"U.N. has hired companies well-known for their misconduct, violence and financial irregularities - and hired them repeatedly."
7/10/12, "Dangerous Partnership - Private Military and Security Companies and the UN," Global Policy Forum
"GPF's report on the use of Private Military and Security Companies by the United Nations is out! This investigative report reveals that the UN has dramatically increased its use of these companies in recent years, hiring them for a wide array of “security services” and giving them considerable influence over its security policies. It also reveals that the UN has no process to vet these companies and that UN leadership has been closing its eyes to company misconduct for more than twenty years. GPF calls on the UN to reform this out-of-control system and to critically examine whether these companies really make the UN safer, or whether they might achieve the opposite effect. You can read the executive summary and the full report."
7/10/12, "UN criticized for using private security companies," AP, E. Lederer
"A non-profit organization that monitors the United Nations published a report Tuesday criticizing the U.N.'s growing use of private military and security companies.
The Global Policy Forum said the U.N.'s increasing use of these companies is "dangerous," may increase rather than reduce threats and attacks on U.N. buildings and personnel, and suggests a system that is "unaccountable and out of control."
According to the report, incomplete U.N. data shows a steady rise in the number of security contracts from 2006-2007, with the value increasing from $44 million in 2009 to $76 million in 2010, the latest data available.
The majority of contracts in 2010 - $30 million worth - were for activities by the U.N. Development Program followed by $18.5 million for U.N. peacekeeping operations and $12.2 million for U.N. refugee activities, it said.
The report said the overall value of contracts is likely to be considerably higher because data from some U.N. bodies, like the U.N. children's agency UNICEF, is not included or incomplete.
U.N. spokesman Martin Nesirky said the United Nations believes it is appropriate to use armed private security contractors if the organization ensures "due diligence" in its operations.
"U.N. contracting policies have improved and we need to continue to improve them," he said. "The distinct differences in the ways that private security contractors go about their work also must be borne in mind."
Nesirky said the U.N. has been working on a system-wide policy for the use of armed private security companies and a draft policy was approved by security chiefs from all U.N. bodies at a meeting last month. It must still be approved by the U.N. system, he said....
According to the report, "in the absence of guidelines and clear responsibility for security outsourcing, the U.N. has hired companies well-known for their misconduct, violence and financial irregularities - and hired them repeatedly."
Lou Pingeot, the report's author, told a news conference that while these companies have been criticized for their roles in Bosnia, the U.S. government's rendition program, Afghanistan, Congo and Somalia she knew of no abuses in their work for the U.N.
She urged greater scrutiny of their work on the ground and called on the 193 U.N. member states to demand greater transparency on the number of contractors, their work and their effectiveness.
The report said the U.N. insists most companies are used for unarmed security services, but it said contractors are increasingly being used for risk assessment, security training and logistical support.
This effectively allows the companies to define the U.N.'s security strategy "and even its broader posture and reputation," the report said.
It also called for a U.N reassessment of its partnership with military and security companies to assess whose interests the contractors serve and whether they help the U.N. promote democracy, the rule of law and human rights." via Drudge