's death prompted presidential candidates like Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton to weigh in on immigration reform. Her parents have been outspoken about the need for change, calling on legislative action at a senate judiciary hearing in July."




.................................


 

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Trump has 2-1 lead in Iowa at 31.7% per latest Gravis poll of Iowa caucus goers, Aug. 28-29, Fri-Sat. Carson 15.8, Bush 4.1. Trump dominant across demographic groups-Howie Carr, Breitbart

.
9/1/15, "Trump Now Out-polling Jeb 8-1 in Iowa," Howie Carr, Breitbart, Boston








"Donald Trump is maintaining a commanding 2-1 lead in the latest poll of GOP caucus goers in Iowa, and his only rival in double digits is another political novice, Dr. Ben Carson. Former frontrunner FL Gov. Jeb Bush has tumbled into eighth place despite his $100-million bankroll.

In a Gravis Marketing poll of 507 Iowa Republicans conducted last Friday and Saturday, Trump has 31.7 percent to Carson’s 15.8 and Bush’s 4.1 percent. A Monmouth University poll released yesterday had showed Trump and Carson running neck and neck with 23 percent – much to the excitement of the GOP establishment, including Fox News Channel.

But today’s Gravis poll seems more in line with other recent surveys in the Hawkeye State, where the first caucuses of 2016 will be held five months from today on Feb. 1.

Trump is dominant across almost all demographic groups, leading Carson and Cruz among Hispanics with 29 percent. He also won a plurality among GOP voters who described themselves as both pro-life and pro-choice, those in the 18-49 age group, and Republicans declaring themselves moderate or “slightly liberal.”

Among Roman Catholics in Iowa, the Presbyterian Trump polls 40 percent to 11 percent for Carson. Bush, a Catholic convert who often claims to be guided by his faith, polled at 0.8 percent among his coreligionists.

In Iowa, Trump trails only among evangelicals, with 13 percent to 26 percent for Carson and 22 percent for Cruz. Both Carson and Cruz are evangelicals themselves.... 

Iowa has open caucuses, which allow, say, Democrats or independents to declare themselves Republicans and vote on the GOP side. Of Trump’s declared supporters, 37 percent told Gravis they were Democrats, 37 percent independents, and only 26 percent Republicans."...Image above from Gravis via Howie Carr. No link to cross tabs.





...............................

Trump lead continues to grow per latest PPP national poll, Aug. 28-30, 2015, Fri-Sun. Trump at 29%, nearest competitor 15%-Public Policy Polling

.
9/1/15, "Trump Supporters Think Obama is a Muslim Born in Another Country," Public Policy Poll

"PPP's newest national poll finds Donald Trump just continuing to grow his lead over the GOP field. He is at 29% to 15% for Ben Carson, 9% for Jeb Bush, 8% for Carly Fiorina, 7% for Marco Rubio, 6% each for Ted Cruz and John Kasich, and 5% each for Mike Huckabee and Scott Walker. That group makes a pretty clear top 9."...

Donald Trump 29%
Ben Carson 15%
Jeb Bush 9
Fiorina 8
Rubio 7
Cruz 6
Kasich 6
Huckabee 5
Walker 5

"Public Policy Polling surveyed 572 usual Republican primary voters and 545 usual Democratic primary voters from August 28th to 30th. The margin of error for the Republicans is +/-4.1% and for the Democrats it’s +/-4.2%. 80% of participants responded via the phone, while 20% of respondents who did not have landlines 
conducted the survey over the internet." 
..............
====================
...............
Comment: PPP puts Obama's name in its headline though Obama isn't running in either the GOP or Democrat primary. Perhaps the company needs fantasy to assuage its pain.
.............

The Trump phenomenon and how he's changed the discourse-BBC

.
8/31/15, "Five ways Trump has changed the 2016 Republican presidential race," BBC, Anthony Zurcher, North American reporter

"Donald Trump isn't going away. As the recent Time magazine cover succinctly says: "Deal with it."



That's proving easier said than done for many Republican officials, political commentators and presidential hopefuls, however. Mr Trump has gone from joke to serious player in just a few months, thanks to his seemingly bulletproof level of Republican primary voter support and a trillion-dollar personal bank account to fuel his campaign, and he seems unwilling to play by standard political rules.

Here are just a few ways the Trump phenomenon has turned the Republican presidential nomination race on its head.




1. He's advancing a populist economic message

Tax-cutting and deregulation have been key parts of Republican orthodoxy since the days of Ronald Reagan. Mr Trump isn't reading from that particular hymnal, however. Instead he preaches a populist salvation for the economically disaffected. 

Poll after poll shows economic security is the most important issue for Republican voters, and Mr Trump's entire message - his anti-illegal-immigration stance, his condemnation of Chinese and Mexican trade practices, his calls for taxation of Wall Street hedge fund managers and his constant touting of his resume as a successful businessman and "job-creator" - is built around this. 

Earlier this year, as candidates made their appearances at various Republican forums across the country, it seemed the biggest applause lines among conservative audiences were warnings of the growing threat of the so-called Islamic State and condemnations of President Barack Obama's foreign policy. This would be a foreign policy election [6/11/15], wags opined, and the candidates all sharpened their rhetoric accordingly.

Then Mr Trump showed up, shrugged off questions of international affairs in favour of his jobs message and now sits at the top of the polls."...

[Ed. note: Not accurate. Mr. Trump has made numerous statements on international affairs. See end of this post.]

(continuing): "2. He's pumped up the volume on immigration.






Donald Trump has singlehandedly raised the decibel level of the Republican campaign. His seeming willingness to say whatever crosses his mind, no matter how impolitic, has cast him as an "authentic" contrast to the more measured - perhaps timid - actions of his competitors. 

Nowhere is this more clear than the current state of conversation on the issue of immigration, where the New York trillionaire has condemned illegal immigrants from Mexico as criminals and job-stealers.

Some candidates seem to have concluded that the way to beat Mr Trump is to be just as over-the-top as the Donald himself.

How else to explain Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker calling for consideration of a Canadian border wall? Or New Jersey Governor Chris Christie suggesting immigrants be tracked "like FedEx packages"? Or former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, who married a Mexican national, condemning "anchor babies" used to obtain US citizenship? Or Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, the child of Indian immigrants, repeatedly saying "immigration without assimilation is invasion"?

The year before the presidential primaries begin is supposed to be the time when candidates play the long game - building name recognition, avoiding missteps, establishing the rationale for their presidential aspirations and laying the groundwork for future success. Mr Trump's headline-dominating juggernaut is throwing all of that to the wind.

3. He's stepped over Walker

If there is one of Trump opponents who most reflects the adverse effect the New Yorker has had on the field, it's Mr Walker. 

Up until now, the governor's appeal has been as the mild-mannered "aggressively normal" Mid-westerner who successfully advanced a solidly conservative agenda in left-leaning Wisconsin. He's been billed as the establishment-endorsed man who also boasts crossover grassroots appeal.

When compared to Mr Trump, however, "aggressively normal" seems decidedly milquetoast. For months Mr Walker was the man to beat in first-in-the-nation voting Iowa, but recent polls have him dropping to the middle of the pack, as Mr Trump and other unorthodox candidates like retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson have flourished.

That's left Walker supporters and advisors calling for a campaign reboot, while the candidate tries to grab headlines by calling for the cancellation of an upcoming US visit by Chinese President Xi Jinping and seemingly endorsing, then backing away from, ending the practice of automatically granting citizenship to all children born on US soil.

"What happened to Scott Walker?" asks the headline of a recent Washington Post piece - in the type of soul-searching article that often greets campaigns on a downward trajectory.

Donald Trump. That's what happened.

4. He's weaponised social media

Last week Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo wrote that Mr Trump is disrupting conventional political campaigns the way General William T Sherman's US Civil War strategies revolutionised the military.

Sherman cut through the South with a speed and agility that left his opponents reeling. Mr Trump, thanks to his deft use of social media-based attacks on multiple, often seemingly contradictory fronts, is doing the same to his political opponents.

"You need to be able to not just act fast but act fast again and again to control the tempo and pace of the news conversation so you're on to the next punch or the one after that before your adversaries have even responded," he writes. "You also need to be experienced in the tabloid news culture and be totally in tune with your target audience. All of these combined are allowing Trump to act faster and thus more totally dominate the progression of the news conversation than any candidate has ever."

Up until now, social media has essentially been a public relations arm of a political campaign, subject to the same careful vetting and control that goes into a candidate's public speeches and position statements.

Mr Trump is operating more like a pop culture celebrity, however, picking fights and tossing casual insults at furious pace. He's a spider monkey in a fight with tortoises.

And, at least so far, it's working for him.

5. He's fomenting a Republican civil war

Mr Trump's rise is exposing the fault lines within the Republican Party between rank-and-file conservatives and the party's governing elite. 

Rick Wilson, a long-time Republican political strategist, was one of the first to launch an anti-Trump salvo, with an article in Politico urging the candidate's supporters to come to their senses.

"The circus is almost over," he wrote. "My advice to Trump fans? Don't be the last clown out of the tent."

As Mr Trump support continued to endure despite much-touted "game-changing" gaffes, the barbs directed his way turned sharper still.

"Every sulfurous belch from the molten interior of the volcanic Trump phenomenon injures the chances of a Republican presidency," wrote establishment scion George Will of the Washington Post.

Meanwhile, grassroots conservative commentators like Breitbart's John Nolte relentlessly hammer the party "smart set" for what they see as its denigration of loyal voters who support Mr Trump.

"Listen, I'm no highly-paid, inside-inside strategist, but maybe - just maybe - instead of dismissing, marginalising, attacking, and attempting to disenfranchise Trump's supporters, the GOP could try to figure out what his appeal is and make their own appeal to those voters?" he writes.

The level of debate has descended from there, ending in an obscenity-laden Twitter war of words between Nolte, Wilson and several other conservative commentators.

All of this has some on the right wondering if the ground within their party is shifting.

"Could it be that the conservative movement is no longer driven by a coalition of fiscal conservatives, people of faith, and those concerned about foreign policy, but instead is driven by a coalition consisting of working class whites, blue collar populists, and anti-immigration hawks?" the Daily Caller's Matt K Lewis asks.

The thing is, such paradigm-shifting developments usually don't happen quietly or smoothly. Those in power want to stay there, while those aspiring to power are eager to claim it. The recent Trump television advert hitting Mr Bush for being soft on immigrant criminals is only the latest example.

And if it all seems acrimonious now, just wait to see what happens if Mr Trump starts winning primaries and caucuses next year." Images above getty via BBC.

....................................... 

Comment: To BBC author, for your reference, following are examples of Mr. Trump's views on international affairs which he by no means "shrugs off" as you suggest. These are from,"Donald Trump IOWA FULL SPEECH in IOWA, Dubuque - August 25, 2015," CNN feed. I've included approximate times. (As to foreign policy per se, most agree it's best conducted by actual nations. As Mr. Trump has said, a nation without borders isn't a nation.)

1. (34:15)-We don't give aid to the Kurds. We give aid to the wrong people. We give our enemies Humvees that are chrome plated. Humvees we give to our own soldiers aren't chrome plated.
2. (36:35)-A retired US general on TV said, Uh, I don't know if we can beat ISIS. That wouldn't happen under Pres. Trump.
3. (39:55), Trump mentions that Afghanistan is rich in various minerals and that China has been given rights to mine them. It doesn't make sense that Americans fight and die there as they have for over a dozen years but another country is given the mining business. 
4. (33-34min.) He wants the strongest military possible so we never have to use it.
5. (38:00) He has repeatedly stated we shouldn't have gone into Iraq, that the Iraqi government is totally corrupt. We killed and maimed Americans, spent trillions of taxpayer dollars, and Iraq is worse than ever. Trump favors a more selective use of the military than recent decades have seen.
6. (30:15) He asks why do we have fighters going into Ukraine? The US shouldn't be there.
7. (31:59) He asks why does the US have 28,000 troops in South Korea? 
8. (32:15)-If Japan is attacked, we have to help them. They don't have to help us.
9. (33:30)-We protect Saudi Arabia for nothing. 

-----------------------------


Added: Foreign policy is best conducted not by amoebic land masses but by actual nations. As Mr. Trump states, a nation without borders isn't a nation. From Trump immigration reform positions released 8/16/15,  Donald J Trump.com: "Immigration Reform That Will Make America Great Again."

"Here are the three core principles of real immigration reform: 

1. A nation without borders is not a nation. There must be a wall across the southern border.
2. A nation without laws is not a nation. Laws passed in accordance with our Constitutional system of government must be enforced.
3. A nation that does not serve its own citizens is not a nation. Any immigration plan must improve jobs, wages and security for all Americans." 

Added from Diana West:  

8/18/15, "Trump: Giving Voice to the American "Subconscious"," Diana West

"To say the Media-Political Complex has really lost its cool over Donald Trump, also every marble, is barest understatement....


Before Trump, the American "subconscious," circa 2015, would never "originally think" a US border was possible, let alone a wall; immigration restriction was possible, let alone a halt; immigration law enforcement was possible; the deportation of illegal families was possible; restoration of American citizenship as a privilege, not a stolen good, was possible; jobs for Americans were possible; and the rest. Donald Trump, bless him, has changed the American subconscious, giving voice to Americans long conditioned into silence by this same Media-Political Complex. And there is nothing, but nothing, they can do about it now." 


================= 
===================

2014 citation regarding Afghan mineral wealth: US taxpayers kindly financed extensive mapping of mineral locations throughout the country.  Lucrative mining contracts were then won by Chinese and Indian governments--not the US:

9/5/14, "Rare Earth: Afghanistan Sits on $1 Trillion in Minerals," nbcnews.com, Charles Q. Choi, LiveScience


"Despite being one of the poorest nations in the world, Afghanistan may be sitting on one of the richest troves of minerals in the world, valued at nearly $1 trillion, scientists say. 


Afghanistan, a country nearly the size of Texas, is loaded with minerals deposited by the violent collision of the Indian subcontinent with Asia. The U.S. Geological Survey began inspecting what mineral resources Afghanistan had after U.S.-led forces drove the Taliban from power in the country in 2004. 



In 2006, U.S. researchers flew airborne missions to conduct magnetic, gravity and hyperspectral surveys over Afghanistan. [Infographic: Facts About Rare Earth Minerals] 


The aerial surveys determined that Afghanistan may hold 60 million tons of copper, 2.2 billion tons of iron ore, 1.4 million tons of rare earth elements such as lanthanum, cerium and neodymium, and lodes of aluminum, gold, silver, zinc, mercury and lithium. For instance, the Khanneshin carbonatite deposit in Afghanistan's Helmand province is valued at $89 billion, full as it is with rare earth elements. 
"Afghanistan is a country that is very, very rich in mineral resources," geologist Jack Medlin, program manager of the USGS Afghanistan project, told LiveScience. The scientists' work was detailed in the Aug. 15 issue of the journal Science. 

In 2010, the USGS data attracted the attention of the U.S. Department of Defense's Task Force for Business and Stability Operations, which is entrusted with rebuilding Afghanistan. The task force valued Afghanistan's mineral resources at $908 billion, while the Afghan government's estimate is $3 trillion.


Over the past four years, USGS and TFBSO have embarked on dozens of excursions to confirm the aerial findings, resulting in what are essentially treasure maps for mining companies. 

The Afghan government has already signed a 30-year, $3 billion contract with the China Metallurgical Group, a state-owned mining enterprise based in Beijing, to exploit the Mes Aynak copper deposit, and awarded mining rights for the country's biggest iron deposit to a group of Indian state-run and private companies."
.........................
================

2013 NY Times: US is biggest source of corruption in Afghanistan:
 
““The biggest source of corruption in Afghanistan," one American official said, "was the  United States.""...4/28/2013, NY Times

.........

..................................  
3/10/15, "Afghans can't manage billions in aid, U.S. inspector finds," Bloomberg,

"The Pentagon has provided $3.3 billion in payments to Afghan ministries since October 2010, and an additional $13 billion in such military aid is projected through 2019, three years after President Barack Obama has pledged to withdraw all but a small number of U.S. troops."...



====================

Comment #2: For the BBC author and Daily Caller, we have Donald Trump today because our first priority is the United States, not ideology:

9/7/15, "Traitor to His Class," Julius Krein, Weekly Standard

"Trump shows that what is most in demand, however, is not ideological purity but patriotic zeal....

What Trump offers is permission to conceive of an American interest as a national interest separate from the “international community”....

Nothing is more terrifying to the elite than Trump’s embrace of a tangible American nationalism....The critical question, however, is not the source of Trump’s popularity but rather the reason his popularity is so shocking to our political culture....

Trump alone appears to understand that politics is more than policy and ideology."...

-------------------------------- 

Added: Millions of Americans have been treated like garbage by both political parties for many years. Donald Trump apparently doesn't think this is right and is at a point in his life when he can do something about it. As to power, after two terms as president, he'll be closing in on age 80. It's unlikely he'll be looking to cash in on a corner office on K St.



.................
.............................