Sunday, March 25, 2012

Gallup-Independents and well educated reject man-caused global warming, recognize that climate variations have always occurred

.
Poll taken Mar. 8-11, 2012

3/21/12, "Republicans, Democrats Differ on Causes of Warmer Weather," Gallup Poll, Frank Newport

"
Republicans and independents are more likely to say the warmer temperatures are due to normal year-to-year temperature variations, while Democrats are more likely to say the cause is global warming....

Americans of all educational and age groups are more likely to believe the warmer temperatures were caused by normal temperature variations rather than by global warming."...(chart follows)

Post Graduate, All Adults

College Grad, All Adults

  • Natural 52
  • Man caused 25

Some College

  • Natural 41
  • Man caused 32

High School or less

The poll shows Independents agree more with Republicans on this topic, 51% of both Reps. and Inds. say weather is more likely due to "normal variations." Rep-Ind-Dem chart below, education chart follows:

Next, I’d like you to think about the weather in your local area this winter season compared to past winters. Have temperatures in your local area been -- colder than usual this winter, about the same, (or) warmer than usual this winter? If warmer, do you think temperatures are warmer mainly due to -- global warming (or to) normal year-to-year variation in temperatures?

Here is the education poll:

Americans apparently aren't buying the 'catastrophic' ad campaign and have 'read, heard, or seen' information that makes more sense to them. Gallup's Mr. Newport says those who don't agree with his view "clearly" do so for "political" reasons. He's above being political but you're not.

Making it about Rep. v Dem. doesn't account for data on Independent voters. The poll also shows highly educated people are more likely to attribute weather changes if any to "normal variations" that have happened throughout history rather than a reason to send billions of US tax dollars to the UN with the stipulation that none of the money will ever be accounted for and can be spent on anything including criminal acts (as is the case with all UN activities).

==================

3/22/12, "Mammoth new green climate fund wants United Nations-style diplomatic immunity, even though it’s not part of the UN," George Russell, Fox News

"The Green Climate Fund, which is supposed to help mobilize as much as $100 billion a year to lower global greenhouse gases, is seeking a broad blanket of U.N.-style immunity that would shield its operations from any kind of legal process, including civil and criminal prosecution, in the countries where it operates....

But before it is fully operational, the GCF’s creators—194 countries that belong to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and who are also U.N. members—want it to be immune from legal challenges and lawsuits, not to mention outside inspections, much like the United Nations itself cannot be affected by decisions rendered by a sovereign nation’s government or judicial system."...

------------------------------------

"UNDP withdrew $6.7 million from a U.S. line of credit without permission in 2007...UNDP has yet to explain what happened to that money, the report says."...

"Federal prosecutors in New York City were forced to drop criminal and civil cases because the U.N. officials have immunity,"...

4/16/09,
"Report: U.N. spent U.S. funds on shoddy projects," USA Today, Ken Dilanian

(Ed. note, US politicians are unconcerned that UN employee crimes cannot be prosecuted because the UN is above the law. US taxpayers might be more concerned if they knew about this.)


via Climate Depot

No comments: