Tuesday, March 27, 2012

CRS says billions in US tax dollars funneled to third world for alleged 'global warming' likely wasted due to graft, but Obama seeks $770M more

.
CRS says congress may want to consider that global warming isn't happening anyway.

3/26/12, "Obama Requests $770 Million to Fight Global Warming Overseas," CNS News, Matt Cover

"The Obama administration has requested $770 million in federal funds to combat the effects of global warming in developing countries, a new congressional report details, continuing its policy of using foreign aid to combat the effects of global warming in the developing world.

The figure, from a recent report from the Congressional Research Service (CRS), shows that despite another year of $1 trillion deficits, the Obama administration continues to pursue its policy of using foreign aid funds for anti-global warming measures – known as the Global Climate Change Initiative (GCCI).

According to CRS, the government has spent a total of $2.5 billion on GCCI since 2010 on overseas anti-global warming efforts in Latin America, Asia, and Africa.

For 2013, the Obama administration has requested an additional $770 million for its policy, a figure that if approved by Congress would bring total foreign climate change spending to $3.3 billion.

The administration uses the money to fund three types of anti-global warming foreign aid: adaptation, clean energy, and sustainable landscapes.

Adaptation, according to CRS, seeks to help developing countries insulate themselves from the effects of climate change by giving farmers and government planners access to better climate data. It also aims to aid countries by teaching them new agricultural and land use methods, as well as methods to protect against the rising sea levels, floods, and increased droughts said to be the result of global warming.

Clean energy funding seeks to aid poor countries in developing their own clean energy infrastructures in order to offset the fact that developing countries are the single fastest growing source of greenhouse gas emissions. The federal spending supports the creation of so-called green jobs in the developing world as well as the creation of clean energy projects.

Sustainable landscape projects seek to stop developing countries from cutting down forests, particularly in tropical areas, for farming or logging – or at least teach them to develop more modern logging and farming techniques, laws, and regulations.

CRS pointed out that Congress should consider several issues as it weighs the administration’s fiscal year 2013 GCCI budget request – including whether the funding was fiscally responsible.

“Budget constraints may lead to questions about sustaining high levels of support for international development assistance in general, and international climate change assistance in particular,” CRS noted.

“The burden is exacerbated during times of economic downturn, when the federal government is hard-pressed to generate fiscal resources to adequately address domestic challenges and maintain basic levels of public services and quality of life,” CRS added.

They also noted that – like most foreign aid programs – there was a high probability that foreign countries would misuse or waste GCCI funds.

National and international institutions that dispense financial assistance have sometimes been criticized for inefficient and bloated bureaucracies, their lack of transparency about project procurement practices and operating costs, and the proportion of their funds misused or lost through instances of graft, corruption, and other political inefficiencies,CRS said.

Finally, CRS noted that foreign economic aid programs like GCCI have a mixed record of results and that Congress may want to consider the fact that there is a lack of consensus on whether global warming will happen at all.

Current uncertainties and ambiguities regarding the fields of atmospheric chemistry and climatology have been offered by some as reasons to postpone and/or reconsider international climate change assistance policies and programs,” CRS added.

However, CRS also noted that the typical benefits of foreign aid applied to GCCI programs as well, including preserving the United States’ leadership role in the world, the national security benefits of keeping countries stable, and the benefits to U.S. corporations of trade with developing countries." via Weasel Zippers

========================

Ed. note: The article says the "Congressional Research Service (CRS) notes it's highly likely our money will be wasted due to the corrupt nature of the people we're giving it to, and that 'global warming may not be happening' anyway. Global warming is the most perfect crime of all time, a license to steal from Americans in perpetuity. One can see why those in the 'climate' industry fight so bitterly against those of us they've enslaved when we seek to break the chains.

Of course all this has been done with the help of the US political class. If we're already giving billions to third world countries to save them from global warming, why are climate conventions continuing around the world for the purpose of blaming the US for global warming and demanding billions in reparations? The above article doesn't even go into the billions we already give endless UN groups for fraudulent 'programs,' all 'no strings' US tax money that will never be tracked.

As far as giving money 'to preserve US leadership,' I thought alleged US leadership was why we are hated, and that we were going to tone it down so we wouldn't be so hated.

--------------------------------

3/22/12, "Mammoth new green climate fund wants United Nations-style diplomatic immunity, even though it’s not part of the UN," George Russell, Fox News

"The Green Climate Fund, which is supposed to help mobilize as much as $100 billion a year to lower global greenhouse gases, is seeking a broad blanket of U.N.-style immunity that would shield its operations from any kind of legal process, including civil and criminal prosecution, in the countries where it operates."...

------------------------------

11/14/10, "Climate policy distributes the world's new wealth," NZZ, am Sonntag, German press, interview with former co-chair of the UN IPCC Ottmar Edenhofer" a German economist.

------------------

"Jewel-encrusted" faucets

2/18/12, "Africa's despots of decadence facing French crackdown," Guardian News and Media, Sydney Morning Herald

"At 42 Avenue Foch, one of Paris's most expensive streets, looms a five-storey mansion complete with disco, spa room, hair salon, gold- and jewel-encrusted taps and a balcony-view of the Arc de Triomphe.

Local people always knew when there was about to be a visit from its 41-year-old ''playboy'' resident, Teodorin Obiang, the eldest son of the autocratic President of Equatorial Guinea. Days before his private jet touched down, two trucks would pull up and disgorge a sea of flowers to dress the interior of the mansion.

Crates of the most expensive burgundy were another regular delivery. On one occasion 15,000 DVDs were hauled in."...

------------------------------

"UNDP withdrew $6.7 million from a U.S. line of credit without permission in 2007...UNDP has yet to explain what happened to that money, the report says."...

UN employee crimes cannot be prosecuted because the UN is above the law. If more Americans knew this it is logical they would demand our withdrawal from the UN.

"Federal prosecutors in New York City were forced to drop criminal and civil cases because the U.N. officials have immunity,"...

4/16/09,
"Report: U.N. spent U.S. funds on shoddy projects," USA Today, Ken Dilanian

"
Two United Nations agencies spent millions in U.S. money on substandard Afghanistan construction projects, including a central bank without electricity and a bridge at risk of "life threatening" collapse, according to an investigation by U.S. federal agents.

The U.N. ran a "quick impact" infrastructure program from 2003 to 2006 under a $25 million grant from the U.S. Agency for International Development. The U.N. delivered shoddy work, diverted money to other countries and then stonewalled U.S. efforts to figure out what happened, according to a report by USAID's inspector general obtained by USA TODAY under the Freedom of Information Act.

"Due to the refusal of the United Nations to cooperate with this investigation, questions remain unanswered," the report says."...

.

No comments: