Sunday, August 28, 2011

Taxpayers inform themselves and vote against squandering $1.5 million scarce tax dollars, aren't even accused of being Tea Partiers!

.

.
These citizens luckily aren't described in the WSJ article as Tea Partiers. Recently active persons known as Tea Partiers are likely 'racists' and transplants from "Dixie," per polls extolled by NJ Star-Ledger.

8/27/11, "Taxpayers Strike Back," WSJ, Douglas Belkin, Wheatland Twp., Illinois
  • "Residents Overturn Township's Plan for New $1.5 Million Office"
"In these tough economic times, the sight of angry taxpayers filling the auditorium of a suburban high school isn't unusual.

But those gathered in this Chicago suburb earlier this month weren't facing off against impassive town officials. In a rare expression of direct democracy that invoked a 100-year-old state law, all 200 people present got to vote, and resoundingly
  • overturned the township's plan to build a new $1.5 million civic office.

"We directed an out-of-control government to listen to the people," said Debra Holscher, the campaign's leader, who kicked off the insurrection by scribbling out a petition and getting 17 people to sign it at the town's annual meeting in April.

Keri-Lyn Krafthefer, attorney for the township of 45,000, says she is studying whether the vote is legally binding.

"It's a tricky mess to unravel," she said. "On both sides there are these sophisticated requirements that need to be followed and may not have been."

Townships have long been the odd ducks of state government. They date to an order by the Continental Congress that divided the nation into six-by-six mile tracts. Today, in many states, townships have disappeared. In others, they maintain roads and provide other services in unincorporated areas.

In Illinois, whose fiscal problems rival those of California, townships are among the 6,000 units of government with taxing authority, the most in the nation, said James Nowlan, a senior fellow at the Institute of Government and Public Affairs of the University of Illinois. Virginia, by contrast, has 343....

The plan to build new government offices for the township some 40 miles west of Chicago was born in 2004. Residents gathered for the annual meeting, as dictated by Illinois law, in which all citizens have a right to show up and vote.

Just 20 people attended that year, and 18 voted to endorse the plan to replace the homely, metal-skinned building in an industrial area next to a car shop that

  • houses the township's nine full-time employees.

"We need something new because what we have now is not a building that best represents the people that we represent," said Wheatland Township Supervisor Todd Morse, who has championed the new building.

Back in 2004, subdivisions were rapidly sprouting up in the township's cornfields and its finances looked strong. Today, homes in surrounding Will County have lost 29% of their value on average since August 2006 and one in 10 homeowners is 90 days or more behind on their mortgage, according to CoreLogic, a real-estate data firm.

Nationally, voters are denying referendums to float bonds for public projects twice as often as they did during the boom years, according to the Bond Buyer, a trade journal.

"There's a lot of people out here who are unemployed and have no money for food," said Chuck Miller, a field representative for a roofing company.

The plan to forge ahead with a new building of up to 7,300 square feet didn't sit well with Ms. Holscher, who learned about it at a township meeting last summer. A 54-year-old retired professor of occupational therapy, Ms. Holscher is a veteran local political activist who rails against government waste. She called the planned building the Taj Mahal and started rounding up allies by

  • sending an email blast to more than 700 like-minded fiscal conservatives.

At this year's annual meeting in April, she brought about 100 people with her. But she was turned down for procedural reasons when she tried to introduce a motion to conduct a study of the need for the building....

An ally in the crowd asked what the opposition could do to force a reassessment. Ms. Krafthefer, the township attorney, said they could petition for a new meeting.

Ms. Holscher hastily scratched out this sentence on a legal pad: "Petition for a special meeting to discuss overturning the new building." She passed the pad around and collected 17 signatures, two more than required. By submitting it, she leveraged a 100-year-old law granting citizens unusual power in township governance.

At the meeting earlier this month, which had been posted at the local YMCA and library, Ms. Holscher and a committee she organized laid out options A through E, for

  • an alternative town hall with price tags ranging from $300,000 to $700,000.

Amid a sea of Holscher backers, one person tried to stop them: Mr. Morse's wife, Barbara (Morse the Wheatland Township Supervisor who championed the building).

  • "There is no statute here that you can point to that this is a legal meeting," she said, waving three laminated posters bearing the town bylaws.

Ms. Holscher's attorney, Doug Ibendahl, responded: "Actually this is a model of transparency." The crowd applauded.

Andy Parker, a vice president at a software company, said there should be a sixth option: "Do nothing."

So Ms. Holscher walked to an easel set in the front of the auditorium and with a black marker wrote, "Option F, do nothing."

When it was time to vote, everyone in the auditorium headed to the area of the room where a sign for the plan they favored was posted. One hundred and twenty seven people crowded around "Option F."

"This is even better than what I expected," Ms. Holscher said after the vote."

-----------------------

--------------------------

New polls by Campbell and Putnam "two academic political scientists" along with a CBS/NY Times poll allegedly prove Tea Party supporters to be the opposite of what they are, including of course that they are RACISTS.

"Just who are the people of the tea party, the big “new thing” in American politics — or at least in the Republican Party?

Lots of claims are made for them. They’re newcomers to electoral politics, some say. Conservatives to be sure, but independents, too, spread pretty evenly throughout the country, largely devoid of racial animus, and broadly representative of a large portion of the whole population.

That’s the stereotype. But a vastly different description emerges in a pair of studies, one by two academic political scientists and a second by a CBS/New York Times poll,

  • both based on extensive interviews with tea partiers.

Early on, tea partiers were often described as nonpartisan political neophytes,” write political scientists David E. Campbell and Robert D. Putnam. “Actually, tea party supporters today were highly partisan Republicans long before the tea party was born. In fact, past Republican affiliation is the single strongest predictor of tea party support today.”

The tea party cohort is overwhelmingly white, male and older — on that, the stereotype is on the mark — but it “had a low regard for immigrants and blacks long before Barack Obama was president,” Campbell and Putnam report.

Or, as the CBS/Times poll found when tea partiers were asked what specifically they didn’t like about Obama, “the top answer was that they just don’t like him.”

From the standpoint of future politics and the 2012 presidential race, the most significant finding from the studies may involve the geographical distribution of the tea party loyalists.
If the CBS/Times study has it right, the tea party participation is principally a Southern phenomenon. More than a third “hail from the South, far more than any other region,” it found, and that has important implications for the GOP next year and perhaps beyond.

It’s no secret the modern Republican Party has moved dramatically to the right. Less clear, however, is how much the GOP already is a Dixie-dominated party....

It may be a sign of what’s ahead for the GOP that the ultra-right Texas Gov. Rick Perry, another Southerner preferred by tea partiers, has just displaced Mitt Romney as the favored candidate of Republicans. Perry went overnight from virtually unknown to a double-digit poll lead over the mostly moderate Romney.

The Texas governor benefits from another preoccupation of the tea party crowd — its preference, like his, for a politics rooted in religion. Tea party leaders may parade under the banner of smaller government, but the rank and file, Campbell and Putnam stress, “are more concerned about putting God in government,” something

  • most Americans say they oppose.

While it’s clear the tea party has a chokehold on the GOP at the moment, that’s no guarantee it will hold true through the 2012 election....

-----------------------

8/28, "Opening Day: Tea Party Express V," Lloyd Marcus, American Thinker

Lloyd is as Tea Party as you can get, but it doesn't sound like pollsters have found him. Poll cited above says tricky Tea Partiers aren't the novices they claim to be, they've secretly been long time operatives. Lloyd mentions a typical Tea Party lady. She was new to the political world and found it so interesting she wrote a book about it:

"One such patriot I met today at our Napa rally is author, Robin Bohr. Robin's husband Mike got tired of her yelling at the TV. He suggested Robin write a book. Robin penned, "Tea Party: American Revolution 2.0". It is the compelling history of average Americans entering the political arena for the first time."...

