Wednesday, December 4, 2019

US regime change group NED, National Endowment for Democracy, spent $445,000 to sow discord in Hong Kong in 2018, $4.7 million to sow discord in Mainland China in 2018-ned.org

.
………………………….
“Expanding Worker Rights and Democracy
Solidarity Center (SC)
$155,000
To expand worker rights and democracy and promote the development of civil society in Hong Kong. The center will support partners to strengthen the capacity of trade unions, including migrant and domestic worker unions, to organize, bargain and advocate for better protections for workers, and to raise public awareness and promote participation in worker rights issues.
Promoting Engagement of Fundamental Rights
National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI) [Democrat Party branch of NED]
$200,000
To facilitate engagement on Hong Kong’s growing threats to guaranteed rights. The institute will organize a seminar series in Hong Kong on how national security can be protected while safeguarding fundamental rights and will facilitate international advocacy for Hong Kong scholars, legal practitioners, and civil society leaders to raise awareness of recent developments among influential international stakeholders.
Strengthening Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Protection
Hong Kong Justice Center
$90,000
To strengthen democratic institutions and human rights protections. The program will work with civil society networks and political leaders to improve compliance with international standards for human rights, and will seek to increase the international community’s awareness of human rights abuses in Hong Kong through advocacy and as part of the Universal Periodic Review process.”
…………………………………
Collaborative Responses to Democratic Threats,” 
Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE)
$388,105
To identify new approaches to respond to the threats that China is posing to the democracy promotion community domestically and abroad, and to strengthen the resiliency of civil society organizations in China. The organization will help increase the capacity and access to information of CSOs and nurture the next generation of CSO leaders.
Advancing Citizen Participation for Accountable Environmental Governance
Accountability and Governance
$60,000
To strengthen environmental civil society organizations’ (CSOs) capacity to empower citizens to hold local government accountable through public monitoring and civic participation. The program will include working with local and international partners to hold a foundational workshop with CSOs; arranging and facilitating meetings among CSOs, citizens, government officials, academics, and private sector representatives; and reporting on outcomes and new opportunities for civic engagement.
Advancing Women’s Rights
Human Rights
$50,000
To advocate for and raise international awareness of women’s rights in China. Project activities will include organizing lectures, conducting a training workshop, undertaking international advocacy, and launching campaigns to increase international awareness on women’s rights issues in China through various available platforms and established networks. Utilizing its strong country-based network and resources, the international audience will be kept up-to-date on women’s activism in China.
Building Advocacy Capacity and Empowering Civil Society to Protect Human Rights
Human Rights
$540,000
To build the capacity of civil society actors to advocate for, promote, and defend human rights. This project will facilitate cooperation and coordination among human rights defenders, and will foster greater understanding of universal human rights standards and the mechanisms available to defend those standards in the international community. Through this project, rights defenders will implement a broad program of advocacy and capacity-building activities, while also connecting Chinese activists to international human rights actors.
Combating Censorship, Countering Propaganda, and Supporting Free Expression
China Digital Times, Inc.
$250,000
To provide access to uncensored news and commentary about China’s influence on the information space and to monitor and document the use of surveillance and censorship technologies both domestically and internationally. The organization will work to increase access to information in Chinese cyberspace and will provide, in English and Chinese, political and social commentary and perspectives on China’s growing global influence as it impacts democratic institutions. The organization will also nurture a community of influential internet users to respond to censorship and disinformation in China and globally.
Defending and Assisting Rights Defenders
Rule of Law
$60,000
To support, aid, and defend human rights defenders and their families. The project will provide legal aid and direct assistance to human rights defenders and their families, advocate on their behalf through its extensive network of lawyers, activists, and other civil society organizations, and support small projects seeking to improve access to justice at a local level.
Democratic China Electronic Journal
Democratic China, Inc.
$100,000
To provide a platform for debate and intellectual discourse on democratic movements and strategies for democratization in China. The organization will publish articles by academics, activists, students, and artists about current social and political issues with a focus on freedom, human rights, and constitutionalism, and will use various forms of social media to distribute articles.
Empowering Citizen Journalists to Defend Human Rights
Human Rights
$62,000
To foster debate on public policy issues through journalism, analysis, and art, and to increase the capacity of citizens to report on human rights issues. Project activities will include documenting human rights violations, advocating for human rights, and working with citizen journalists to increase their reporting, analysis, and writing skills.
Embedding Civil Society in a Shifting Environment
International Republican Institute (IRI) [Republican branch of NED]
$600,000
To strengthen civil society capacity. The institute will conduct targeted workshops and expand its Electronic Commons program to provide grassroots civil society organizations (CSOs) with sustained access to information, skills, and approaches to manage programs and build organizational capacity in an increasingly restrictive operating environment. The institute will also support the ongoing development of civil society advocacy by supporting four CSO networks, promoting youth civic engagement, and implementing good governance workshops at the local level.
Empowering Environmental Rights Activists
Accountability and Governance
$250,000
To support a network of environmental groups to monitor, document, and conduct advocacy and public outreach on the health of local waterways. The program will help local partners coordinate initiatives to promote citizen engagement in efforts to protect the environment and act as a watchdog to ensure compliance by local governments and businesses.
Empowering Rights Lawyers and Activists to Protect Civil Society Space
NGO Strengthening
$250,000
To develop and implement methods to push back against the closing space for civil society in China. The organization will work with lawyers and civil society activists to maintain operations under the new laws by expanding the pool of lawyers available for consultation, equipping these lawyers to effectively advise rights civil society organizations, and building CSOs’ capacity to assess and mitigate operational risks. The organization will also develop and strengthen international networks and collaboration among lawyers and CSOs working to protect civil society in closed countries.
Empowering Workers
Freedom of Association
$95,000
To monitor and analyze labor activism, and to support workers organizing to protect their constitutional and labor rights. Using advanced technological analysis tools, the project will monitor labor strikes and incidents in China, and will build the capacity of labor activists and lawyers to use the legal system to protect freedom of association.
Engaging Critical Analysis and Political Discourse
Freedom of Information
$165,000
To provide a platform for high-level analysis of international relations, governance reform, China’s domestic politics, and the potential for democratic transition for intellectuals, scholars, and policy advisors inside and outside of China. The organization will publish a quarterly journal featuring carefully researched and thought-provoking articles to distribute to decision-makers critical to reform.
Ensuring Free and Open Access to Online Information
Freedom of Information
$240,000
To ensure access to censored media, news, and information websites through a free and safe Internet browser application. This project will maintain a censorship-circumvention web browser application that gives Chinese citizens free access to objective information and fosters use of websites that focus on democracy, human rights, and civil society.
Humanitarian Assistance for Human Rights Defenders
Human Rights
$30,000
To provide humanitarian assistance to human rights activists, rights defenders, and political thinkers who face repression and financial hardship due to their work. Through coordination and collaboration with multiple networks, the project will distribute short-term, emergency aid to human rights activists and their families facing harassment and arrest.
Monitoring Media Censorship
Freedom House
$84,000
To promote awareness among Chinese and international stakeholders about the state’s control of information and media, and to provide information about ongoing and potential responses to that control. The organization will produce a monthly publication that reports on censorship in both Chinese and English online versions to challenge censorship and counter the government’s propaganda efforts.
Promoting Democratic Ideas and Values [Hong Kong mentioned]
Democratic Ideas and Values
$125,000
To educate and train civil society activists on democratization and social movements and to provide a platform for youth to engage in discussion of democratic ideas and civil society activism. The project activities include holding seminars, workshops and trainings to facilitate the exchange of ideas and cooperation among activists in Hong Kong, mainland China and Taiwan, and maintaining a multi-platform program for Chinese youth to learn about modern history and current events, comparative democratic development, and civil society initiatives.
Promoting Democratic Values
Wei Jingsheng Foundation, Inc.
$40,000
To promote awareness of democratic values among the Chinese public, and to inform the international community about human rights violations within China. The project will continue its outreach through its website, information distribution networks, and frequent interviews with the international and Chinese press, and seek to engage new supporters through participation in community activism.
Promoting Digital Activism
NGO Strengthening
$45,000
To improve civil society activists’ digital expertise to protect human rights, ensure accountable government, and encourage civic participation. Activists and civil society organizations will be trained in civic technology concepts, digital tools and security, and will be provided resources for protecting freedom of digital information. This project will promote collaboration among civil society activists and the technology community to push for digital transparency, open governance, and accountability.
Promoting Government Transparency and Accountability
Accountability and Governance
$45,000
To empower civil society organizations and individual citizens to push for government transparency and accountability. The organization will equip individuals and organizations to use open government information regulations by conducting trainings on submitting and tracking government information disclosure requests, publishing an information disclosure manual, and providing direct assistance for pursuing OGI cases.
Providing Information and Analysis on China’s Human Rights
China Change
$80,000
To raise the profile of human rights defenders and liberal intellectuals, and to provide analysis on political developments in China. The organization will translate commentaries and interviews from leading intellectuals and rights defenders from Chinese into English, provide brief summaries of daily events and timely reports on human rights abuses, and write original profiles and opinion pieces about China’s human rights and democracy movements.
Religious Freedom, Rights Defense, and Rule of Law
Rule of Law
$45,000
To assist victims of religious persecution in defending their human rights and freedom of religion. Legal aid will be provided to individuals whose rights have been violated because of their religious beliefs. Project activities will also include training lawyers and interested citizens about their rights under Chinese law and organizing an international exchange for Chinese lawyers and activists to engage with other lawyers and policymakers about the right to religious freedom.
Strengthening Organizational and Advocacy Capacity for Community-Based Organizations
NGO Strengthening
$100,000
To strengthen the organizational and advocacy capacity of community-based organizations working with vulnerable and marginalized populations. Project activities include providing technical support and consultation on local CBOs’ fundraising strategy, training on organizational management and advocacy skills. The project will also include a leadership training program for community leaders and advocacy on health rights issues at regional and international levels.
Strengthening the Rule of Law to Protect Human Rights and Public Participation
Rule of Law
$230,000
To equip lawyers to engage effectively in combatting torture, to advocate for equal access to education, and to improve public participation in local government. Legal training on combatting torture and other police abuses will be supported. The organization will work to address discriminatory educational policies through raising awareness with government officials, legal assistance, and engaging the public. The project will advance meaningful opportunities for public participation by piloting participatory budgeting models that engage both local government and civil society.
Strengthening Worker Rights and Representation
Freedom of Association
$150,000
To increase workers’ awareness and legal knowledge to protect their rights, and to advocate for labor rights. Project activities will include the production of investigative reports on rights violations, workshops for workers on labor laws, and the distribution of easily understood written materials on fundamental labor rights. Additionally, the project will work to expand women’s leadership roles in the labor rights movement.
Supporting Freedom of Expression through Technology
Freedom of Information
$76,200
To promote freedom of expression for censored publishers and writers. The project will provide access to platforms and online distribution mechanisms that allow writers and publishers to publish independent news and views, reaching a wider audience for literature on important contemporary social and political issues.
Supporting Grassroots NGOs
NGO Strengthening
$90,000
To build the capacity of NGOs and engage young activists in policy advocacy. Groups focused on human rights education, access to justice, and policy advocacy will receive assistance with administrative work and strategic direction. The project will also provide assistance to human rights defenders at risk and their families.
Supporting, Safeguarding, and Empowering Human Rights Lawyers
Rule of Law
$155,800
To strengthen the rule of law by improving the skills of human rights lawyers, facilitating access to justice, and documenting rights violations against the legal community. Project activities will include providing legal aid, holding professional exchange and strategic litigation workshops, documenting and disseminating information about rights violations against lawyers, managing a small fund in support of research and advocacy projects, and offering emergency humanitarian assistance.
Worker Rights Awareness
Solidarity Center (SC)
$345,000
To strengthen the capacity of workers and advocates to advance worker rights in China, the center will continue to support efforts of workers and grassroots worker rights advocates to conduct worker outreach and education, provide legal assistance, train worker activists and legal practitioners, and advocate for policy changes, with the objective to raise workers’ awareness about their rights, promote better enforcement of labor and safety laws, and protect the rights of the most vulnerable workers.”
.............

Trump converted US taxpayers to servants of Islamic terrorists by instantly accepting a false claim by Jaish al-Islam in Douma in April 2018. OPCW inspectors didn’t even set foot in Douma until a week after Trump dropped bombs on Syria for no reason

.
Before OPCW scientists had even set foot in Douma to begin research on the alleged chlorine event, Trump on 4/14/18 launched a massive US taxpayer funded bombing on Syria. Chemical weapons inspectors didn’t arrive in Douma until around 4/21/18, two weeks after the alleged 4/7/18 chlorine event. By then, without a shred of evidence except the word of Islamic terrorist group Jaish al-Islam, Trump had already bombed Syria for no reason.

Just hours after Jaish al-Islam’s 4/7/18 complaint, Trump in front of the whole world treated the completely unproven Douma event as a major war crime requiring an expensive US taxpayer funded response. Trump calls out ‘Animal Assad’ for [alleged] attack, criticizes Putin, 4/8/28, AP via Military Times, Jonathan Lemire…“Although the U.S. government was still working to verify the claim by Syrian opposition activists and rescuers that poison gas was used, Trump declared that there would be a “big price to pay” for the [alleged] use of the outlawed weapons of mass destruction.”…On April 11, 2018, still with no evidence whatsoever, he boasted about US missiles and made gross statements about leaders of Syria and its neighbor and ally Russia: “Get ready Russia, because they will be coming, nice and new and ‘smart!’ You shouldn’t be partners with a Gas Killing Animal who kills his people and enjoys it!”It's Trump who loves killing. It's Trump who instantly leaps to defend an evidence free complaint by terrorists--because dropping US taxpayer funded bombs-for any reason or no reason-is the only outwardly "presidential" thing his bosses let this coward do. A week later on April 14, 2018a full week before OPCW scientists had even set foot in DoumaTrump launched a massive US taxpayer funded bombing campaign on Syrian government sites. 

On Saturday evening [April 7, 2018], Jaish al-Islam accused the Syrian government of carrying out a chemical attack on Douma….The [Syrian] government has denied carrying out any such attack.”4/8/2018, “Jaish al-Islam to leave Douma in return for releasing prisoners,” uk.reuters.com: The [terrorist] rebel group [Jaish al-Islam] has more than 3,500 prisoners and hostages in its prisons in Douma, Rami Abdulrahman, the director of the U.K.-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group, told Reuters.”
……………………………………. 

Added: Trump’s pal Jaish al-Islam was known for capturing civilians in Syria and putting them in cages. “Abdel Rahman [of Syrian Observatory for Human Rights] said most of the civilians were kidnapped by Jaish al-Islam two years ago outside Adra al-Ummaliyah, a [Syrian government] regime-held neighbourhood in Eastern Ghouta.”…AFP
 

Image: The video published by opposition news outlet Shaam Network showed cages of men and women in the street….Dozens of men and women believed to be Alawites being held in metal cages as ‘human shields’ in Damascus suburb.” AFP]…“Jaish al-Islam, regarded as the most powerful rebel group near the capital, has put [Syrian government] regime soldiers and Alawite civilians it was holding in metal cages, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights told AFP.The group then placed these cages in public squares in the Eastern Ghouta region in an attempt to “prevent [Syrian government] regime bombardment”, Observatory head Rami Abdel Rahman said.”
..........

Army of Islam (AOI), Jaysh al-Islam, Jaish al-Islam, globalsecurity.org 

“In September 2015 Jaish al-Islam, pledged allegiance to the Islamic State group. “We, the soldiers of Jaish al-Islam…consider ourselves to be an integral part of Wilayat Sinai [ISIS in the Sinai peninsula],” the online statement said….
.....
Jaish al-Islam includes salafi and former Muslim Brotherhood members with Saudi connections….Its primary base of operations had been Damascus, particularly the Douma and East Ghouta regions…. 

Jaysh al-Islam’s repeated shelling of Damascus and its suburbs with mortar rounds, its military cooperation with the al-Nusra Front, and its brutality toward opponents (including public executions of prisoners, and the parading of civilian women around in metal cages) has led to the group being compared with the Daesh (ISIL/ISIS) terrorist group…. 
 
[Image, AFP, 11/2/2015] 

Jaish al-Islam (JAI) is thought to be funded by Saudi Arabia. Jaish al-Islam was one of the major groups involved in operations in Idlib, making up part of the Battle of Victory operations room that took the city of Jisr al-Shughur in later April 2015….The US government assessed that AOI [Army of Islam] received the bulk of its funding from a variety of criminal activities in Gaza…. 

“After some time,” [Israeli Arab affairs analyst] Hugi noted, the Saudis made contact with [AOI commander] Alloush and began financing the activities of his militia, as they had other organizations fighting against Assad. With time and generous Saudi support, his group grew, and changed its name to Jaysh al-Islam….[Alloush] has little faith in democracy, seeking to establish an Islamic state ruled by a committee of Islamic scholars…. 

This militant group, the analyst explained, “truly is a real army, with at least 10,000 fighters in its ranks and, according to some sources, up to 15,000. They have armored vehicles, air defense and artillery. Unlike Daesh, which gathered Muslims from all over the world, all of Alloush’s soldiers are Syrians…. 

On 25 December 2015, the Syrian Army confirmed that Zahran Alloush, the leader of the Jaysh al-Islam, a group operating in the suburbs of Damascus had been killed in an airstrike…. 

Amazingly, although perhaps not surprisingly, much of the Western media rushed to eulogize Alloush and his ‘moderate’ Islamist rebels, the Wall Street Journal suggesting that his death “imperiled planned peace talks,France24 running the headline “In death, Syrian rebel chief haunts peace hopes,” and CNN lamenting that his death “casts doubt over Bashar al-Assad’s intentions.””
………………………………… 

Added: 

US Congress refuses to pass the Stop Arming Terrorists Act, insists on continuing to use US tax dollars to help Islamic terrorist headslicers.
……………………………….. 

Added: Trump and US genocide racket view terrorists as key partners in Syria helping them to get rid of Assad, as John Kerry explained in 2016:

US wanted ISIS to take Damascus:

 From Sept. 2016 meeting on sidelines at UN: “[John] Kerry shockingly admitted that US planners actually welcomed the ISIS push toward Damascus, which they felt they could leverage to put pressure on Assad to give up power to the US-backed [terrorist] opposition...Kerry explained that, We were watching. We saw that Daesh [ISIS]was growing in strength. And we thought Assad was threatened. We thought…that Assad might then negotiate. Instead of negotiating, he got Putin to support him.””
………………………………. 

Added: After 3 years, it’s clear Trump is an automated recording for the “interagency.” For example, we’re told terrorists in Syria’s Idlib province are a threat to Americans but US must not disturb them. Conversely, in northeastern Syria, no terror groups exist so therefore the area is no threat to Americans, but we’re told US taxpayer funded military is “guarding” the area anyway–instead of removing the admitted existing threat in Idlib:
 
“The Syria Study Group acknowledges that “al-Qaeda is in effective control of Idlib and retains the capacity to conduct external attacks”—yet warns against a Syrian attack on this enclave. The main achievement of Washington’s intervention has been to prolong one of the worst…wars in modern times.”…6/13/19, End America’s Illegal Occupation of Syria Now,“ Doug Bandow, The American Conservative…“Our presence there is a violation of domestic and international law.”…
……………………… 

Added: Trump parrots “interagency” northeast Syria policy in place since 2012 with the goal being an eventual US created Wahhabi enclave. He even parrots the excuse manufactured in 2012 to fool the rubes which is to claim US has to illegally annex northeast Syria (one third of the country) to protect the area from “ISIS” because you never know, it could come back anytime. 
 
US plan to create a Wahhabi enclave in northeast Syria was directly referenced in a Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) report from 2012. 

4/16/2018, How the US [Illegally] Occupied the 30% of Syria Containing Most of its Oil, Water and Gas,Whitney Webb, Mint Press News 

Despite Daesh’s [ISIS] defeat, their [ISIS] presence in Northeastern Syria, as the DIA reveals, was cultivated to provide a pretext for the foreign control of the region.…The U.S. plan to create a Wahhabi enclave in northeast Syria was directly referenced in a Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) report from 2012.”
…………………………

Comment: One third of Syria was stolen not by ISIS but by the terrorist US.
………………………………….. 

Added: George W. Bush thought it was funny that non-existent WMDs had been used to start a US taxpayer funded war in Iraq:
 
Image: George W. Bush jokes as he looks around his office for WMDs, still can’t find any: 3/26/2004, 

Bush’s Iraq WMDs joke backfires,” BBC: “At a black-tie dinner for journalists, Mr Bush narrated a slide show poking fun at himself and other members of his administration. One pictured Mr Bush looking under a piece of furniture in the Oval Office, at which the president remarked: “Those weapons of mass destruction have got to be here somewhere.After another one, showing him scouring the corner of a room, Mr Bush said: “No, no weapons over there,” he said. And as a third picture, this time showing him leaning over, appeared on the screen the president was heard to say: “Maybe under here?””





................

Monday, December 2, 2019

Putin is the only one not coddling terrorists in Idlib. France, Germany, and Turkey provide food and care for Al Qaeda in Idlib, now two German tanks will help Turkey in Idlib-Voltaire, 12/2/19…(Trump adores Islamic terrorists in Idlib, demands no one bother them. If Assad tries to rescue Syrians from Idlib, Trump threatens “massive attack” on Assad)

.
The Turkmen militia is based in Idlib where it is protecting the al-Qaeda affiliates currently ensconced there. French and German “NGOs” are on hand to provide food and care.”...It was US-made TOW anti-tank missiles provided by US to terror groups in Idlib that played a crucial role in helping Nusra terrorists conquer Idlib province in 2015. Trump apparently loves terrorists in Idlib since he’s a massive human shield for them, threatened a “massive attack” on Syria’s government if its elected president merely tried to rescue innocent Syrians from the US backed terrorist enclave. 

12/2/19, “Syrian Turkmen militia supplied with German-made tanks, Voltaire 

“The Syrian Turkmen militia, renowned for supporting the Turkish army against the PKK/YPG, has just received at least two Leopard 2A4 tanks (upgraded version featuring a digital computer). 

These tanks are manufactured by the German company Krauss-Maffei, which supplied the near totality of NATO forces throughout the 1980’s. The Turkish army bought 340 of them, around 50 of which were deployed in Syria and about a dozen were destroyed in battle. 

This is the first time that a militia in the Middle Eastern theater is endowed with modern armoured fighting vehicles. 

It is unclear whether Germany was notified in advance of this arms transfer. Labeled as “Syrian National Army” (SNA), the Turkmen militia is based in Idlib where it is protecting the al-Qaeda affiliates currently ensconced there. French and German “NGOs” are on hand to provide food and care. 

The Idlib governorate is separated from the rest of Syria by a ceasefire zone patrolled by Russian ground forces. Previous agreements, signed by Turkey, provided for the withdrawal of all heavy weapons from the Idlib governorate. Since the agreements were violated, the Syrian Arab Army deployed troops to drive the jihadists out of Al Qaeda, with the support of Russian aviation. 

It’s anybody’s guess as to what the Russian reaction might be if its troops were to cross paths with these tanks. In November 2015, the Turkish air force shot down a Russian Su-24, then Turkmen militia Grey Wolves leader Alparslan Celik wittingly finished off one of the Russian pilots, Oleg Peshkov. A major crisis ensued pitting the Russian Federation against Turkey and NATO.”
..........


Ukraine’s so-called land reform wasn’t for Ukraine, it was for US-led IMF whose principle is to ‘privatize profits and nationalize losses.’ Ukraine may be bankrupt by 2021 since so much of its budget goes to public debt-NewColdWar.org, Dmitriy Kovalevich

.
Privatization, as promoted by the IMF, can be summarized by the principleprivatization of profits, nationalization of losses. “Let’s be honest-we [Ukraine] are not a sovereign country. At least our government is under external control."..."Ukraine is a U.S.-controlled aboriginal regime.” Due to pyramid of public debt, deputy Aleksandr Dubinsky believes Ukraine will likely be bankrupt in 2020-2021. 

11/28/19, “November update: land privatization demanded by IMF, links to Biden graft scandal,” newcoldwar.org, Dmitriy Kovalevich 

“Written exclusively for the New Cold War website, this month our regular contributor on Ukraine, Dmitriy Kovalevich, delves into the unpopular but seemingly inevitable land reform in Ukraine – as demanded by the IMF and its association with the ongoing corruption scandal involving the Bidens.”… 

“November in Ukraine has been marked by the adoption of the so called ‘land reform’, in accordance of the demands made by the IMF amongst other international financial organizations. The reform opens the way for the mass privatization of Ukraine’s agricultural lands. The IMF has been making these demands for many years but assorted Ukrainian presidents have tried to postpone such an unpopular decision. Recent polls show that the overwhelming majority of Ukrainians of all political persuasions are opposed to land privatization, from far-right to far-left. 

After an intensive period of deindustrialization, which has taken place in recent years, agricultural land remain the only asset with any value in Ukraine but even so, it may be bought for very little. A remarkable fact is that one of the deputies from the ruling party ‘Servant of the people,’ Nikita Poturayev, while pressing his colleagues at the Parliament to vote for the bill on land reform, claimed [1] that this would be ‘settling scores with maniac V. Lenin’, i.e. the purpose of the bill was to abolish the land nationalization carried out following the October revolution

[4/25/2018, Ukraine is being deindustrialized according to Baltic scenario: opinion,” Eurasia Daily, Denis Gayevsky


  
[Image] A swap meet in Kiev. Photo: inosmi.ru
   
(continuing): “Ukraine’s fertile soil up for grabs. 

It has long been known that Ukraine’s soil is very fertile. Indeed, during WW2 the invading Nazis made a point of appropriating quantities of it; forcing POWs to collect the top soil and load it onto trains en route to Germany. Now these same lands could fall into the hands of international agro-holdings. [As of 2015 many foreigners already owned Ukraine land. For example, the United Farmers Holding Company, which is owned by a group of Saudi Arabian investors, controls some 33,000 ha of Ukrainian farmland through Continental Farmers Group PLC”] 

Ukrainian political expert Ruslan Bortnik says that the President of Ukraine Vladimir Zelensky and his team came to power under an obligation to sell out the agricultural land of Ukraine to foreign companies. Those who buy these lands, according to Bortnik, will only be thinking about making the quickest possible buck.Foreign companies are already operating on Ukrainian soil [renting land],” said Bortnik, “But they are competing with large Ukrainian agricultural holdings. They do not dominate. If the adopted land market model is launched, then only large foreign companies will remain in our market Let’s be honest-we are not a sovereign country. At least our government is under external control. And this is a part of the obligations of this government. This is the condition under which they came to power. They are paying the debts through privatization.” [2] 

Ukrainian farmers who still are landowners, formally at least – they just can’t sell it – are the same people who are unable to pay their gas and electricity bills, especially after the recent raising of energy prices – another IMF demand. Obviously, their financial desperation will mean that many will have to sell their land at a low price, certainly well below the market value. Meanwhile, Ukraine remains the poorest country on the continent of Europe and Ukrainian agricultural land remains the cheapest. Moreover, the lands may be bought up as repaying large loans collected by the Kiev government following the Euromaidan coup in 2014. 

This scheme of buying up Ukraine’s land is connected with the ongoing corruption scandal in the US: the one related to Joe Biden and the gas company ‘Burisma’. At the end of November, Ukrainian MPs (non-factional people’s deputy Andrey Derkach; a deputy from the Batkivshchyna Party Aleksey Kucherenko; and a deputy from the ruling Servant of the People party, Aleksandr Dubinsky) revealed it at the press-conference [3]. 

The point here is that the former Minister of Ecology of Ukraine Nikolay Zlochevsky, an owner of  “Burisma” gas company, in 2014 introduced a number of Western politicians to the board of directors of his company, which helped him to avoid accusations of corruption. Hunter Biden, son of former US Vice President Joe Biden, received monthly large payments for his “consultancy services”. As a result Ukraine’s General prosecutor General Viktor Shokin, who was investigating the corruption schemes of the company, was forced-under pressure-to resign by Joe Biden, who even boasted about it in the US media. 

Ukrainian MPs have now claimed at a press-conference that the money used to bribe the son of the former Vice President of the United States was in fact stolen. “Biden received money, the source of which is not the successful activity of Burisma, brilliant business moves, or recommendations. It is the money of the citizens of Ukraine. It was obtained by criminal means,” said the MP Andrey Derkach. The ultimate goal of all this fraud, in which the Bidens were deeply involved, will be the bankruptcy of Ukraine in 2020-2021, through the formation of a pyramid of public debt. 

Laundering scheme to withdraw money from Ukraine 

According to Ukrainian deputies, this was a part of a bigger laundering scheme to withdraw money from Ukraine via Latvian banks and the fund ‘Franklin Templeton Investments,’ which is close to the United States Democratic Party. The founder of the foundation, John Templeton Jr., was one of the main sponsors of the campaign of former US President Barack Obama. 

For the most part, it was in the region of $7.4 billion of stolen Ukraine’s public money, from which only a “small share” was used to bribe Western politicians, like Hunter Biden. The deputies have stressed that, according to the investigation of Ukraine’s general prosecution, the withdrawn and laundered money was then invested back into Ukraine. In particular through the Franklin Templeton Investments, the money was used to buy domestic government bonds (DGB), issued by Kiev at high interest rate. 

The principle of this scheme is that with the assistance of American funds, the laundered money was legalised and invested in government bonds at 6-8% in dollars and 15-17% in Ukrainian currency (hryvnia). This is leading to enormous growth in the Ukrainian public debt and eventually the bankruptcy of the country’s economy. 

Eventual bankruptcy of the economy 

Ukrainian prosecutor Konstantin Kulik recently stated[4] in an interview that Ukraine takes IMF loans to pay out on these debt obligations (DGB). As deputy Aleksandr Dubinsky stressed at the press conference, 40% of the current public budget goes towards the payment of the public debt of Ukraine, including the repayment of DGB at inflated interest rates.
According to him, bankruptcy on the debts could happen by the end of 2020 or 2021. 

And this scheme is connected with land privatization, as adopted by Kiev in November in accordance with the IMF demand. “DGBs are a financial instrument by which the state owes all its property when paying off the DGB. And if the land market is opened, the state will have no other valuable property, with the exception of land,” said Dubinsky, demanding the suspension of debt payments to international creditors. 

As a result of this unpopular land reform and the widespread violations of labour rights, Ukraine’s trade-unions called a general strike[5] for November 14 and began preparations. For the first time in the history of independent Ukraine, a strike committee was formed at the all-national level. This committee was joined by trade unions, individual entrepreneurs, small businesses, agricultural producers and farmers. 

Management fires workers, pays themselves millions in bonuses 

On November 14, Ukrainian railroad workers protested [6] in front of the Presidential office in Kiev against the announced plans to fire some 50% of railroad personnel. The workers demanded the railroad management should resign instead. The deputy head of the railroad trade-union, Alexander Mushenok, recently said [7] that currently “only 20 workers are employed where 60 workers are needed.” At the same time the workers claim that the top-level management of the company are paying themselves millions in bonuses. One of the IMF demands requires that the Kiev authorities privatize the railroad system as well. In practice, this means that the few profitable routes will be privatized by western companies, while the majority of non-profitable routes-to poorly developed provinces-will remain state-owned, making the railway transport even less profitable. 

The entire course of privatization, as promoted by the IMF, can be summarized by the principle ‘privatization of profits, nationalization of losses.” And the new Kiev government is far too dependent to protest against the imposition of this policy; however, this will effectively mean that this government will lose its credibility and trustworthiness among the people.” 

References: 

[1] https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/news/2019/11/13/7231816/
[2] https://www.politnavigator.net/ehkspert-obyasnil-kakie-inostrancy-kupyat-ukrainskuyu-zemlyu-i-chto-oni-s-nejj-sdelayut.html
[3] https://interfax.com.ua/news/press-conference/625821.html
[4] https://apostrophe.ua/article/politics/2019-11-20/myi-berem-dengi-mvf-dlya-togo-chtobyi-vyiplachivat-dengi-figurantam-obschaka-yanukovicha—prokuror-kulik/29279
[5] https://strana.ua/news/233632-v-ukraine-anonsirovali-zabastovku.html?fbclid=IwAR2wEBfMiIoSbW6dAHi1xE-d77f0CR1ByPXMnx07AksAcgBUjnUz9X_lV_E
[6] http://www.dsnews.ua/society/zheleznodorozhniki-ustroili-miting-pod-ofisom-zelenskogo-14112019112400
[7] https://ukraina.ru/exclusive/20191112/1025632228.html 

Previous updates on Ukraine 

October update: Ukraine continues former policy while split looms in new government
September update: Kiev is caught between two rocks and hard place
August update: same war against opposition media; ban on oldest Ukrainian unionist newspaper





........