.
“No BRICS country signed the Bürgenstock Forum communiqué”...“If actually a sovereign state, Ukraine would have refused to receive Biden. But it seems that for the Kiev regime friendly backslappings by the U.S. boss are more important than their country’s national interests.”…1/17/2017, “Farewell tour of “old Joe”: Biden’s last visit to Ukraine,” eadaily.com
6/17/24, “[Puppet] Zelenski’s Summit Has Failed,“ Moon of Alabama
“The reviews of [Puppet] Zelenski’s latest show ain’t positive:
- Russia’s ghost loomed over Ukraine peace summit – Politico.eu
- In Ukraine, soldiers and civilians shrug off Zelensky’s summit – AFP
- Ukraine’s Global Diplomatic Flurry Fails to Outflank Russia (archived) – WSJ
- Significant support for Ukraine at peace summit – but key nations hesitate – Sky News
- India opts out of Ukraine declaration at Swiss peace summit as Russia stays away [not invited]- India Today
- Major Ukraine summit ends with fresh plea for peace but key powers spurn final agreement – CNN
- Disappointing end to Ukraine summit as allies agree to watered-down peace declaration – Telegraph
The summit served warmed up bullshit without any significant nutritional value. The most important points weren’t even discussed:
Arnaud Bertrand @RnaudBertrand – 8:48 UTC · Jun 17, 2024…Genuinely astonishing how the final communiqué of Swiss “Summit on Peace in Ukraine” (link) is basically 6 out of the 12 points of China’s February 2023 “Peace plan” (link), and only that.
In short it’s the Chinese peace plan, without:
- A call for a cessation of hostilities
- A call to resume peace talks.
- A call to “abandon the Cold War mentality”
- A call to resolve the humanitarian crisis.
- An agreement to remove “unilateral sanctions”
- An agreement to support post-conflict reconstruction
The only points it keeps from the Chinese peace plan are:
- Point 1: To base the resolution of the conflict on the UN Charter
- Point 6: Asking that all prisoners of war and detainees should be released
- Points 7 & 8: Calling for nuclear plants to be safe and stating that nuclear weapons shouldn’t be used
- Points 9 & 11: Asking that food security and supply chains be maintained and be weaponized
And that’s almost 1 year and a half AFTER the Chinese Peace Plan, which the West rejected immediately out of hand and ironically criticized as being “vague” even though the outcome of this Swiss summit is now far vaguer, in fact it’s so vague it removed all the aspects of the Chinese plan that actually proposed a path to a sustainable peace …
Just goes to show how far away we are from peace, almost 2 years and a half into the war… And also goes to show that maybe, just maybe, China’s proposal wasn’t so bad after all 😏
As Strana summarizes (machine translation):
The final declaration included a clause on the need to involve “all parties” in the negotiations, which can be interpreted as a desire to involve the Russian Federation in future summits. This was stated by many participants of the summit (primarily from the countries of the “global South”). Zelensky also said about his desire to see Russia at the second summit, saying that Russia’s presence there would mean that it “wants peace.” But given the complete discrepancy in the positions of the parties regarding how they see the end of the war, it is still very early to talk about any negotiations. These positions may become closer under the influence of two factors-the situation on the battlefield and / or coordinated pressure on both belligerents by their key international partners. And only in the case of such a convergence of positions will real negotiations become possible.
The war will continue until the complete destruction of the Ukrainian forces can no longer be ignored.”
Posted by b on June 17, 2024 at 13:06 UTC | Permalink
[Above photo AFP via Zero Hedge, 6/17/2024]
“And something went wrong at
this supposedly global conference from the very beginning.
The date of the event was postponed five times
because the countries of Asia and the Global South were not prepared to sign the so-called “Zelensky Peace Formula”.
seven of the ten points were deleted.”
………………………………………………………..
Among comments to above: Comment #22
“The collective West (US and NATO) do not have the capacity to fight a land war with Russia.
They “keep saying that somehow the West doesn’t understand the situation and so acts foolishly.
I suggest that the West understands the situation very well. The West knows it cannot fight a conventional war as it will lose and lose badly.
That’s why the West is planning a nuclear attack.
A face flag event will probably be staged before the American election in November. That’s why the recent probe to disable Russia’s nuclear early warning radar.
It’s worth noting what Goering once mentioned:
“Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along,
whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.
The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and
denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger.
It works the same way in any country.”
Posted by: DenisSaintDenis | Jun 17 2024 15:36 utc | 22″
****************************
Comment #56
team10tim | Jun 17 2024 15:23 utc | 19
“Which countries didn’t sign? I‘ve seen some mentioned, India, South Africa, Mexico, etc. But I’ve not seen the list of all twelve anywhere.”
According to this, the [8] countries that were at the summit but didn’t sign are:
– Armenia (3,000,000 people)
– Bahrain (1,500,000 people)
– Brazil (205,000,000 people)
– United Arab Emirates (9,300,000 people)
– India (1,428,000,000 people)
– Indonesia (279,000,000 people)
– Saudi Arabia (32,000,000 people)
– South Africa (62,000,000 people)
That’s 8. Don’t know, but are you sure Mexico was even there? [If it was it didn’t sign.]
Cheers!
[Iraq and Jordan also said to have been present but didn’t sign, per #60]
Posted by: Scotch Bingeington | Jun 17 2024 19:05 utc | 56″
…………………………………………………….
Comment #60
“james | Jun 17 2024 19:18 utc | 58
Thanks James!
So with Iraq (46,000,000 people) and Jordan (11,000,000 people) that’s 10 countries who thought better of it. What a huge success for Zelensky!
Posted by: Scotch Bingeington | Jun 17 2024 19:38 utc | 60″
……………………………………………
Above photo AFP via Zero Hedge, 6/17/2024
Added: “The idea behind the action was to display a forest of flags, a joint photo in the center of which Zelensky and the head of his office Ermak, through whom the West controls Ukraine, were positioned on either side of the Swiss President….And something went wrong at this supposedly global conference from the very beginning. The date of the event was postponed five times because the countries of Asia and the Global South were not prepared to sign the so-called “Zelensky Peace Formula.” As a result, seven of the ten points were deleted.”
6/17/24, “The political week in Europe: “You can’t sit out your own voters”,” anti-spiegel, Thomas Roper
“The last political week in Europe consisted of a sobering European election, a G7 summit that Politico wrote was the meeting of perhaps the weakest politicians in years,
and the failed conference in Switzerland. But not of the question of what the voters want.
Despite all the economic and social problems in Europe,
the European elites
are completely focused on Ukraine and not on their own voters,
which was clearly evident in the result of the European elections, in which the “evil” right-wingers won despite all efforts and smear campaigns by the media.
For the German correspondent of Russian television, who has a completely different view of the past political week in Germany and Europe than the German media in the weekly news review on Russian television every Sunday, this was material for a fairly long report from Europe, which I translated as I do every week.
Start of translation:
“The meeting on the Bürgenstock [Swiss resort] ended in a flop.
Switzerland, the Bürgenstock Resort Hotel on the high shore of Lake Lucerne. A great holiday destination for the wealthy, but not very suitable for global political decisions. Not because of the conditions of the event, but because of the concept.
What was thought to be a “peace summit” in the West
turned out to be a meeting of US allies
with a few spectators.
Switzerland has given up its political neutrality.
Viola Amherd, the Swiss President, said unexpectedly: “Undermining respect for international law is not only damaging to Russia, but to everyone in the long run. If we want to initiate a peace process, Russia must also be included at some point. That is clear to everyone.”
However, Russia’s absence was the main condition for organizing the conference, as the Swiss Foreign Minister admitted.
The idea behind the action was
[Above photo AFP via Zero Hedge, 6/17/2024]
of which Zelensky and the head of his office Ermak, through whom the West controls Ukraine, were
positioned on either side of the Swiss President.
All this was intended to push Russia to the emotional wall:
supposedly this is what the whole world is demanding.
Meanwhile, Ukrainian propaganda resorted to the cheapest manipulations to keep its own population on board.
Italian Prime Minister Meloni said: “If Ukraine could not count on our support and therefore had to capitulate, we would not be here today.”
And here is what Ukrainian viewers of the live broadcast heard from their simultaneous interpreter:
“If Russia does not accept the conditions,
we [at the “peace” summit] will force it to surrender!”
This is happening quite deliberately,
the entire Bandera regime is based on lies and distortions of the facts.
There is no other way.
And something went wrong at
this supposedly global conference from the very beginning.
The date of the event was postponed five times
because the countries of Asia and the Global South were not prepared to sign the so-called “Zelensky Peace Formula”.
seven of the ten points were deleted,
leaving only food security, nuclear security and prisoner exchange.
For the sake of attractiveness, they even accepted having to listen to something that in no way fits into their current coordinate system: “In order for us to be able to determine that the summit is effective,
it would be very important that we can ensure that the second party, Russia, is present in this room,” said Hakan Fidan, the Turkish foreign minister.
And Faisal Ibn Farah Al Saud, the Saudi foreign minister, added: “It is very important that the international community supports all possible steps to resolve the conflict. Even if this requires some compromises, this is why Russia’s participation is also necessary.”
Of the 92 national delegations, only 57 – the USA and its henchmen – were represented at the level of heads of government or their deputies. And they tried their best to compensate for the effect of the calls to listen to Russia too. French President Macron and Spanish Prime Minister Sanchez were convinced that Russia was the aggressor and the Ukrainian people were the victims. The international community must stand by Ukraine, demanded von der Leyen. During World War II, Russia attacked Finland and took away ten percent of its territory as well as his grandfather’s land, Finnish President Stubb revealed the roots of his own Russophobia. Before the war in Ukraine, there was the war in Georgia, recalled Georgian President and French citizen Zurabishvili, without going into detail about how this war started.
that Russia has not gone through the process of decolonization and is unable to cope with the demons of the past,
said Polish President Duda, summarizing the historical and philosophical basis
for the strategy of dismembering Russia.
Here, even doubters should have recognized
that this was a “purely peaceful conference.”
Russia simply had to capitulate. And dissolve. But how could one persuade it to do so?
Chancellor Scholz said: “It is true that peace in Ukraine cannot be achieved without Russia’s involvement. But let us not forget that at the moment Russia is still relentlessly waging its brutal war. We all know that Russia can end this war today or at any other time as soon as it stops its offensive and withdraws its troops from Ukraine. To date, Russia has refused to heed our joint call for peace on the basis of international law and the UN Charter.”
If it is useful to them, they remember the UN Charter,
if not, they forget its existence.
A part of the audience was particularly irritated by the conditions set by Vladimir Putin under which Russia is ready to cease hostilities: withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the four Russian regions and a neutral status for Ukraine. The collective West found this unacceptable.
Kamala Harris, the US Vice President, said: “And nothing about ending this war should be decided without Ukraine. But yesterday Putin made a proposal to the contrary. But we must tell the truth. He is not calling for negotiations. He is calling for surrender.
America is standing with Ukraine not out of mercy,
but because it is in our strategic interest.”
America [in 2014 violently] drove Ukraine into war
because it was in its strategic interest.
A refreshing openness.
Putin’s peace proposal was aimed primarily at the hesitant participants in the Swiss event, those who had come because they had bowed to pressure but were banking on diplomacy. Everyone, big and small, must accept reality as it is: without taking Russia’s position into account, any talk of peace becomes talk of war.
Hence the result, about which Bloomberg writes: “Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky
failed to win over a number of key countries in the global south
after the two-day summit in Switzerland,
casting a shadow over his attempt to win broader support.”
The conference’s final declaration
Armenia, Bahrain, Brazil, the United Arab Emirates,
India, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and South Africa –
which have populations twice as large as the signatory states.
However, [US puppet] Zelensky for some reason assumes that Russia is interested in the piece of paper. “When the action plan is on the table, everyone agrees and it is transparent for the peoples,
it will be presented to the Russian representatives so that
at the second peace summit we can determine the real end of the war,”
Zelensky fantasized.
Until the last moment, the Ukrainian delegation tried to push through the clause on the 1991 border, but the leaders of the Kiev regime considered it too risky for the Swiss venture. This does not mean that they have given up on the scenario. Perhaps one day the West will put all this nonsense out of its head, but it is unlikely that these politicians will do so.
Many of them simply have no time left.
From Thursday to Friday of this week, the G7 summit took place in Puglia, on the heel of the Italian boot. As Meloni explained, to be closer to the global south. The host of the summit received her guests in an oversized pink outfit that the press compared to curtains. In terms of political sustainability, however,
Meloni was the one who deserved the least ridicule in this society.
Politico wrote: “Six lame ducks and Meloni: These are the 2024 G7 leaders. This G7 summit is more of a secret dinner than a demonstration of Western power. The G7 summit will be a meeting of perhaps the weakest politicians in years. With the exception of Meloni, all the politicians at the G7 summit are pretty weak. Trudeau is unlikely to win the next election. Biden faces a tough election race. Scholz is weakened.
Macron is weakened. Sunak is ‘dead man walking’ and Kishida also has serious domestic problems.”
Politico forgot to mention Charles Michel and Ursula von der Leyen, the EU’s top officials who are also in limbo after the European Parliament elections.
But they also genuinely hate each other.
Meanwhile, Zelensky was hanging around somewhere backstage. He was dealing with Biden because
he and the US president wanted to conclude a 10-year agreement on security guarantees [on the backs of US taxpayers].
Earlier this week, NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg said that
in order for Ukraine to join NATO, it would have to at least defeat Russia.
And since that is impossible, Western power brokers are
signing all sorts of papers with Kyiv that, firstly,
commit no one to anything and, secondly,
depend on the political longevity of those who provide these guarantees:
in this case, the Biden administration.
Biden read from a piece of paper:
“A lasting peace for Ukraine must be underpinned by Ukraine’s ability to defend itself now and to deter future aggression at any time. The United States will help ensure that Ukraine can do both. Not by sending American troops to Ukraine, but by providing weapons and ammunition, by expanding intelligence sharing,
and by continuing to train brave Ukrainian soldiers
at bases in Europe and the United States.”
As a result of the summit, the G7 is trying to increase pressure on the Russian economy by tightening controls on the sanctions regime and
imposing secondary sanctions on countries that dare to cooperate with Russia.
The US has brought Europe to its knees: since July 1, the EU has imposed tariffs on Chinese electric cars amounting to up to 38 percent of their value. Brussels has tried to avoid a direct link to China’s Russia policy. But of course the anti-Russian sanctions and the trade war with China are phenomena of the same kind – they are attempts to maintain the economic dominance that is slipping away from them.
But the dollar’s monopoly is coming to an end, because it is becoming increasingly difficult to turn on the printing press to cover one’s own military expenditures,
to wage wars and
to finance color revolutions around the world.
is becoming an increasingly attractive solution.
Biden threatened: “We took three important steps at the G7 summit that, taken together, showed Putin that he cannot out-sit us. The first is the bilateral security agreement that we just signed.
Second, the
historic agreement to provide Ukraine with $50 billion in [stolen] Russian state funds.
And third, the agreement that our sanctions will impact third countries that supply Russian forces.”
The plan is as follows: the
Americans provide Kiev with a [so-called] loan of $50 billion,
are transferred to the status of financial collateral.
The interest on the loan is repaid from the proceeds of their reinvestment. In this scheme,
the Americans get the money because
it goes into their military-industrial complex,
while Europe assumes all the risks and suffers reputational losses.
Somewhere, Belgian Prime Minister De Croo is crying, because it is
a Belgian depot where Russian billions are stored.
Before the G7 summit, Politico quoted a European diplomat, without naming names, as saying that the Americans thought they were stupid, but they were not. No, they are stupid, as it turns out.
Olaf Scholz warned: “This is a clear signal to the Russian president
that he cannot just sit back
and hope that he can win this war at some point
because some of the countries in the world that are now supporting Ukraine
are having financial problems.”
Rishi Sunak, the British Prime Minister, encouraged open theft: “We
have agreed a new $50 billion loan for Ukraine,
which will be repaid
not at the expense of our taxpayers but
generated from frozen Russian assets
in Europe and around the world. That is fair and right.”
Sunak is nicknamed “old bread” because nobody needs him anymore.
Macron, disconnected from international politics, can’t talk about anything other than the early parliamentary elections.
Biden is frankly not doing well, suffering from spinal arthritis and progressive dementia. Meloni kept an eye on the US president at the summit to make sure he didn’t run off somewhere, perhaps to another meeting with Chancellor Adenauer.
What was he talking about when he pressed his forehead against the Pope’s? Did he confess? Quickly, without remorse? In the background, the camera caught the face of Argentine President Miley,
Zelensky’s rival in the fight for Western loans.
He had an expression on his face as if he was seeing something indecent. Did Francis absolve Joe of his sins or not? He probably did. But we don’t know for sure.
Scholz’s 66th birthday was not very funny. One could even say sad. His country is fed up with the Chancellor. And when something like that happens, electoral defeats follow.
The German Social Democrats received less than 15 percent in the European Parliament elections, and the other two coalition parties, the Greens and the Free Democrats, received even less.
Markus Söder said: “Basically, this government is at its end. And now the same thing should happen as in France. There were calls for early elections and Macron has announced them. Our country needs a new beginning. The traffic light coalition no longer has a mandate, no longer has the trust of the population.”
“We have achieved a great result! We are the second strongest force in Germany and the first in the east of our country,” rejoiced Alice Weidel, co-chair of the AfD.
In the east, the AfD even has a total advantage over the Christian Democrats. The border of voting preferences
clearly divides the country into two parts.
Without Berlin, the capital has always had a special history, there is
the old Federal Republic of Germany, which voted for the Christian Democrats,
and the GDR, the AfD’s fiefdom.
The map looks like it did before German reunification.
The right-wing AfD and the left-wing Sarah Wagenknecht movement are
the two political forces that have seen the greatest growth compared to the last election.
The latter [left wing] is only five months old, and if elections were held now, it would be elected to the Bundestag. The AfD and the “movement”
they do not agree with the official policy towards Russia
and with the arms deliveries to Ukraine.
A German government would probably have agreed to this demand in the past,
but the current one can no longer do so.
Scholz came up with a way to keep Zelensky busy this week so that he would not have to return to Kyiv between the end of the anniversary celebrations in Normandy and the start of the G7 summit in Italy. The break was bridged with a conference on the reconstruction of Ukraine.
But as Scholz himself said,
you have to end the war before you can talk about reconstruction,
and so it all turned out to be just another round of promises that are impossible to fulfill from the start.
“When we talk about rebuilding Ukraine, we are talking about rebuilding a new future member of the EU,”
Scholz again waved
the carrot in front of Zelensky’s nose.
The head of the EU Commission, who was present for the sake of solidity, immediately promised that negotiations on Ukraine’s accession to the EU would begin this month, i.e. before the Hungarian EU Council Presidency, which will certainly try to block any attempts in this direction.
The topic of rebuilding Ukraine has been reduced to the promise of regular supplies of
weapons and ammunition,
but the German side has slowed down on the Patriot anti-aircraft systems. Zelensky demanded seven batteries, Germany has already allocated two and the third is on the way, but that is all for now. They do not have enough themselves.
The [German] Ministry of Defense is preparing the country for war. Minister Pistorius confirmed this week that Russia will be able to attack one of the NATO countries in 2029. The Bundeswehr urgently needs to be expanded.
The First German Television has started a special news program for people with perception difficulties, which make up almost a fifth of the population in Germany, but there could also be recruits among them. The new version of the Tagesschau said:
“The Bundeswehr is looking for young people to become soldiers.
That is why the Bundeswehr is advertising in Germany. The Bundeswehr says
we are looking for girls and boys.
The Minister of Defense is this man here. The minister is called Pistorius. Pistorius says young men should join the Bundeswehr voluntarily.
He does not want to force the young people.”
Not yet. So far, the Defense Ministry plans to send questionnaires to 400,000 young men and women
to determine their attitudes toward military service.
Those who respond positively will be drafted into the army for up to 12 months. Germany needs a trained reserve
so that it has someone to fight Russia
when it runs out of Ukrainians by 2029.
The government factions applauded,
the opposition CDU, Germany’s largest party, applauded,
confirming suspicions that the new CDU-led government will not change its policy towards Russia in early elections.
The AfD and the “movement” were not in the hall.
Meanwhile, AfD’s Steffen Kotre said: “The moment when President Zelensky is speaking in the Bundestag is definitely a sophisticated event,
a circus performance to get German money.
We Germans have been ripped off once again.
This whole pleasure, together with the sanctions, is currently costing us 250 billion euros.”
Germans can count. Especially when it comes to money. Especially their own.
It is annoying that the Scholz government has stopped counting it,
but despite the defeat the Chancellor is expecting to sit out the rest of his term. Apparently to save face, not power. But that is a challenge, because
in September [2024] there will be elections in the east, in Brandenburg, Thuringia and Saxony, where the Social Democrats have little chance. This coalition will hardly survive another defeat.
The political storm that began after the European Parliament elections is far from over. And so far two things have become clear:
first, the European elite has failed to portray Russia as the source of all problems, and
second, to achieve public consolidation in this area,
Scholz, Sunak, Macron and others hope to sit out Russia.
But you can’t sit out your own voters.”
………………………………
“End of translation”
******************************
“No BRICS country signed the Bürgenstock Forum communiqué.”
Added: Iraq, Jordan, and Rwanda remove signatures from Swiss/Ukraine agreement:
6/17/24, “Iraq and Jordan withdraw their signatures from the communiqué after the summit in Switzerland,” anti-spiegel.com
BÜRGENSTOCK /Switzerland/, June 16./ “The number of countries supporting the final communiqué of the Bürgenstock conference on Ukraine has fallen from 80 to 78. The organizers of the forum have removed Jordan and Iraq from the list of supporters of the document adopted at the forum, which they had originally published and which does not take into account Russia’s opinion.
The organizers have not yet explained the reasons for these changes to the list.
This brings to 15 the number of countries that have refused to support the final document calling for the transfer of sovereignty over the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant to Ukraine: Armenia, Bahrain, Brazil, Colombia, Iraq, India, Indonesia, Jordan, Libya, Mexico, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Thailand, South Africa and the Vatican.”
***************************
Added:
6/18/24, “Rwanda has withdrawn its signature from the Bürgenstock Communiqué,” anti-spiegel
“The document states that Ukrainian nuclear power plants and facilities, including the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant, should operate “under the full sovereign control of Ukraine.” According to the communiqué, access to the seaports on the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov is “extremely important” for ensuring food security….
No BRICS country signed the Bürgenstock Forum communiqué.…
Delegations from less than half of the UN members were present at the forum. Among others,
Azerbaijan, Belarus, China, Cuba, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Venezuela were absent.”…
*****************************
Added: 6/17/24, “Stoltenberg: Two thirds of European military spending goes to the USA for arms contracts,” anti-spiegel
“Over the past two years, their volume has amounted to 140 billion dollars, said NATO Secretary General.
WASHINGTON, June 17./ Two-thirds of European countries’ defense spending on new orders in the United States, their volume has reached 140 billion dollars in the last two years, said NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg
in a speech at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington.
“Today, more than 20 NATO countries spend more than 2 percent on defense.
And most of this money goes to the United States.
In the last two years, two-thirds of this money has been used for defense contracts in the United States, about $140 billion,” Stoltenberg told the audience,
pointing out the importance of NATO for the United States.”
**************************
Added: “The Pentagon had previously confirmed that the administration of US President Joe Biden had accepted the possibility of attacks with US weapons on Russian territory as part of a defensive war.”
6/13/24, “Cameron names condition for stopping attacks with Western weapons on Russia,” anti-spiegel
British Foreign Secretary David Cameron said at
a press conference for a group of foreign journalists in London….
The Pentagon had previously confirmed that the administration of US President Joe Biden had accepted the
possibility of attacks with US weapons on Russian territory as part of a defensive war.
According to the New York Times, the decision came into force on May 30.
As Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council, wrote in his Telegram channel on May 31, Moscow believes that all long-range weapons supplied to Ukraine “will be directly operated by soldiers of NATO countries.” According to him,
this is “in no way military support,” but rather
“participation in the war” against the Russian Federation.”
“Translation from the Russian news agency TASS”
************************
*************************
Susan’s comment: US has normalized genocide. Thus, US voters have no “peace” or “neutrality” candidate with a platform of ending all US taxpayer funded military, ancillary military “support,” including US military construction outside US border. “Their blood, our bullets” is considered normal. A lawsuit must immediately be filed to stop US taxpayer funding of “independent” militias such as Azov Battalion. Defund NED--instead of increasing funding as Trump did in Dec. 2019.
A “neutral US candidate” would travel to all so-called “summits”
that assume US taxpayer funded military
or shipment of US war weapons outside US border.
End all taxpayer funded construction outside US including “solar” and “green” projects. If “treaties” or “agreements” such that above–whether for 5 years, 10 years, or forever–aren’t cancelled immediately, this affirms that US taxpayers are indeed enslaved and have grounds for declaring emancipation.
If US elites wish to continue foreign activity with their “allies,” they’re free to do so without a penny of US taxpayer money.
The above may be reconsidered if two conditions are met: One, if US stops all immigration to the US for 10 years, and two, builds a solid cement wall 300 feet high and 6 feet deep across the entire US southern border.
……………………………….
No comments:
Post a Comment