==========================

I'm a Tea Party supporter and am nothing like the findings in the polls described by the Star-Ledger. I live in Manhattan (not 'Dixie'), am female, would be a registered Independent but the law here would prevent me from voting in primaries so I'm a registered Republican. At one time I was a registered democrat. When I switched to Republican I always referred to myself as "a liberal, pro-Choice Republican" never a conservative. Religion is not important but respecting that we are founded on Judeo-Christian values is. Evangelical Christianity had nothing to do with the formation of the Tea Party. Rick Perry has been on the national scene for only a few weeks but his presence is now seized upon as "proof" the Tea Party is mostly Evangelical Christians from "Dixie." I voted for Bill Clinton the first time. My views haven't changed in over 20 years. What has changed is the people who control the mechanisms of the Republican Party. Some of whom advance the insane "neo-con" philosophy. They are in business for themselves, don't care about the country, and are contemptuous of voters. Since I am not like them I have to call myself something different. Today I say I'm a 'conservative.' The only thing that has changed is today the internet exists. ed.



via Behind the Black by Robert Zimmerman, photo Sun-Times media, Star-Ledger article via Hot Air

More to Gibson Guitar Obama shake down than East Indian Rosewood which competitors freely use

"It appears that payback by the Obama administration against its political opponents is the main reason the Justice Department raided the Gibson guitar company. Its CEO donates to Republicans, while Gibson’s main competitor – never raided – donates to Democrats."

Comments to Behind the Black

  1. I think the case that this was political is a bit thin, but not out of the realm of possibilities. I think its much more likely this is nut case in Justice department that thought they were going to make a name for themselves taking down a well know company, than a form of intimidation. That is not to say it wasn’t only that evidence is mostly circumstantial.

    In this case government incompetence is a lot easier to believe in this case not knowing any of details from the Justice departments side of things than a political attack.

    Reply
  2. David Hollick

    Gibson was taken down for using East Indian Rosewood in the manufacture of their guitars. That’s interesting because the other 2 players in the high quality acoustic guitar market are C. F. Martin and Taylor. Both of these manufacturers proudly advertise using East Indian Rosewood. Both contribute heavily to Democrats, and neither are being harrassed."


.

Hurricane, politicians and the media-perfect storm of hype, Telegraph

.
8/28/11, "Perfect Storm of Hype: Politicians, the media and the Hurricane Irene apocalypse that never was," UK Telegraph, T. Harnden

"Stumbling and apparently buffeted by ferocious gusts, he took shelter next to a building. “This is our protection from the wind,” he explained. “It’s been truly remarkable to watch the power of the ocean here.”

The surf may have told a story but so too did the sight behind the reporter of people chatting and ambling along the sea front and just goofing around. There was a man in a t-shirt, a woman waving her arms and then walking backwards. Then someone on a bicycle glided past.

Across the screen, the “Breaking News: Irene Batters Long Island” caption was replaced by stern advice from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): “Stay inside, stay safe.”

The images summed up Hurricane Irene – the media and the United States federal government trying to live up to their own doom-laden warnings and predictions while a sizeable number of ordinary Americans just carried on as normal and even made gentle fun of all the fuss.

There was almost palpable disappointment among the TV big guns rolled out for the occasion when Irene was downgraded to a mere ‘tropical storm”....

The truth is that the dire warning beforehand suited both politicians and journalists. Just as with the minor earthquake that shook the east coast last week causing no loss of life and virtually no damage, Irene became a huge story
----------------------------

8/26/11, Global warming guys use fact that Bloomberg evacuated sections of NYC PRIOR to the storm as proof of global warming




via Drudge

Rick Moran says right of center Americans who oppose the GOP Establishment are "anti-science Luddite" "galoots" with "dirty fingernails"

.
Commenter says of Rick Moran, "Somebody who is willfully blind to what is going on in this country is part of the problem."

8/27/11, "The Travails of the GOP Establishment," Pajamas Media, Rick Moran

Rick Moran is a good example of a Republican Party that destroyed itself, the country, lifetimes of work and sacrifice, and was happy to remain in the minority. He writes frequently for American Thinker which is astounding considering the article he wrote on Pajamas Media. Many who visit AT would find themselves among those Moran disdains as having "dirty finger nails" and being "anti-science." He terms such people "the right wing" or "the Tea Party."

Moran describes his group's superiority over non-Establishment right of center Americans:
  • "civilized,
  • witty,
  • urbane,
  • educated,
  • well-read,
  • bow-tie-wearing
  • public intellectual
  • and Washington insider."
So Moran considers us uncivilized, boring, uneducated, uninformed, and not intellectual. Has Moran ever heard of Andrew Breitbart? He also mistakenly considers us "a minority" within those who would vote on the GOP line. Possibly wishful thinking.

Moran says we, his opponents, have "righteous certainty in their views and pedal-to-the-metal hate for their political opponents that grips a large segment of the right."

"Pedal to the metal hate?" Moran has it exactly backwards. He projects his own hate. With all the serious problems facing our country, Moran focuses elsewhere:


"The establishment doesn’t refer to Obama as a “Communist” (although they may refer to his “socialist policies”), nor do they make reference to Obama as a “dictator.”
What mostly defines an establishment member these days is the level of disdain exhibited toward Tea Partiers, the evangelical right, and the anti-science Luddites and anti-intellectual galoots who make up a sizable minority of the GOP base and who threaten to determine who will face Barack Obama in 2012.

The prospect of denim-wearing, dirty-fingernail, rank-and-file activists actually having an impact on the nominating process for the GOP presidential candidate has the establishment wringing their hands and scrambling to find another candidate more in line with their idea of governance. Take their money? Sure. Direct their energies into volunteer efforts for candidates? Absolutely.

But let them decide who should represent them as a candidate for president? Perish the thought."...

-----------------------

3 Comments to Moran's article on Pajamas Media

"7. cfbleachers

"If ever there was an Exhibit A as to how to throw away the opportunity to salvage the wreckage that is this land of ours from the insane policies of unchecked leftism, it is this execrable piece of mindless drivel.

Let me be open here, I find some portions of the “argument” here to have validity. In fact, I personally lean toward a “thinking man’s candidate” such as Ryan or Daniels.

Peppered in this road apple essay, however, are the snide hallmarks of a weak, limp and lame assault on those who don’t buy the fraud of global warming, or the front of “centrism of the hardcore leftists in the current administration.

One need only to ignore the pictures posted by Zombie of the march of the union comrades, the work of Stanley Kurtz unveiling the Midwest Academy, New Party, Cooper Union, etc. brigade…and a series of hires unveiled by Christian Adams on these very pages.

Because, heaven forbid…someone might see far left ideology…and call it that, which would offend the delicate sensibilities of those who “know better” and are the “intellectual betters” who must suffer the indignity of hanging out with the “dirty fingernail” crowd of “the little people of the extreme right”.

I find myself in an awkward space here. It infuriates me to read some imbecile going off on “RINO’s” whenever yet another social issues trap is set and leg snare snaps shut…sending the country into a spasm of ridiculous chatter about a near irrelevancy while the country inches toward economic collapse.

On the other hand, some self-annointed braying ass, wheezes out how “stupid” non-leftists are for not buying into the global warming hoax or for pointing at the radical extremism rampant in the Soros, Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Frank Marshall Davis, lineage of EVERY policy put forward by this administration.

Pointing at extremism….provokes the assault of “extremist” by the feeble-minded and myopic curators of “reasonableness”. Oh, brother.

Let me be clear. If you think this administration is not extreme after reading Kurtz, Horowitz, Christian Adams and Zombie…if you believe that global warming wasn’t an agenda rather than pure science…you have no credibility on national issues.

I may prefer Ryan or Daniels…but, I would take a bowl of split pea soup and vote for it over the radical extremists on the left that have seized power and nearly brought this country to the brink of collapse. And I would be honored to buy those “dirty fingernails” a beer any time…rather than sit with a prissy, self-absorbed, myopic who can’t see the danger in rampant, unchecked leftism that endangers this land of ours each and every day from now until November next year."

---------------------------

"proreason

Spot on.

The Ruling Class and ankle biters like Moran recognize no boundaries when defending their own.

Somebody who is willfully blind to what is going on in this country is part of the problem. They can man the guillotines instead of being in them."

--------------------------

"44. K.T.

“It’s that these apostates don’t possess the uncompromising fervor of righteous certainty in their views and pedal-to-the-metal hate for their political opponents that grips a large segment of the right.”

Interesting article Rick – until I got to this paragraph at least. Your understanding of who and what we are seems to slip between the neurons of your left-leaning brain. Once again for your benefit Rick, its the LEFT that carries hate and discontent for their political opponents. You offer up that line with NO PROOF at all of hatred on the part of the right. What it does prove is where your loyalties lay – establishment republicanism.

And FWIW there is little difference between G. Will K. Rove (or R. Moran) and the power brokers on the left. Each want power above all else – and will say and do anything to the opposition (us, I.E. Tea Party) to keep themselves in power.

Their attitude is to control how they lose so they don’t lose control.

Rove is the perfect example – having savaged Christine McDonald on national tv (Hannity) in a way that even most leftists never would to one of their own kind. Rove makes money from dispensing power and advice – take that away and Rove becomes irrelevant. Rove will do and say anything to keep his relevancy. ANYTHING. G. Will is no different.

And so it seems – Mr. Moran – you will too. I ask you to to take back that nasty line I quoted from your article.""

.

Cap and trade seen as financial rescue for Goldman Sachs, NY Stock Exchange, trillions likely-Rep. Gillibrand

.
Written in 2009 by Democrat Gillibrand: "Transaction fees alone could top nearly half a billion dollars." None of which goes to 'climate,' but to Wall St. Gillebrand says we must use "international offsets such as reforestation projects in South America." These are well known brutal crime operations. She uses the term 'carbon' rather than 'carbon dioxide.' The idea of a "carbon dioxide commodity trading exchange" was set in motion having nothing to do with saving the planet.

10/21/2009, "Cap and Trade Could Be a Boon to New York," Wall St. Journal Op-Ed by NY Democrat Kirsten Gillibrand

"The city is uniquely positioned to benefit from a global market in carbon emissions."

"Over the past year, the economic crisis has devastated the financial services industry that fueled New York's boom years. The ripple effect from Wall Street is still being felt, as unemployment has risen to
  • 10.3% in New York City.

In this turmoil, it may seem hard to imagine a financial market poised to deliver significant growth. However, a rising number of investors and financiers see one in the trading and reduction of carbon. According to financial experts, carbon permits could quickly become the world's largest commodities market, growing to as much as $3 trillion by 2020 from just over $100 billion today. With thousands of firms and energy producers buying and selling permits to emit carbon, transaction fees for exchanges and clearing alone could top

  • nearly half a billion dollars.

If Congress establishes proper oversight of a carbon market, New York's financial talent, expertise and institutions are uniquely suited to provide the tools and innovation for a new commodities market of this size. Firms wishing to invest over the long term will need to turn to our financial sector to create the emerging products and provide the capital that would allow them to make green energy investments.

An infrastructure is already beginning to form, as entities like the New York Stock Exchange, J.P. Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and the new Green Exchange are developing carbon trading platforms or expanding their environmental trading desks. There are nearly

  • 100 funds already focused on green investments.

As a member of the Senate Environment, Agriculture, and Foreign Relations Committees—all of which will have a lead role in the development of climate change legislation—I am focused on several core principles to ensure effective oversight of this new market and help New York seize this opportunity.

First, to succeed we cannot repeat the mistakes of the past. The patchwork of regulations that allowed exemptions for certain classes of derivatives and no oversight of others threatened the stability of the entire financial system.

Carbon is a commodity derivative, and the new carbon market must conform to the broader commodity derivatives oversight that President Barack Obama and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner have outlined. Congress should integrate carbon trading into comprehensive financial reform. * (See CCC founder)

Uniform regulation will allow the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to apply and enforce the capital reserves, position limits, and transparency in a way that ensures a safe and well functioning marketplace. New York will be positioned to gain market share in this growing marketplace due to its superior and substantial financial talent and expertise.

Second, the wide range of possible carbon reductions—from agricultural offsets, to efficiency technology, to wind powerwill require innovative specialized contracts that can meet firms' needs. For example, in order to finance a new clean power facility, a company will need to lock in a fixed cost of carbon over a long period of time. Standardized derivatives would not provide a company

  • the flexibility to hedge these costs over the long term.

We must allow the market to provide the ability to customize products. These customized contracts are essential for firms to adapt to the new regulations, hedge risk, and raise capital. New York's financial industry is already the global leader for existing customized commodity products and would be exceptionally well positioned to provide the legal and financial expertise necessary for these new products.

Some have suggested that we mandate exchange trading of carbon-related derivatives, effectively requiring standardization of all derivatives. In order to trade on an exchange, a derivative contract must be highly standardized. As a result, such a requirement would effectively ban customized derivatives.

Closing off these markets to customized contracts would block carbon emitters from the products they need to hedge costs and fund long-term carbon reduction projects. The carbon market in the European Union uses customized contracts 75% of the time, demonstrating the need for flexibility in such a system.

Lastly, it is essential to the long-term success of climate-change legislation and the ultimate benefit for New York that the market for carbon-emissions permits is internationally integrated. We should encourage the use of international offsets, such as reforestation projects in South America,"[*see photo of dead South Americans below] which will drive investments in the most efficient reductions and allow firms in the U.S. to capitalize on their innovative practices across the globe.

New York and the U.S. have a lot to gain from our efforts to combat climate change, and a lot to lose if we fail."

"Ms. Gillibrand, a Democrat, is a U.S. senator from New York."

------------------

Photo, "Inconvenient Farmers" in carbon credit murders.

Honduran farmers alleged killed by private climate militias, EurActiv

10/3/11, "Carbon credits tarnished by human rights 'disgrace'," EurActiv, Arthur Neslen

--------------------

10/3/11, "Honduran Deaths Trigger EU Carbon Credit Clash," New American, R. Terrell

"
The Honduran farmers plight is frighteningly similar to the situation in Uganda, where government authorities evicted more than 20,000 people and destroyed their homes so another UN-accredited corporation, New Forests Company, could plant trees on their property. Planting those trees would allow New Forests to earn extra ERCs from the UN, which it can turn around and sell on the international market. Such greed is also the motive behind the violence in Honduras, prompting some EP members to call for rescinding Honduran carbon credits. The European Union is more tight-lipped about Uganda, possibly because New Forests Company

  • is backed by the World Bank and the EU."...



via commenter at AT


Vice President of US goes half way around world to Communist China and tells them America's problem is ....The Tea Party

.
8/22/11, "Even in China, Joe Biden couldn't resist using the Tea Party as a political punching-bag," UK Telegraph, Nile Gardiner

"Not content with comparing the Tea Party to “terrorists” a couple of weeks ago on Capitol Hill, the vice president has travelled all the way to China to blame the grassroots conservative movement for the humiliating Standard and Poor’s credit downgrade. In response to a question from a medical student at Sichuan University, who asked about “what measures you’re going to implement to reduce those deficits and redeem the financial strength of America”, Biden declared that it was the intransigence of the Tea Party, or “a group within the Republican Party” as he put it,
  • that was to blame for the current deficit-driven financial crisis."...

------------------------

Pretty funny considering the Tea Party has no power whatsoever. Far left Democrats control the White House, the Senate, and all federal agencies cranking out new regulations/laws every day. The House is controlled by Establishment Beltway Good Old boy Country Club Golfing Republicans who have no intention of doing anything the Tea Party wants and keep trotting over to their pals the democrats for extra votes if they feel like passing something or not. The Tea Party is the American middle class. The Beltway thought it could be kicked around forever and would not complain. ed.




via Free Republic

Yikes! Right of Center conservatives feel safe coming out of the closet in California. Tea Party Express in Napa, Young Repubs. in SF

.
"'It's getting more comfortable to say 'I'm a conservative' in conversation,"" said a 27 year old Californian. "Obama has been great for us," said another.


8/27/11, "Conservatives upbeat at 2 Bay Area gatherings," SF Chronicle, by Joe Garofoli and Carla Marinucci

"
They've been dismissed as the inconsequential, angry, funny-hat-wearing political fringe. But conservatives and Tea Party activists at lively celebrations in the Bay Area say they're beginning to be recognized as something else as the 2012 elections loom: a mainstream movement.

With two big gatherings - a California Young Republican Federation convention in San Francisco on Friday and a Tea Party Express gathering in Napa on Saturday - it wasn't so lonely being a conservative in the Democratic bastion of the Bay Area....

Looking out on a field of hundreds of picnicking Tea Party activists at the Napa Valley Expo - many of them holding signs blasting bloated government, high taxes and skyrocketing debt - Russo said the armies of just regular people represent "the zeitgeist of the times."

The Napa site bloomed with signs, bumper stickers and buttons that reflected discontent with the country's direction: "My shovel is ready: where is my job?," "RU seeing RED yet?" and "Stop socialism."

Once dismissed as "AstroTurf" - a term of derision meant to cast doubt on the grassroots claims of its adherents - the Tea Partiers have proved to be an enduring movement that reshaped Congress in the 2010 elections and already has been a force for both candidates and themes in the 2012 GOP presidential field, Russo said.

The Tea Party Express, for example, will for the first time sponsor a major presidential debate, a Sept. 12 event in Florida to be broadcast on CNN.

"It's not about social issues. It's just about how we don't want to spend more than we actually have," said Joyce Ellis, 57, of Walnut Creek, a former production manager and a member of the East Bay Tea Party Express. She said when she joined the movement,

  • "I thought I'd be the only one. ... I saw I wasn't."

In San Francisco, where more than three times as many voters (30 percent) decline to state a party preference as register as Republicans (9 percent), a statewide convention of 300 California Young Republican Federation members gathered to hear a trio of conservative stars, UC Berkeley law Professor John Yoo, author Ann Coulter and blogger Andrew Breitbart....

"This is a unique moment for people to say, 'The hell with it.' The country is going to hell in a handbasket, and the progressive, silver-haired, ponytailed politics doesn't work," Breitbart said in an interview.

In both crowds, the mood was ebullient among conservatives.

"The movement is maturing," Amy Kremer, a former flight attendant who is chair of the Tea Party Express, said as she prepared to address the Napa crowd. Hundreds sat in lawn chairs, listening to country singers, rappers and comedians, all with a conservative bent.

While Democrats have long railed against the Tea Party movement, she said, "we are the biggest threat to the Republican Party, because we want them to be conservative - and we will shine a light on them."...

One Young Republican, 27-year-old Alameda resident Andrea Newman, said she feels "optimistic in a way that I didn't four years ago. It's getting more comfortable to say 'I'm a conservative' in conversation."

"Obama has been great for us - a lot of young Republicans are finding each other," said Matthew Del Carlo, a 34-year-old native San Franciscan who directed the California Young Republican Federation convention in his native city....

----------------------------

8/27/11, "Lloyd Marcus Reporting from Tea Party Express V," Lloyd Marcus, American Thinker



via Lucianne.com, photo SF Chronicle

Polar bear figure returns to work but is still under investigation and will have no role in future contracts

.

"Monnett was told he would have no role in developing or managing contracts, and would work in the agency's environmental assessment division."...AP

8/26/11, "Polar bear researcher is back at work, but still under investigation," Nature Newsblog

"Polar bear researcher Charles Monnett is back at work at the US Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE) after a six week suspension over unspecified “integrity issues” (read Nature's take on the debacle here).

BOEMRE says the wildlife biologist remains under investigation. Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), which is providing legal representation to Monnett, says the agency is also running a separate investigation into its complaint that Monnett’s superiors breached the research integrity policy of the US Department of Interior (DOI), which includes BOEMRE, when they suspended him.

Monnett was a co-author on a 2006 paper in Polar Biology reporting observations of polar bears that had apparently drowned in a storm while swimming long distances in search of sea ice. Drowned polar bears became an iconic symbol of the possible adverse effects of climate change. But in 2011 the Inspector-General of the DOI, which includes BOEM, interviewed Monnett about the paper, and about his award of an $800,000 contract to researchers at the University of Alberta in Canada to support research on a polar bear population that spans the US-Canadian border.

While IG investigators refused, in an interview transcript released by PEER , to elaborate on the nature of the misconduct allegations, a notice sent to Monnett in August and provided to Nature by PEER makes the contract management concerns clearer. It says the IG believes Monnett may have broken procurement regulations by helping Deroucher draft a proposal for a contract that Monnett was later involved in awarding. PEER

  • says Monnett’s involvement was sanctioned by Monnett’s supervisors.

A spokeswoman for BOEMRE, Melissa Schwartz, says Monnett’s reinstatement has nothing to do with PEER’s allegations against his superiors and was motivated by federal regulations that create a presumption against lengthy administrative leaves, which should be “reserved for exceptional situations when all other options are considered insufficient to adequately protect the government's interests.”"

----------------------------

8/26/11, "Federal Agency Lifts Alaska Scientist's Suspension," AP


via Tom Nelson, via Reference Frame