July 2012 "unemployment also increased in Florida, Virginia, North Carolina, Iowa, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Colorado, Wisconsin and New Hampshire."...
8/17/12, "Unemployment rates rose in 44 U.S. states in July," AP
"Unemployment rates rose in 44 U.S. states in July, the most states to show a monthly increase in more than three years and a reflection of weak hiring nationwide.
The Labor Department said Friday that unemployment rates fell in only two states and were unchanged in four.
Unemployment rates rose in nine states that are considered battlegrounds in the presidential election....
The national unemployment rate ticked up to 8.3 percent from 8.2 percent....
Still, 31 states gained jobs in July, while 19 lost them....People who are out of work are counted as unemployed only if they’re looking for a job.
In the most closely contested states in the presidential race, unemployment has fallen over the past year. That could help Obama in his contest with GOP candidate Mitt Romney.
But it has started to tick up in recent months. In Nevada, the rate rose to 12 percent in July from 11.6 percent the previous month. That’s the highest rate in the nation, though it’s still much lower than a year ago, when it was 13.8 percent.
And in Michigan, the rate has increased to 9 percent, from 8.5 percent two months earlier.
Unemployment also increased in Florida, Virginia, North Carolina, Iowa, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Colorado, Wisconsin and New Hampshire.
Most competitive states have unemployment rates below the national level, so even recent increases may not have a large impact on voter sentiment.
Iowa’s unemployment rate, for example, increased to 5.3 percent, still the sixth-lowest in the country. New Hampshire’s rose to 5.4 percent and Virginia’s increased to 5.9 percent, both far below the national rate.
Only four swing states have higher unemployment rates than the national figure:
- Nevada, Michigan, North Carolina at 9.6 percent, and Florida at 8.8 percent....
Many political scientists say voter attitudes may be shaped more by national economic trends than local or statewide changes."...
- [Ed. note: AP desperate to help Obama, says, "Many political scientists say..." rubes won't look at how badly Obama has treated their state, will just look at an admittedly flawed national jobs number. Why can't AP admit that Obama has simply done what he said he would do which is to transform America?]
(continuing, AP): "Most Americans probably read or hear more news about the national economy than they do about their local areas, some experts say. And they may not attribute regional economic changes to presidential policies.
Overall, the economy hasn’t been growing fast enough to generate more hiring. It expanded at an annual rate of only 1.5 percent in the April-June quarter, down from 2 percent in the first quarter and 4.1 percent in the final three months of last year." via Drudge
-----------------------------------------------------
12/11/2007, "Obama: We'll 'transform America'," Seattle PI, A. Galloway
""We will stand up in this election to bring about the change that won't just win an election, but will transform America," he said wrapping up the speech of nearly 30 minutes."...
---------------------------
Ed. note: Please excuse bright white background behind this post. This was done by hackers.
No comments:
Post a Comment